RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


GotSteel -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/19/2009 10:07:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Allow me to reiterate... yet again... Just because someone does something in the name of religion doesnt make it a religious act... nor the person implementing the cat a religious person. Honestly, how hard is that to comprehend?


I don't think religion means what you think it means. (Inigo Montoya voice)




tazzygirl -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 6:31:29 AM)

Then define it for me, GS. without snark, without criticism. Define the difference between religion, those with a belief in "god" or a higher power, and what has become the distortion.




vincentML -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 11:32:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

You are overlooking a bigger issue here. Those who wished to teach their children a christian view have gone to homeschooling or religious schools. No muss, no fuss. Especially the kind you are talking about. AND, before you start slamming me for pushing anything into your face... ahem... read up on whom your speaking too. I dont push anything. Nor do i run from it because someone tries to bully me.


Any slamming or bullying by me is your own perception and not my intent. Again you use such emotionally charged language.


quote:

The contention you held was that religion should be pushed aside and hidden in homes and churches. What happened to being allowed to practice what religion we wish?


Again, i refer you to previously quoted case law of the Supremes that held the right to practice what you wish is not absolute. My dispute is where and how publically you practice. True, this is an Atheist criticism and we have somewhat successfully eroded the stranglehold of Religious Orthodoxy. But it is not only an Atheist concern. It was first expressed in your own scriptures but a few decades after the crucifixion. I give you this quote from a religious source:


quote:

Ostentatious worship is worthless, for, rather than seeking to honor the Maker, it covets the attention of men. Jesus addressed this issue in the Sermon on the Mount. He warned:

Take heed that you do not your righteousness before men to be seen of them: else you have no reward with your father who is in heaven (Matthew 6:1).Of special interest here is the expression “to be seen.” It translates the Greek term theathenai, which is the basis of our modern word “theater.” The Lord is condemning performance worship! He illustrates his point by mentioning alms-giving (v. 2), prayer (v. 5), and fasting (v. 16).
If one’s worship is designed to attract the attention of an audience, when those human accolades have been collected the performer has been “paid in full,” for such is the significance of the expression “they have received their reward” (6:2).


You can find the quote here.

So it seems appropriate to ask what the humble Jewish preacher from the hills of the Galilee would make of all the public hoopla now paraded in his name. I wonder what Jesus would say of all the public display. I think it is an interesting speculation.


quote:

Nor can you prevent a group of students from praying if that is their wish. It just cannot be lead by faculty or be part of an organized sport. I have no problem with this. Many religious people have no problem with it. Those who do have ulterior motives... many political.


Ah yes, political. Now you have come to the heart of the matter. The real issue is the historical dominance of Orthodox Christianity over the politics of this nation. That is where the frontline of the battle lies. That is where the Christian Right continues to push its demands for their "truth." And that is where the secular resistance has been since the Puritans landed and established their own theocracy in the new world. I notice you chose not to comment upon my references to Roger Williams, et al.

Furthermore, I shall assume, hopefully correctly and without accepting your offer to "read up" on who i am talking to, that you were not an active participant in the school scene of the 1950s. You may not be aware of the atmosphere as you seem to so lightly dismiss the concerns of nonbelievers. Here is a quote i found that describes the times much better than I can:



Madalyn Murray's lawsuit which resulted in the removal of compulsory prayer from the public schools of the United States has had lasting and significant effects. Until the lawsuit, it was commonplace for students to participate in many types of religious activities while at school, including religious instruction itself. Nonreligious students were compelled to participate in such activities and were not usually given any ability to opt out. Up to that time, the notion of freedom of religion had been presumed to mean the freedom to choose a religion, not to choose freedom from religion, and not the freedom to choose no religion at all. With the success of the lawsuit, the intent of The Constitution with regard to the relationship between church and state again came under critical scrutiny and has remained there to this day. While students do pray in public schools to this day, even in organized groups (such as "See You at the Pole"), the lawsuit disallowed schools to include prayer as a compulsory activity required by every student. The success of O'Hair's lawsuit led to subsequent lawsuits by Mormon and Catholic families in Texas in 2000 to limit compulsory prayer at school-sponsored football games.

To be found here.

