RE: long term prolonged restraint (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


persephonee -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/18/2009 4:33:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

quote:

ORIGINAL: persephonee

how did i miss this one?[8|]


You were lucky?


well, i dont know about lucky, but i def missed this lil ditty.....so, while ive got you here....wanna strap me to a chair?[:D]




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/18/2009 6:51:27 AM)

Only if you help me clean my house!




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/18/2009 10:42:47 AM)

In case you hadn't noticed ....I'm heer lukin fr bondij n abyoos.If i want a degree in english i'll go to the open university.Bet you don't have a mobile phone,text speak l prob av u...rendered senceless.




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/18/2009 10:57:42 AM)

I can barely translate that. Since when did an inability to communicate clearly become something to be proud of? [8|]




Scotty306134 -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/18/2009 11:04:53 AM)

I recommend putting the chair in the front yard. That way the mailman and passersby can moniter You during the day and Your doms can take over at night. You my even get lucky and find a local Judge to put You in extended bondage in a safe enviroment! Scotty




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/18/2009 11:07:37 AM)

Jail was already suggested. The OP wasn't a fan. [:D]




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/18/2009 6:13:55 PM)

Thank god for that,i'ts realy hard to sus pople out on these sites but you've given me an insght into just how shallow people can be & it makes me wonder .in light of alll your contiuing negative feedbacck , how many of my posts you've actualy read.You keep replying but your so stuck in your own tame reality that you don't even stop to think about anyone elses needs,if it don't siut you then it must be wrong,you told me in a previous post that you make a note of ensuring that your sub gets what he wants before entering ino a scenario & then you tell me that whenever i consider what i want thats selfishness,& now i discover that you don't even read posts,i guess you just flick over them then impose your special wisdom,ye cors you do.I still like the dress though pitty it's miss shalow thats wearing it.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 2:58:50 AM)

In the old days jail & psyciatric institutions were great,they used to put people in straight jackets & strap them down,unfortunately they don't do that any more so theres no point commiting crimes.Believe you me if jail & psychiatric facilities were the same now as they used to be i would faening allsorts & kicking up a fuss just to get restrained.The thought of being manhandeled into a secure room/padded cell with a straight jacket ready or taken to a dongeon & chained up is the most erotic & sexy thing i can imagine,apart from my own kink of course.




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 3:11:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

Thank god for that,i'ts realy hard to sus pople out on these sites but you've given me an insght into just how shallow people can be & it makes me wonder .in light of alll your contiuing negative feedbacck , how many of my posts you've actualy read.You keep replying but your so stuck in your own tame reality that you don't even stop to think about anyone elses needs,if it don't siut you then it must be wrong,you told me in a previous post that you make a note of ensuring that your sub gets what he wants before entering ino a scenario & then you tell me that whenever i consider what i want thats selfishness,& now i discover that you don't even read posts,i guess you just flick over them then impose your special wisdom,ye cors you do.I still like the dress though pitty it's miss shalow thats wearing it.

I've been trying very hard to not be insulting but... are you on something?

I'm the sub. I told you I think about what the dominant is going get out of the scene, exactly what I've been trying to get you to do.

I never told you you are selfing for wanting what you want. I said you are being selfish for not giving consideration to what the dominant is going to get out of it because getting to torture you over a long period of time is most likely not going to be worth the risks.

I have been reading your posts. You were insulting to another poster and in that one post were almost unreadable. Evidently you have not been reading my posts and just scanning them before starting another birage of meaningless insults whose sole effect is to amuse me while I pack our toy bag.

quote:


In the old days jail & psyciatric institutions were great,they used to put people in straight jackets & strap them down,unfortunately they don't do that any more so theres no point commiting crimes.Believe you me if jail & psychiatric facilities were the same now as they used to be i would faening allsorts & kicking up a fuss just to get restrained.The thought of being manhandeled into a secure room/padded cell with a straight jacket ready or taken to a dongeon & chained up is the most erotic & sexy thing i can imagine,apart from my own kink of course.

You know were we were joking right?

Of course... the reality is that if you did it that would be incredibly selfish. You'd be getting your kink at the non-consenting taxpayers expense and likely taking up resources that someone else actually needs.




