porcelaine -> RE: Coining new phrase about what I want (10/19/2009 10:54:55 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leadership527 The last time I wrote about what I thought in this space, the pitchforks and torches came out. I'm not really up for inciting a riot again. It serves no useful purpose. the premise of what he's proposing has a definite problem. someone seeking the level of surrender as a slave is going to want something vastly different than the girl who prefers handing over less control. how does he market this with a blanket term that fails to take into account that obedience is one portion of the dynamic, not all of it. if the obedient submissive has no desire to yield as a slave, does that imply she's not obedient? what about the reverse. if he picks up the slave but has no desire to own, then what? she's obedient, but slavery has its own tenets. is he willing to go between either extreme based on who he meets? and is this going to be articulated as well? or is the girl expected to conform to a way of being that bears its own definition instead? if she self identifies as either. would it suggest that she must be willing to embrace living in another way. the sub who becomes a slave or the slave who becomes a sub? porcelaine
|
|
|
|