Kooth
Posts: 16
Joined: 8/17/2004 Status: offline
|
I'm glad for your responses, too, Maltor. I don't always think my own opinions through until someone has given me incentive and I'm trying to find the right/best words to describe them. I try to be explicit about connotations I attach to words, too, because your 'fix' and my definition of fix are different, as is the meaning of slut for different people that is being discussed elsewhere. If I'm providing support and that serves the same purpose as a bandaid, sure they get over or heal faster than without me. Or if, using my earlier analogy, the bone didn't heal right if they hadn't used a crutch but just walked on it while it was trying to set, then yes, I'm a fix. I was intentionally narrowing the meaning to a fix of the original problem, eliminating the cause of hurt, or by my hand changing the circumstances that led to the pain. My ex would not have been able to go out and find additional lovers if not for my steady support, so in a way, I was part of the problem, too. I 'enabled' her to feel hurt by providing a secure home and relationship, and enabled her to get over it, too. I'm probably emphasizing what she (and other ex's) told me she wanted: to be able to share her hurt without me feeling like I had to jump up and do something. I think that is a natural reaction for anyone who feels they are a provider or protector for someone else. Plus, I think it's also a gender role, men want to act, while women want to, uh, feel? Listen? What's the opposite of act, react? Don't hold me to that, though, I know it's not true everywhere, just a stereotype. Cliches and stereotypes do hold some water, just not as much as we think. But I do agree from your POV. Looking forward to more discussions with you, too.
|