RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


chiaThePet -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:01:43 AM)


Premature Ejaculation.

chia* (the pet)






Marc2b -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:08:30 AM)

Oh for cripes sake.

If President Obama has any balls he will tell them "thanks but no thanks," for two reasons:

A) The Nobel Peace Prize became meaningless when they awarded one to a terrorist (Yasser Arafat).

B) He (Obama) hasn't done anything to warrant it anyway.




rulemylife -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:16:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Morning,

Congrats Mr. President.

Did anybody else catch the fact that the cutoff for being nominated was just 2 weeks into President Obama's term? It's kind of cool that they are now awarding this thing for potential outcomes.

I do have an interesting question about the award. Are there any laws on the books now, that relate to an elected official receiving money from a foreign organization based on their actions and or possible future actions? Could such money be seen as a possible bribe for favors already rendered or for future favors? Just somefin to think about, no?

I wish you well,
Thadius



I would expect to see the prize money donated to a worthy cause, as has happened in the past.

But let's not let that ruin a new conspiracy theory about Obama.




DomKen -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:18:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Morning,

Congrats Mr. President.

Did anybody else catch the fact that the cutoff for being nominated was just 2 weeks into President Obama's term? It's kind of cool that they are now awarding this thing for potential outcomes.

I do have an interesting question about the award. Are there any laws on the books now, that relate to an elected official receiving money from a foreign organization based on their actions and or possible future actions? Could such money be seen as a possible bribe for favors already rendered or for future favors? Just somefin to think about, no?

I wish you well,
Thadius

You know I thought the award was a bad idea until I saw this.

Accusing the Nobel committee of bribery? Really?




Lucylastic -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:24:26 AM)

Maybe they were just so happy not to have to worry about shrub having his finger on the *FUCKYOUWORLD* button anymore.
Its a thank you for saving them at least four years worth of buying depends?

shrugs
just a thought




Sanity -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:29:30 AM)


With Barack, every tin horn dictator in the world gets a *FUCKYOUWORLD* button.

Great accomplishment, very peaceful. [/sarcasm]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Maybe they were just so happy not to have to worry about shrub having his finger on the *FUCKYOUWORLD* button anymore.
Its a thank you for saving them at least four years worth of buying depends?

shrugs
just a thought




UncleNasty -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:30:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Morning,

Congrats Mr. President.

Did anybody else catch the fact that the cutoff for being nominated was just 2 weeks into President Obama's term? It's kind of cool that they are now awarding this thing for potential outcomes.

I do have an interesting question about the award. Are there any laws on the books now, that relate to an elected official receiving money from a foreign organization based on their actions and or possible future actions? Could such money be seen as a possible bribe for favors already rendered or for future favors? Just somefin to think about, no?

I wish you well,
Thadius





I did.

I think.....

How can.....

Why should....

This just seems wrong, and something like a perversion, on so many levels.


Uncle Nasty




chiaThePet -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:36:12 AM)


WHAT!!!!

Susan Lucci edged out again?!

(not to mention Gandhi who has been snubbed five times)

chia* (the pet)




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:40:33 AM)

Such awards should be reserved until after someone has left office in my view (when an overall judgement of their time in office could be made). The Nobel prize committee should think long and hard about why such an award couldn't be handed out four or eight years from now. It just undermines the legitimacy of the award as Obama hasn't really done anything more than any other President has yet. Talking to Russia? Well every President has asked for a new relationship with Russia after taking office so what else?




Sanity -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:45:32 AM)


We all deserve a Nobel Peace Prize if its based on intentions, generally speaking we all have the very best intentions in mind whenever we set out to do anything. Said another way, there are many scenarios in which this could potentially blow up in the committee's face.




SpinnerofTales -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:48:10 AM)

~FR~

Admittedly the Nobel committee has acted strangely at times, and this is certainly more of a pat on the back for intentions than results (Although I think it a good thing that ovatures towards better diplomatic relations have been made and certain talks scheduled it certainly isn’t a resolution to problems but rather a step towards resolution). Still, it is a nobel prize and having it given to an American reflects well upon us, at least as much as being snubbed by the IOC reflects badly upon us. In short, it’s a nice pat on the ass for America and I don’t see any downside to it.

