LaTigresse
Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009 i was perusing journal entries, when i came across this. These are not my own words. Moreover, i don't feel the need to identify the profile that i got these from, since i don't want the author to get unkind messages. Rather, i thought it might be interesting to get the reaction of the Mistresses to his ideas. Here is an excerpt from the journal that got me thinking about this: "Using your looks to get what you want is not dominance.. Its persuasion and seduction. Both parties fall victim to submission in that act. I'm beginning to question the whole female aspect of dominance..... Nature has intended for females to be submissive and men to be dominant. With that said, true dominance in a female would be a woman with literally a masculine style mind, strength not only mentally but physically. To never want to "be" fucked,, but to "do" the fucking. The "typical female dominant" of today is not a true definition of raw dominance. In fact i dont even know what to call it. Because its not fake.. but its not exactly real either." My reaction to the above, specifically the parts I bolded, is that the person that wrote it is insecure and fearful. Most people that feel the need to stridently proclaim the strong dominant male natural order of things, tend to be. What their reasons are, is probably as varied as the people themselves. I've seen it in both genders and it is equally unattractive in either. Certainly there can be a physicality in dominance. However I do not believe that it is a requirement. If it were, no one would be. The biggest strongest men can be brought down by the weakest individual given today's technology. Regardless the tools, be they physical or otherwise, it is about the will of the persons involved. Someone has to have the desire and will to dominate and someone has to have the will to submit. To make it an over simplified notion of who is the strongest physically does dominants of both genders a huge disservice. Consider this, if saying a man is only capable of being dominant to those he can physically over power, that is equally as insulting. In addition, even the strongest man will eventually weaken physically. Is he no longer dominant?
< Message edited by LaTigresse -- 11/30/2009 7:19:12 AM >
_____________________________
My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one! Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!
|