Now, i will concede up front that Mad Madalyn was a bizarre character who displayed disgusting disregard for others and is hardly an exemplar for contemporary atheism. I will further concede that she ended up murdered and buried in a Texas ranchland. And more delicious irony and comfort for you is the fact that her son for whom she brought suit ended up a Christian convert, just as Jane Roe of Roe v Wade is now an anti abortion advocate. I concede all of that so spare me the "gotcha" moment. I just wish to draw your attention to the atmosphere that weighed so heavily on nonbelievers in the Public Schools at the time.

I may have also been mistaken about the "Our Father" prayer. I thought when i wrote it i might be. But i am not mistaken about the 23rd Psalm. I recall it vividly. "The Lord is my shepard ... I will dwell in the house of the Lord forever."






quote:

If you do not wish to be lumped in with the zealots such as the murderer of Dr. Tillman then you have a responsibility to speak out against the excesses.

Ummm.. show me where i came out in support. You wont find one. If i decide not to post on a thread, its usually because i work alot of doubles. My time is sometimes limited to posting. By the time i get to some threads, what i want to say has already been said.

Unless you can show where i came out in support of murder, you owe me an appology.


Again twisting my words and meaning. Just as moderate Muslims have a responsibility to decry the acts of zealots who commit atrocities in their name, so do the moderate Christians have a similar responsibility.

quote:

Snarky by calling you a bigot when its obvious to many you are on the issue of religion?



Ah condemned as a bigot by vote. Was it a secret council as in the time of the Inquisition? ~~smiles~~

quote:

Now you are looking to even the score? Yes, that surely speaks volumes. And, in your comment, these same people you accuse of being kept ignorant and retarded in the knowledge of science and medicine are the same people you are so gleefully persecuting.


Yes, evening the score, leveling the political playing field. That seems a reasonable thing to ask. Hardly a "gleeful persecution" You are too dramatic.

Thank you for taking the time and effort to engage this conversation with me, tazzygirl.
Your remarks are much appreciated. Well, most of them anyway... lol!

vincent




Kirata -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 12:27:12 PM)

You screwed up your link to the Christian Courier.

Aside from that, I don't see what the Supremes have to do with anything. [:D]

[image]http://z.about.com/d/oldies/1/8/B/4/supremes.jpg[/image]

K.





vincentML -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 2:48:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

You screwed up your link to the Christian Courier.

Aside from that, I don't see what the Supremes have to do with anything. [:D]

[image]http://z.about.com/d/oldies/1/8/B/4/supremes.jpg[/image]

K.




Thank you. You're right I did screw it up. Maybe some interest would have accrued to the Court if it had been expanded to twelve with these three added.... at least a little more harmony. [:)]

Hopefully, tazzygirl will have the resources to find the quote in Matthew on her own, although i scarse think she needs my help.

vincent




tazzygirl -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 4:37:26 PM)

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

You are overlooking a bigger issue here. Those who wished to teach their children a christian view have gone to homeschooling or religious schools. No muss, no fuss. Especially the kind you are talking about. AND, before you start slamming me for pushing anything into your face... ahem... read up on whom your speaking too. I dont push anything. Nor do i run from it because someone tries to bully me.


Any slamming or bullying by me is your own perception and not my intent. Again you use such emotionally charged language.


As my grandmother would have said... the path to hell is paved with good intentions. Your intentions, and previous posts, have shown you hate religion with a deep passion. You left me with no alternative but to take you at your word.

Religious Orthodoxy.. im assuming you are referring to religious people. However, i dont view religion as unchanging. Many people dont. But your narrow view only sees what you wish to see. Again, referring to your bigotry.

quote:

So it seems appropriate to ask what the humble Jewish preacher from the hills of the Galilee would make of all the public hoopla now paraded in his name. I wonder what Jesus would say of all the public display. I think it is an interesting speculation.


As far as the quote from the bible, i couldnt agree more. No one should pratice their religion just for the sake of men. Question is, how do we know why they are doing what they are doing. Joan of Arc comes to mine.

quote:

Now, i will concede up front that Mad Madalyn was a bizarre character who displayed disgusting disregard for others and is hardly an exemplar for contemporary atheism. I will further concede that she ended up murdered and buried in a Texas ranchland. And more delicious irony and comfort for you is the fact that her son for whom she brought suit ended up a Christian convert, just as Jane Roe of Roe v Wade is now an anti abortion advocate. I concede all of that so spare me the "gotcha" moment. I just wish to draw your attention to the atmosphere that weighed so heavily on nonbelievers in the Public Schools at the time.


