RE: long term prolonged restraint (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:39:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

& by the way i realy wish that this pillock with the spelling fetish would sod off.


I'm sure you do. It's so rude of people to request clear communication. Now tell me I'm tame some more.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:42:54 AM)

labottomies are crap,i was refering to the methods of restraint.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:52:11 AM)

It's a nice pic but iv'e sen loads of nice pics that don't reflect the people they pertain to.Call me a sinic,sorry about the spelling,but the amount of people i have spoken to over a long period of time just to find that there only interested in getting off one over there messages is pretty staggering,it seems to me that these sites are full of them.The fact that you believe an amicable arrangement by consenting adults is somehow selfish & all about me defies belief,isn't that the basis for all relationships or have i missed the point.




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:57:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

It's a nice pic but iv'e sen loads of nice pics that don't reflect the people they pertain to.

You are the only one bringing my picture/clothing/appearence into this.
quote:


Call me a sinic,sorry about the spelling,but the amount of people i have spoken to over a long period of time just to find that there only interested in getting off one over there messages is pretty staggering,it seems to me that these sites are full of them.

Sorry but I can't understand this part of your post. Do you mean people who just want to get off over the internet and not actually meet up?
quote:


The fact that you believe an amicable arrangement by consenting adults is somehow selfish & all about me defies belief,isn't that the basis for all relationships or have i missed the point.

Yes you have actually. Repeatedly.

Amicable arrangements by consenting adults are not selfish. Utterly refusing to consider what you can provide beyond a warm body is.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 4:58:34 AM)

I would'nt dream of picking you up on your spelling.The fact is that with text speak,emails etc etc & migtration around the world,language is a constantly elvolving thing,as long as people know what your talking about there should'nt be any problem unless you decide to create one.Theres lots of spellings in the oed that have changed,some substancialy,over the decades so if you want to be pedantic speak to them,personaly i can't be arsed,your problem not mine.




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:01:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

I would'nt dream of picking you up on your spelling.

Huh? I never said you would.
quote:


The fact is that with text speak,emails etc etc & migtration around the world,language is a constantly elvolving thing,as long as people know what your talking about there should'nt be any problem unless you decide to create one.Theres lots of spellings in the oed that have changed,some substancialy,over the decades so if you want to be pedantic speak to them,personaly i can't be arsed,your problem not mine.

You might care to remember that I never fussed about your spelling. I just said that it is bad  when you insulted someone for drawing attention to it - which it is. And while spellings do evolve they do so to improve communication, not make things harder to read.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:10:13 AM)

I don't know whos post i'm replying to coz there seem to be quit a lot.But pertaining to the dress,it's lovely & the fact that you noticed that i noticed it is surely not bad a thing otherwise you would'nt have posted the pic in the first place.And as for the post regarding the 'people getting off just reading posts,you know who you are.As for the selfishness post,i don't get it.Amicable arangements by consenting adults is just that,in what tiny bit of you singlemined brain tells you that an AMICABLE AGREED ARRANGEMENT is somehow selfish.




sirsholly -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:15:07 AM)

quote:

sinic,
cynic 




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:17:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

I don't know whos post i'm replying to coz there seem to be quit a lot.

Ahhh. You've been making your posts so that they say "in reply to AquaticSub" in the corner. You can change that by clicking the reply button on the post you are actually responding to. No biggie. [:)]
quote:


But pertaining to the dress,it's lovely & the fact that you noticed that i noticed it is surely not bad a thing otherwise you would'nt have posted the pic in the first place.

I posted it cause it's a cute pic of me and we're looking for another partner. I just don't see what it has to do with the topic at hand.
quote:


And as for the post regarding the 'people getting off just reading posts,you know who you are.As for the selfishness post,i don't get it.Amicable arangements by consenting adults is just that,in what tiny bit of you singlemined brain tells you that an AMICABLE AGREED ARRANGEMENT is somehow selfish.


You didn't read my post and you are getting insulting again. It doesn't make your stance any stronger.

An amicable arrangement is not selfish. I have never said such. You continue to put words in my mouth and not actually read my posts.

What is selfish is the notion that that the bottom doesn't need to consider the tops needs or offer anything beyond a warm body to make the HUGE risk in your extreme fantasy more appealing.

