kittinSol -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/24/2009 6:37:45 AM)
|
From the ABC link: "While the litigants object to the invasion of privacy, their lawsuit challenges the law on more technical grounds. It charges that House Bill 1595 covers more than one subject and therefore violates the state constitution. The plaintiffs hope to delay implementation of the law and the planned March 1, 2010, launch of the Web site. " You would have thought that Sen. Todd Lamb, of Edmond, and Rep. Dan Sullivan, of Tulsa, had more important things to do with their time than try to victimise women because of the medical choices they make. They say this law is to "protect the sanctity of life", but they obviously have no regards for the lives of the women that will be wrecked by their disgusting and evil legislation.
|
|
|
|