Now, here is more of your bigotry added in with lies, assumptions and stupidity. One, i find no comfort in the knowledge that ANYone has died. And what does it matter to me that he converted? Who do you think you are????

Gotcha moment??? WTF are you on about. Ya know, until this moment, i actually entertained the idea that you had a brain. Your comments above have lead me to see that you are without such an organ, blinded by your hatred for religion.

quote:

I may have also been mistaken about the "Our Father" prayer. I thought when i wrote it i might be. But i am not mistaken about the 23rd Psalm. I recall it vividly. "The Lord is my shepard ... I will dwell in the house of the Lord forever."


Again, The Our Father prayer was never taught in this century in public schools. So i think you are sadly mistaken, if not out and out right lying.

quote:

Again twisting my words and meaning. Just as moderate Muslims have a responsibility to decry the acts of zealots who commit atrocities in their name, so do the moderate Christians have a similar responsibility.


You cannot decry and belittle something and then turn around and demand i take up responsibility in what you have belitted and scorned. Its called... being hypocritical.

quote:

Madalyn Murray's lawsuit which resulted in the removal of compulsory prayer from the public schools of the United States has had lasting and significant effects. Until the lawsuit, it was commonplace for students to participate in many types of religious activities while at school, including religious instruction itself. Nonreligious students were compelled to participate in such activities and were not usually given any ability to opt out. Up to that time, the notion of freedom of religion had been presumed to mean the freedom to choose a religion, not to choose freedom from religion, and not the freedom to choose no religion at all. With the success of the lawsuit, the intent of The Constitution with regard to the relationship between church and state again came under critical scrutiny and has remained there to this day. While students do pray in public schools to this day, even in organized groups (such as "See You at the Pole"), the lawsuit disallowed schools to include prayer as a compulsory activity required by every student. The success of O'Hair's lawsuit led to subsequent lawsuits by Mormon and Catholic families in Texas in 2000 to limit compulsory prayer at school-sponsored football games.


Here is the problem with your knowledge about this case.

quote:

Until the lawsuit, it was commonplace for students to participate in many types of religious activities while at school, including religious instruction itself




Like four other states, Pennsylvania law included a statute compelling school districts to perform Bible readings in the mornings before class. Twenty-five states had laws allowing "optional" Bible reading, with the remainder having no laws supporting or rejecting Bible reading. In eleven of those states with laws supportive of Bible reading or state-sponsored prayer, courts[clarification needed] had declared them unconstitutional (Boston, 1993, p. 101).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abington_School_District_v._Schempp

The Schempp case was combined with the O'hara case in the final decision.

The school district appealed to the Supreme Court again, and, on appeal, the case was consolidated with a similar Maryland case launched by Madalyn Murray (Boston, 1993, p. 106).

The district court ruling in the second trial, in striking down the practices and the statute requiring them, made specific findings of fact that the children's attendance at Abington Senior High School was compulsory and that the practice of reading 10 verses from the Bible was also compelled by law. It also found that:

(same source)

And the fact that these schools recited the Lords Prayer when most other schools didnt should tell ya something. Lumping everyone into one big group just makes your argument all that much more... ahem... ok.. ill be nice now. But i did notice your absence of taking note of the pausing in the school days for Muslim prayer. I wonder why that is... possibly because your hatred doesnt extend beyond christianity.

But, guess what... lol... it made no difference to me... or most people. A few religious fanatics made a ruckus. The rest just continued on with their lives.



quote:

Yes, evening the score, leveling the political playing field. That seems a reasonable thing to ask. Hardly a "gleeful persecution" You are too dramatic.

Thank you for taking the time and effort to engage this conversation with me, tazzygirl.
Your remarks are much appreciated. Well, most of them anyway... lol!

vincent


Until i read your comment about taking comfort from someone dying, i would have continued to engage you respectfully. Now, all bets are off. You have shown yourself to be unable to step back from your passions to see anything other than your own point of view. narrow minded is what bests describes you.




tazzygirl -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 5:45:12 PM)

quote:

It is name calling when you ignore any knowledge of the restrictions imposed upon freedom by Puritan Religious Orthodoxy. I suggest you go review the cases of Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson who were brought to trial and driven from the Massachusetts Bay Colony because of their religious heresy and outspokeness. Contrary to the propaganda nonsense you have been fed, religious freedom is not a founding cornerstone of this Nation or of the Colonies that preceded it. The Puritans were very rigorous in enforcing their orthodoxy. The Salem Witch Trials are but another ugly example. Religious freedom has been established in this country by taking away the monopoly of religious orthodoxy. You cannot deal with that or are uneducated in the history, and so you resort to calling me a bigot.


