AnimusRex
Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006 Status: offline
|
For the record- I do not give a crap about the delta smelt; but it is a little bit more than that, isn't it? The San Francisco Bay/ Delta From the Sierra Club: The Bay-Delta is also the hub of the state's water system, supplying water to more than 22 million Californians and over 7 million acres of farmland. Our dependence on the Bay-Delta has led to its ecological collapse. Today: On average, about half of the fresh water that once flowed naturally into the Bay-Delta is diverted to San Joaquin Valley agribusiness and cities All but one of the major tributaries to the Bay-Delta are dammed More than 90 percent of the Bay's original wetlands are lost to development, dredging and landfill Winter Run Chinook salmon populations have declined by more than 90 percent since the early 1970s California has lost 75 percent of its commercial salmon fishing boats over the last 15 years The recreational fishing industry has lost $6 billion over the last 25 years 88 million pounds of pesticides and toxic chemicals flow into the Bay each year Chemicals in Bay Area fish are known to cause cancer, birth defects, and other health problems in humans Hey, but other than that, things are great! The reason the delta smelt was acted upon, is that it is an indicator species, signalling the collapse of the entire ecosystem; salmon, crops, everything. We are poisoning the very water we depend on. Much of the water is being used for things like cotton and rice, that are exhausting the farmlands, since they are so water-intensive. Smarter, less water-intensive crops could be planted instead- but this would require long term thinking and policy leadership.
< Message edited by AnimusRex -- 12/7/2009 5:36:17 PM >
|