That has nothing to do with any agreement but the mindset of the bottom only. If you still think I'm talking about a potential agreement, reread this post till you get it.

By the way - notice how I'm managing to disagree with you without insulting you.




Aileen1968 -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:18:28 AM)

At this point I kinda hope you find someone to fulfill this fantasy....and they never let you go...




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:19:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

sinic,
cynic 


Damn it Holly, now you are winding him up further and my ass still isn't being grabbed!




sirsholly -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:23:22 AM)

[image]http://www.millan.net/minimations/smileys/consoling1.gif[/image] i sowwy




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:24:39 AM)

You are so lucky you are cute...




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:28:52 AM)

So do i & i'll hope that my captives keep you informed.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:31:47 AM)

Ye thanks for that but i keep getting posts all grouped together.Pretty hot topic eh.




strapchair -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:34:51 AM)

I'm not trying to be insulting but i only seem to get posts from people that are negative.I know what i want is extreme to say the least but i am only fighting my corner.




AquaticSub -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (12/19/2009 5:42:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

I'm not trying to be insulting but i only seem to get posts from people that are negative.I know what i want is extreme to say the least but i am only fighting my corner.


What is there to fight about? No one is trying to stop you.




Phoenix73Sir -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (5/12/2010 7:23:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: strapchair

Thank god for that,i'ts realy hard to sus pople out on these sites but you've given me an insght into just how shallow people can be & it makes me wonder .in light of alll your contiuing negative feedbacck , how many of my posts you've actualy read.You keep replying but your so stuck in your own tame reality that you don't even stop to think about anyone elses needs,if it don't siut you then it must be wrong,you told me in a previous post that you make a note of ensuring that your sub gets what he wants before entering ino a scenario & then you tell me that whenever i consider what i want thats selfishness,& now i discover that you don't even read posts,i guess you just flick over them then impose your special wisdom,ye cors you do.I still like the dress though pitty it's miss shalow thats wearing it.


Pot..... Kettle.... Black much??  Jeez.

So what you are wanting isn't my thing.. alot of things arent 'my thing' either but I don't look down on those who's thing it is. However I am going to side with some of the posters here in this much.

You have been asked on a number of occasions how you intend to ensure your own safety should your captor truely be neglectful and your health begins to dangerously deteriorate. but you have refused to do so.  (this indicates a lack of simple safety in just about everyone's eyes)

You have also failed to even acknowledge the point made which was What is in it for the Captor to make the very serious and very labour intensive responsibility of ensuring your health, well-being, safety and also the ramifications if by some unlucky coincidence things DO go wrong. (only takes one postman with a special delivery to peer into the wrong window and alert the authorities you know...)  Personal I would want one hell of a pay-off to even considered undertaking THAT much work.

No-one here is trying to disrespect your wants or kink, but they ARE trying to make sure you really have thought this through.  No matter how well studied you think you are.. an outside perspective can help highlight areas where you may need to research further.

I think you're going to have a difficult time finding someone who will take this on, but I do wish you well in your search but more importantly your research.




sinandhoney -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (5/12/2010 9:29:34 PM)

This is the reason I stopped referring to myself as a switch and just a Sadist/submissive. I got sick of all the men who would approach me as a tool for them to get their kink off. There was no interest in me or what I wanted or like, just their fantasy and what they wanted done to them. For me to want to do this to someone one they had better make it damn attractive to me, and not just feed me the line that I can do as I please to them as long as I submit to their scene. How demeaning as a Domme/Sadist/Top to have someone approach me not for who I am but for what they need, shit pay a prostitute if all you need is a warm body.




ishyB -> RE: long term prolonged restraint (5/12/2010 10:10:40 PM)


~FR~

Hey guys, I have a brilliant solution for this problem...

The question has been what he can provide other than a warm body, right? (Well aside from safety concerns... but lets be realistic here and forget about those for a moment...)

Well, in that topic Is slavery your Divine Destiny  the polyfarmcouple is looking for "worker bee" slaves to proof read, right?

Well, proof reading can be done from a... *drum roll* ... CHAIR!

So all strapchair really has to do is actually learn how to spell, and he's set! He's got something to offer! And in the meantime, polyfarmcouple have got their wishes fulfilled too!

This is one of those two-bird-with-one-stone kinda solutions.

*Sarcasm off*





Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875