I dont have to ignore them. They are part of history. Yet again, because you insisted i send my attention to the names within this paragraph, it seems you have overlooked yet again a couple of things.

The history of Puritans isnt a pretty one. They wanted nothing to do with Catholic religions, with even most Christian religions.

A Puritan of 16th and 17th-century England was an associate of any number of religious groups advocating for more "purity" of worship and doctrine, as well as personal and group piety. Puritans felt that the English Reformation had not gone far enough, and that the Church of England was tolerant of practices which they associated with the Catholic Church. The word "Puritan" was originally an alternate term for "Cathar" and was a pejorative term used to characterize them as extremists similar to the Cathari of France. The term "Puritans" roughly corresponds with Luther's term Schwärmer. Because the Puritans were under the influence of radicals critical of Zwingli in Zurich and Calvin in Geneva, they seldom cooperated with Presbyterians in England. Instead, many advocated for separation from all other Christians, in favor of gathered churches under autonomous Puritan control.

So why are you lumping them, the witch trials, and all the rest of the autrocities they performed upon the rest of those who believe in Christianity? Keep in mind the following about our countries beginnings and views when you read the following... if you dare.



Boston Latin School in Boston, Mass. is the oldest public school in America. It was founded April 23, 1635.

It was started by Rev. John Cotton who wanted to create a school modeled after the Free Grammar School in Boston, England, in which Latin and Greek were taught. The school was publicly funded and the first classes were held in the home of Philemon Pormort, the school's master.

Believe it or not five of the 56 signers of the U.S. Constitution attended Boston Latin: John Hancock, Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Robert Treat Paine, and William Hooper.


Rev Cotton was a Puritan.




AnimusRex -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 5:55:55 PM)

FR-
I recall that saying: "If God didn't exist, someone would have to invent Him."

No idea who said it, but it is most commonly used as a snarky commentary.

But I think there is a truth to it. When we are filled with hatred, and want to inflict it on others, we need some sort of excuse, a pretext other than our own evil.

Religion provides that pretext, as does any other altruistic program- Democracy, Liberty, Justice...if a Utopian framework of goodness didn't exist, we would have to invent one, or else we would have to confront our own failings.




vincentML -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 6:25:59 PM)



quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


Until i read your comment about taking comfort from someone dying, i would have continued to engage you respectfully. Now, all bets are off. You have shown yourself to be unable to step back from your passions to see anything other than your own point of view. narrow minded is what bests describes you.


I can see where my careless sentence structure might lead you to make that assumption. In truth, the irony and comfort I was referring to was the conversion of the son to Christianity, not to Madylein's death. What a horrible accusation for you to assert without asking me for clarification. But of course your prejudice has been evident right from the beginning when you started name calling me a bigot, so why would you bother to solicit a clarification? It is not surprising sadly that you would assume the very worst without first inquiring.

Clearly a "gotcha opportunity" upon which you jumped with undisguised glee. It was a successful tactic and you do win some points as a game player but I don't see how you can take any pride in it. You reveal yourself lacking quite a lot as a respectable and humane individual. A follower of the prophet of love and mercy. Really? I don't think so.

Your name calling has continued to escalate because you simply cannot deal with the major issues. I opined the oppressiveness of Christian Orthodoxy right from the first establishment of the Puritan Theocracy and you offered no defense. I opined the oppressive and aggressive political behavior of the Christian right that continues to this date and you have no response to that.

Your game is to ignore the large questions and try to dodge around in the minutia of court rulings with this citation or that and play the Christian Victim Card.

Your game is to respond to the larger issues I posed with increasing invective and vile name calling.

I should not be surprised that you would latch on to any mis-step to continue your toxic and acerbic language when you have no rational response to the simple question of what Jesus would make of all this ostentatious celebration. It is clear you have no answer but ugly ad homonym attacks. You might wish to have a quiet discussion with your Jesus in the privacy of your heart and examine with him the undisguised rage you have displayed toward another human being. I wonder what Jesus would make of it.