CruelNUnsual -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 3:34:58 AM)

strapchair, the responses here are so over the top its silly. Your long term restraint scene is relatively tame compared to some of the extremes of medical play and mutually agreed to torture that Ive seen. Ive orchestrated several scenes where restraint for over a week played a large role, although not exclusively in a chair. However it wasnt the restraint itself that was the focus, rather they were fear play scenes where the objective was inducing/experiencing shit-in-the-pants terror. The logistics of a scene primarily limited to long term restraint are not all that difficult, and the fear of risk presented here is way overblown. There are risks in almost any kind of play, but if its their kink they minimize the physical/mental/legal ramifications. Ive known of a couple of instances where the sub was caged 24/7 for years, sometimes forced to stand for days at a time.

You may not find the top you are looking for online, though, things tend to be pretty mild in this community. Public play clubs/dungeons may provide some leads, but as you point out they are light play as well. It will take some time and research to find more extreme private groups where they will entertain the idea, although they may want to add their own special twists to the incarceration. Enjoy the search!




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 3:39:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

Ive orchestrated several scenes where restraint for over a week played a large role, although not exclusively in a chair.

It's the exclusively in the chair that has people raising questions.
quote:


Ive known of a couple of instances where the sub was caged 24/7 for years, sometimes forced to stand for days at a time.

Interesting. Could you provide more information on how it was accomplished? Safety, health, how the sub's absence was explained to family and friends, etc. I'm always looking to learn. [:)]

Edited to make gender neutral since I typed her out of habit...




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 3:57:57 AM)

By it's very nature my kink is all giving.I am giving my whole person/body to anyone who wishes to abuse me in what ever way they choose,all i am asking in return is that i am securely restrained in a restraint that is of my likeing.I am willing to suply everything pertaining to this scenario,the chair,web cam.cctv,voice monitors etc etc to to make this scenario doable.If any wouldbe siuters get in touch they have done so because they choose to based on my profile & i would not dive into this head first,there would be extensive dialog between me & the potential siuter.This scenario would only begin when an agreement was reached that siuted all parties.I cannot possibly tell you what the outcome to this would be until it has actualy been decided based upon any future dialog i may undertake with any potencial siuters.As for any insults i may have made,it wasn't meant literaly,i find that people who can't understand something always respond negatively & i know my kink is so extremely strange that people find it hard to get there heads around,i am not a negative or bad person but it is hard trying to make people understand the extreme nature of what i am proposing.As for the ununderstandeble text that i posted earlier,that was in responce to a previous post i recieved from someone basicaly telling me to that my spelling was not very good.Sorry for any upset it was not meant.By the way i meant it when i said i love the dress,nice one.Been looking for one on ebay.




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:12:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

By it's very nature my kink is all giving.I am giving my whole person/body to anyone who wishes to abuse me in what ever way they choose,all i am asking in return is that i am securely restrained in a restraint that is of my likeing.

That's the same as me saying my kink is very giving because they can do whatever they want as long as they use whips on me. It's really not that giving. It's just your kink that you want to fill.
quote:


I am willing to suply everything pertaining to this scenario,the chair,web cam.cctv,voice monitors etc etc to to make this scenario doable.

This is more what I've been asking about. To do this, the dominant incurs a lot of risk. Potential jail time if anything goes wrong and you expire.

High risk behavior requires a high reward. Just restraining someone and getting to torture them isn't going to be unique to them. Which is why I keep saying "What else can you offer? How can you make this easier, and therefore more enticing?"
quote:


If any wouldbe siuters get in touch they have done so because they choose to based on my profile & i would not dive into this head first,there would be extensive dialog between me & the potential siuter.This scenario would only begin when an agreement was reached that siuted all parties.I cannot possibly tell you what the outcome to this would be until it has actualy been decided based upon any future dialog i may undertake with any potencial siuters.

Which is all well and good. However, I feel that, given the potential risk (even though it is unlikely death is very hard to fix and the possiblity of the dominant going to jail is not to be taken lightly) you need to be thinking a lot more about the potential top now. If nothing else, it's going to show that you've looked at things from all angles and will probably be reassuring to the interested dominant.
quote:


As for any insults i may have made,it wasn't meant literaly,i find that people who can't understand something always respond negatively

Ok... you called me tame, said talking to you was probably the closest thing I've come to anything real, said you feel sorry for any man who ends up with me, and that I'm probably a 60 year old man.

