hardbodysub
Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005 Status: offline
|
The reason stated seems so ridiculous that IMO you're not missing anything by this particular rejection. That is my position on any such issues. I agree with you that anyone is free to make any rule or reason they like for accepting or rejecting others for personal relationships. From my end, if I don't meet someone else's criteria, it doesn't really matter what the criteria is, it's water under the bridge. However, it's easier to take if their criteria is really foolish; that means that they're too whacko for me to want them anyway. There's a difference between arguing over the reason and just wanting to make sure there hasn't been a misunderstanding. The only time that I have an issue with a stated reason for rejection is when the reason doesn't fit, and it seems that there might be a misunderstanding of some sort. For example, if she says the reason for rejecting me is that she doesn't want to live BDSM 24/7, I'd feel obliged to ask her why she thought that disqualified me, because I never said I needed or even wanted that. Unfortunately, once someone has made up their mind, they usually view any question as an argument. I once received an email from a domme which included "I am sure I am the domme for you". After my reply, her subsequent message was a rejection with no reason. Normally not a problem, but this was pretty confusing, so I asked her to help me understand what the reason was, and she angrily retorted that my questioning of her was exactly the problem - that I wasn't willing to accept her decision, and therefore wasn't really submissive. I calmly pointed out that I wasnt trying to change her mind, but merely asking how she suddenly went from "I am sure I am the domme for you" to "I am not interested in pursuing this". Turns out that it was a typo - she meant to write "I am NOT sure I am the domme for you". Do you think she apologized? Of course not. No loss to me.
|