Your behavior should be an embarrassment to Christians who truly believe in the dignity of man as well as love and brotherhood. Your name calling has been despicable. I have tolerated it as gently as I could but I feel dirty continuing a dialogue with someone who exhibits such unrestrained and contemptible foulness of personal attack.. If yours is an example of Christian behavior I can only wonder at how vile the extremists really are. Our dialogue - that is, my attempt at dialogue and your diatribe is ended.

Vincent




tazzygirl -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 6:40:47 PM)

I dont do "gotcha moments". You want those, go looking for a Palin supporter. This is what i mean by knowing those you are accusing.

quote:

I can see where my careless sentence structure might lead you to make that assumption. In truth, the irony and comfort I was referring to was the conversion of the son to Christianity, not to Madylein's death. What a horrible accusation for you to assert without asking me for clarification. But of course your prejudice has been evident right from the beginning when you started name calling me a bigot, so why would you bother to solicit a clarification? It is not surprising sadly that you would assume the very worst without first inquiring.


You start by admitting it was your mistake, then end up accusing me of the mistake. Man, you are some piece of work. I am clearly spoken, have no problems admitting when im wrong, and ask alot of questions when i dont understand. You, i understand perfectly, and your games arent working.

quote:

I opined the oppressiveness of Christian Orthodoxy right from the first establishment of the Puritan Theocracy and you offered no defense. I opined the oppressive and aggressive political behavior of the Christian right that continues to this date and you have no response to that.


The Christian oppressiveness as you call it, and the Puritan Theocracy that grew from that, is older than the Puritan belief. Or didnt you read the link i provided. You brush everyone, every christian, as it has been stated before, with the same brush, and, again, your games are not working.

quote:

I should not be surprised that you would latch on to any mis-step to continue your toxic and acerbic language when you have no rational response to the simple question of what Jesus would make of all this ostentatious celebration.


I suppose you did miss my comments about how people should not parade around to impress other people. Something i completely agreed with. However, celebrating a religion isnt necessarily about parading around to show off.

However, i do see you have not addressed the Muslim school prayer breaks. How.. telling.




Kirata -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 7:24:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Our dialogue... is ended.

Well that's proof enough for me that there's a God. [:D]

K.




GotSteel -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 7:41:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Religious Orthodoxy.. im assuming you are referring to religious people.


I don't think that's an accurate portrayal of his position. If you feel the need to resort to ad hominem attacks you should probably base them on positions he's actually taken.




tazzygirl -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 8:11:45 PM)

Actually, Steel, i could care less what you think. When you know, then you can accuse me of attacking. I call them as i see them. His comments about christians were way off base based upon him believing that Puritians are just like the rest. However, he never once addressed the issue of Muslims praying during school hours. His attacks, so far, have been strictly against christians.




vincentML -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 10:16:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Our dialogue... is ended.

Well that's proof enough for me that there's a God. [:D]

K.


Well gee, k, I'll bet that gave your god a big shot of confidence. Was probably feeling a little down in the mouth, a little blue and woeful hanging out there in his celestial paradise all by his lonesome self and bam! there it is, proof that he really exists. Perked him right up it did. "Gee k really likes me."

Oh wait, he's the omnipotent one, and the all knowing one, isn't he? Do you suppose it really matters whether you believe in him or not? Yeh, that's what I'm thinking. lol! No big deal.

Good night all. Nighty night, god.

Vincent




vincentML -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 10:22:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Religious Orthodoxy.. im assuming you are referring to religious people.


I don't think that's an accurate portrayal of his position. If you feel the need to resort to ad hominem attacks you should probably base them on positions he's actually taken.


Thank you, Steel, but don't waste your time. The woman takes issues and twists them or ignores them when she has no understanding or answers. She is full of blind rage. Her only tactic is ad homonym attacks and i suspect she doesn't know what that means.

Such rage. Really, what would Jesus think? lol!

A loving Christian? Nah. Tactics beneath contempt? Yep.

vincent




Kirata -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 10:33:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Well gee, k, I'll bet that gave your god a big shot of confidence. Was probably feeling a little down in the mouth, a little blue and woeful hanging out there in his celestial paradise all by his lonesome self and bam! there it is, proof that he really exists. Perked him right up it did. "Gee k really likes me."