Don't try to backpedal now.
quote:



& i know my kink is so extremely strange that people find it hard to get there heads around,i am not a negative or bad person but it is hard trying to make people understand the extreme nature of what i am proposing.

No - people get that it's extreme. That's why we've been advocating you think about it from all angles. No one has said you are a bad person, though your insults and then attempting to say they aren't insults doesn't give me a high opinion of you. Which I know you don't care about.
quote:


As for the ununderstandeble text that i posted earlier,that was in responce to a previous post i recieved from someone basicaly telling me to that my spelling was not very good.

Your spelling isn't good and your posts are very hard to read. If hearing that upsets you to the point of insulting others, consider running your posts through spellcheck and using the enter button more often so that it isn't one huge block of text. That's not an insult, it's simply the truth and some advice.
quote:


Sorry for any upset it was not meant.By the way i meant it when i said i love the dress,nice one.Been looking for one on ebay.

As I said, I'm not upset. You calling me tame, a man, and saying that you feel sorry for any guy who ends up with me was honestly amusing to my owner and I. They were insults and I don't believe you for a second that they weren't meant. They were just entirely ineffective.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:16:51 AM)

Yes i know what i am looking for is pretty extreme & the responses i recieve bear that out & living in the uk seems to be a detriment but the fact is this is the only kink i have so i will persue it for as long as it takes.I know in my heart of hearts that there is someone out there in the uk who would be willing to undertake such a scinario,finding them is a whole different matter but i'll keep looking.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:25:48 AM)

Did you realy read my last post to you in it's entirety.I have said time & time again that any siuters would only respond if they thought that what i were proposing was interesting to them & extensive dialog would eventualy glean a mutualy agreed arrangement.If you find that hard to understand then sobeit.Thats why i think your tame,everything you have told me in previous posts is either tame or your scenario.I don't know how much you charge but i would'nt pay for it.




sirsholly -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:26:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

In the old days jail & psyciatric institutions were great,they used to put people in straight jackets & strap them down,unfortunately they don't do that any more so theres no point commiting crimes.Believe you me if jail & psychiatric facilities were the same now as they used to be i would faening allsorts & kicking up a fuss just to get restrained
yeah...they were freakin' awesome. The restraints were used just prior to the lobotomies and electoshock therapies that left the patient with some level of brain damage...often debilitating and turning them into non-functioning vegetables.

How sad the medical science now has medications, from antidepressants to antipsychotics, which prevent these atrocities.

Dude...get a fucking grip.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:27:48 AM)

& by the way i realy wish that this pillock with the spelling fetish would sod off.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:32:15 AM)

Ah well if you want to put your own twist on it & make it a negative as possible thats your perogative.You mentioned the labotomies,don't know where that came from,oh hang on it came from you.Whos the sick one.




sirsholly -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:37:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

Ah well if you want to put your own twist on it & make it a negative as possible thats your perogative.You mentioned the labotomies,don't know where that came from,oh hang on it came from you.
you mentioned how glorious the olden days of psychiatric care were.....lobotomies were a standard back then.




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:38:04 AM)

 
quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

Did you realy read my last post to you in it's entirety.I have said time & time again that any siuters would only respond if they thought that what i were proposing was interesting to them & extensive dialog would eventualy glean a mutualy agreed arrangement.If you find that hard to understand then sobeit.Thats why i think your tame,everything you have told me in previous posts is either tame or your scenario.I don't know how much you charge but i would'nt pay for it.


Ugh, here we go again...

Yes, yes you think I'm tame. I don't give a shit. Stop being a broken record.

I know that people will only respond if they are interested. That's pretty much the biggest "duh" of the year. HOWEVER what I have been saying is that you are only thinking about you and you'll attract more people when you start thinking about them and therefore increase your odds of getting your kink met.

And, by the way, where on earth did you get the impression that I'm a pro? Again, not offended, but you seem to have an interesting ability to read my posts and imagine things in them about me that aren't true.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875