quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

I'll lay bets down right now that this was no conspiracy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I am confused…I thought Limppa was for the US participation in Afghanistan and Iraq. If this is so… how can he call the President almost at fault for doing exactly what he is supporting? That is like saying he is at fault too.

Butch

Yes, you are confused. Rush's statement was about Hasan's belief that we shouldnt be in Afghanistan and Iraq, not his own opinion. Then, since Hasan thinks we should be out, Obama promised we would be out, we arent out, therfore BO is "almost at fault". (I dont agree with that leap. There are possibly more concrete ways to lay it at BOs feet).

Interesting that you never chose to say factual way to lay it at "BOs feet"....basically all your interested in is something with a little more meat on the bones heh willbeur.Does concrete hold a moral equivalency to factual...or is it more of a less tenuous link your looking for ,not so important on whether its true or not...just as long as the shit sticks?

Please restate in English.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales


Gee...how awful it is that faced with a complex and difficult decision, to take time to think about it, gather information and make an informed decision. Some of the presidents we had would never do such an awful thing, would they?

If he actually had some basis to question McChrystal you might have a point. He doesnt, you dont.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

I find it bizzare that people think Rush is just speaking off the cuff and these little bombs he drops aren't scripted to allow them to be parsed into 'no big deal' by his supporters when they try and defend him in public.