mnottertail
Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004 Status: offline
|
Uck what has controlled the epidemic then? and you take a made for tv movie as reality? On April 2, 1987, Reagan said: "How that information is used must be up to schools and parents, not government. But let's be honest with ourselves, AIDS information can not be what some call 'value neutral.' After all, when it comes to preventing AIDS, don't medicine and morality teach the same lessons." FY 1989 show that Reagan proposed at least $2.79 billion for AIDS research, education, and treatment....... little and late, I am not saying that he ignored aids completely, it just wasn't high on the radar. “You're president of the United States," Nancy Reagan, reminded Ronald Reagan as he sat up in bed in 1983. She begged him to do something about the growing scourge of AIDS. "If you don't talk about it, nobody will talk about it. Nobody will do anything, and all these people — these children, these young boys — they're all going to die. And the blame will be on our heads, Ronnie." President Reagan quietly kept reading through his half glasses. He seemed very cozy, clad in his bathrobe, beneath his blankets. "Ronnie, say something," Nancy pleaded. The president coolly maintained his silence. He never even looked at his beloved First Lady. That's how Showtime Sunday night depicted a scene from the White House residence in The Reagans, the controversial TV movie about the conservative chief executive and his devoted wife. Reagan's alleged homophobia and indifference to AIDS patients are among the reasons Reaganites attacked the program, leading CBS to cancel its broadcast premiere and shift it instead to Showtime, the network's sister pay-cable channel. The original script was far worse. "Those who live in sin will die in sin," says President Reagan, as portrayed by actor James Brolin. Teleplaywright Elizabeth Egloff eventually admitted she had no evidence on which to base this scandalous comment. "We know he ducked the issue over and over again," she told the New York Times in self-defense. Is any of this fair? thats a made for tv movie too!!!! I buy yours, you buy mine? Free-marketeers may argue that the federal government should have left AIDS research and care to the private sector. Whether or not one embraces that perspective, no one justifiably can regard Reagan's requested and actual AIDS spending as a gleefully applied death sentence for AIDS sufferers. From his state of the union: We will continue, as a high priority, the fight against Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). An unprecedented research effort is underway to deal with this major epidemic public health threat. The number of AIDS cases is expected to increase. While there are hopes for drugs and vaccines against AIDS, none is immediately at hand. Consequently, efforts should focus on prevention, to inform and to lower risks of further transmission of the AIDS virus. To this end, I am asking the Surgeon General to prepare a report to the American people on AIDS. So, he like Sarah Palin, was big on abstinence, and people got pregnant under her roof and on her watch, and people died under his roof and on his watch. so, 2.9 bill, you want to look up what he spent on all his little wars including Iran/Iraq, Nicaragua, and so on yourself? Ron
_____________________________
Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30
|