OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
Actually the angle, where the eyes look, head and hand position have a lot to do with it. So if something is going to be critqued, how we bowed would be a more applicable and substantial item to discuss. All I know is that if I were Obama, after that incident, I would fire whoever prepped me on the bow, if I had been taught incorrectly. But in the grand scope of things, it is like fucking up a handshake, which many people do. The spirit of ettiquette was upheld, and the mission of diplomacy was the goal, so while a minor thing, angle is a debate of substance. quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail The fact that other people ignore the diplomacy and manners of it, are the ones who should be villified Ron, I'm not against Obama bowing. I think making overmuch of it is a crock of shit, as far as that goes. But jeez, you know the etiquette of bowing. Equals bow equally. Ferchrissake, look at the man. A standing bow is normally 15-30 degrees. Obama practically has his face in the guy's crotch. It's inappropriate. I don't mean that bowing is inappropriate. I mean bowing inappropriately is inappropriate. Really? Has the endless Obama criticism been reduced to the actual angle of his bowing? This has just become too ridiculous.
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|