Frankly I’m shocked. I was sure that our bretheren on the right would be at least happy about an American receiving this commendation. I thought that they would say “While I may disagree with many of his policies I am glad, as an American, to see our president honored.” The fact that there is such negative response to this purely innocuous award absolutly is unexpected. Perhaps the open minded rationality of those to the right of our President’s position is lessening somewhat on this issue.





housesub4you -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 7:48:50 AM)

What I find interesting, is people are blaming O'bama, for winning the award.. Even to accuse (in a Fox news sort of way) him of bribing his way to victory.

Wow, I mean I agree that this prize has lost it's meaning, but I'm not going to find fault with someone simply because they won the thing.  Talk about blaming the winner.  Just cause the Nobel committee thinks "PEACE" is worth honoring, O'bama has/did for the last several years and in the election make it clear that he wanted to talk with other countries instead of bombing them.  One would think this is a fresh new idea for the USA.




chiaThePet -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 8:00:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales

Frankly I’m shocked.




You and Susan.

chia* (the pet)




Thadius -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 8:03:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Morning,

Congrats Mr. President.

Did anybody else catch the fact that the cutoff for being nominated was just 2 weeks into President Obama's term? It's kind of cool that they are now awarding this thing for potential outcomes.

I do have an interesting question about the award. Are there any laws on the books now, that relate to an elected official receiving money from a foreign organization based on their actions and or possible future actions? Could such money be seen as a possible bribe for favors already rendered or for future favors? Just somefin to think about, no?

I wish you well,
Thadius

You know I thought the award was a bad idea until I saw this.

Accusing the Nobel committee of bribery? Really?



I didn't accuse them of anything. I just suggested that there is a possible appearance of such activity... or at the very least something else going on behind the obvious. He was nominated less than 2 weeks into his term, and has won based on what???

Congrats to him on winning.




FullfigRIMAAM1 -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 8:09:15 AM)

Sanity, Obama's going to be responsible and judged accordingly in 4-8years, among the folks who can be honest beyond their agenda.
Here's a chart of the dollar.    I'm seeing massive dips before Obama became president...   Hell, I lived it, because I went to Europe mid 2007, and felt I was being bent over against my will, the dollar was so useless.   
"""http://www.advfn.com/p.php?pid=forexqkchart&curcode1=USD&curcode2=EUR.  

Anyway,  Kudos to the man who is trying to make the world a better place! [sm=banana.gif]   M




chiaThePet -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 8:09:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: housesub4you

make it clear that he wanted to talk with other countries instead of bombing them.



Might I interest you in a fabulous powder blue Burka in celebration of the Taliban's
latest peaceful shredding of humanity in Peshawar Pakistan? Half off!

Oh wait, that's limbs.

Never mind.

chia* (the pet)




Sanity -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 8:18:52 AM)


He's accepting it as a "call to action".





Sanity -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 8:29:22 AM)


Orrin Hatch just pointed out how the Nobel Committee only awards their prize to Liberal American politicians, which is true. Al Gore, Jimmy Carter... Bill Clinton is probably overdue.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullfigRIMAAM1

Sanity, Obama's going to be responsible and judged accordingly in 4-8years, among the folks who can be honest beyond their agenda.
Here's a chart of the dollar.    I'm seeing massive dips before Obama became president...   Hell, I lived it, because I went to Europe mid 2007, and felt I was being bent over against my will, the dollar was so useless.   
"""http://www.advfn.com/p.php?pid=forexqkchart&curcode1=USD&curcode2=EUR.  

Anyway,  Kudos to the man who is trying to make the world a better place! [sm=banana.gif]   M




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 8:34:34 AM)

Isn't that just because republicans have this tendency for warmongering which contradicts the idea of a peace prize?




FullfigRIMAAM1 -> RE: Obama wins Nobel Prize (10/9/2009 8:38:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Orrin Hatch just pointed out how the Nobel Committee only awards their prize to Liberal American politicians, which is true. Al Gore, Jimmy Carter... Bill Clinton is probably overdue.
Bill Clinton, though I loved the President, had his share of troubles;  some of which Obama has not exhibited.   Orin Hatch might be onto something, or maybe it's time Conservative American politicians took the hint, and began acting more like the the christians they purport to be.     M

And what SL4V3M4YB3 said
quote:

Isn't that just because republicans have this tendency for warmongering which contradicts the idea of a peace prize?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875