Oh wait, he's the omnipotent one, and the all knowing one, isn't he? Do you suppose it really matters whether you believe in him or not? Yeh, that's what I'm thinking. lol! No big deal.

Good night all. Nighty night, god.

See, now this is what people having been trying to tell you. You don't really have the slightest notion of whether or not I actually believe in a "God" per se, or what my conception of Deity or the Divine might be if I do. All you are about is dropping your pants at any opportunity to shit on some bogey man in your head.

K.






tazzygirl -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/20/2009 11:14:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Religious Orthodoxy.. im assuming you are referring to religious people.


I don't think that's an accurate portrayal of his position. If you feel the need to resort to ad hominem attacks you should probably base them on positions he's actually taken.


Thank you, Steel, but don't waste your time. The woman takes issues and twists them or ignores them when she has no understanding or answers. She is full of blind rage. Her only tactic is ad homonym attacks and i suspect she doesn't know what that means.

Such rage. Really, what would Jesus think? lol!

A loving Christian? Nah. Tactics beneath contempt? Yep.

vincent



Clearly christianity is a threat to you.

San Diego schools changes ways to meet needs of Muslim students

When afternoon recess comes at an elementary school on the outskirts of San Diego, some students rush out for a quick game of hopscotch, while others gather in a room for Muslim worship. Like a growing number of school districts around the country, San Diego’s is changing its ways to meet the needs of its Islamic students. Here, a controversy with constitutional overtones has erupted: In accommodating Muslim students is the school unfairly promoting religion? The school’s policy "presumes that Christians are less religious and less inspired to worship and praise the Lord and come together," says Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute. He is asking the school district to set up special rooms where Christians can pray too. This outcry, and others like it from conservative commentators and attorneys, suggests that the whole matter may land in court. Potentially at issue is to what extent actions taken by a public school to accommodate special religious needs of some students might require similar allowances for other students. About 100 students at Carver Elementary take advantage of the prayer time. Carver revised its schedule so they would have the option to pray at the specific times ordained by their religion, says attorney Brent North, who represents the school district. A teacher is present, but cannot lead or take part in the observance.

http://www.nsba.org/MainMenu/SchoolLaw/Issues/Religion/News/SanDiegoschoolschangeswaystomeetneedsofMuslimstudents.aspx

Again, where is the atheists outcry against this. There isnt any. And the reason is simple. They arent christian.




Kirata -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/21/2009 12:30:55 AM)


Muslims are required to retire from their daily activities to pray at specific times during the day. There is no such requirement in Christianity, and therefore the notion that Christians must also be given special rooms where they can go to pray in order to accomodate their religion equally is nonsense. Furthermore, atheists do not as a rule object to the accomodation of religion. They object to being compelled to participate in religious activities.

K.







tazzygirl -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/21/2009 12:43:26 AM)

I dont think you read the article.

Five daily prayers are "part of our fundamental faith," explains Akram Shami, who volunteers at the Islamic Center of Southern California in Los Angeles. One prayer is typically performed at specific times around noon or 1 p.m., depending on the time of year, although Muslims differ on the mandated prayer times. At some public schools, students leave class momentarily or wait to pray until they get home. Mr. Shami says his faith allows prayers to be combined at a later time if necessary. The San Diego district took special action regarding the timing of recess because "the Muslim faith requires specificity of prayer obligations … that most other religions do not," Mr. North says. He denies reports that a new recess was added specifically to address the religious needs of the Muslim students. "As a constitutional law attorney, I don’t care whether kids do or don’t pray in schools. I don’t care to whom or how they pray," he says. But he adds that he does have to make sure that religious requests are treated in a neutral way.




Kirata -> RE: Believer(s) of god are plague to this world. (11/21/2009 12:59:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I dont think you read the article....

Mr. Shami says his faith allows prayers to be combined at a later time if necessary.

That's the only reason you can imagine for me disagreeing with you, eh? Well get over it.

Mr. Shami can say whatever the hell he wants, the fact remains that he does not speak for all Muslims.

For such prayers are enjoined on believers at stated times. ~Qur'an 4:103
Woe to the worshippers, who are neglectful of their prayers. ~Qur'an 107:4-5


What constitutes "if necessary" in this context would be subject to considerable debate.

K.







Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875