quote:

but a hardon of a male is not the same as a pussy's wetting, the one is a call for action while the other is surrendering

Since when is a wet pussy not a call for action?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bibiswitch


but having a hardon by being humiliated is too contradicting to be explained by simply 'a pleasant stimulation causes erection'

for women who enjoy humiliation, it is more understandable, since she needs to feel dirty, surrendered, etc in order to put aside her sexual inhibitions and her pussy gets wet because her mind thinks that now that her master knows she is a slut, she will fuck her, etc etc

but a hardon of a male is not the same as a pussy's wetting, the one is a call for action while the other is surrendering

quote:

I am interested in male sub/slave experience, since it is clear the woman's perspective for me

quote:

ORIGINAL: bibiswitch

hello

I often read about male subs/slaves that get a hardon when a woman humiliates them, insults them, is aggressive to them, etc
Some men can get a hard on when the wind blows in the right direction. Especially if the wind blows around a female
does this hardon means that you truly enjoy this?
If he didnt like it, he wouldnt want to be around it for long
or it is just a sign of your body that tells you 'you are attacked, you must defend and fight'? Ive never seen a dick get into a fighting stance, Ive never seen an erection want to fight... they are kinda doomed ...., willy whacking aside, what good is an erection in a fight??? apart from as a target?
it is a subconscious aggression that is expressed through erection?
maybe this hardon is because you normally supress your sexual insticts against normal women and you just need a reason to express your sexuality? why would he supress his normal sexual instincts?
and your humiliation from a woman simply gives a reason to your mind (subconsciously) that it is now ok to... ahm... rape her? since she attacks you, you have a valid reason to rape her.
My gawd you have never had a male submissive have you. I doubt you have ever even spoken to one in depth

what do you think about that? Mod 11 will castigate me long before you ever get to find out what I think about that

I mean, ok, one could accept that you enjoy serving your love object, a woman (all vanilla people do it)
one could also accept to sacrifice something from yourself to feel yourself how much you like that woman (vanilla people do it too) so submissive men are vanilla??

but having a hardon by being humiliated is too contradicting to be explained by simply 'a pleasant stimulation causes erection'

for women who enjoy humiliation, it is more understandable(why),
since she needs to feel dirty, surrendered, etc in order to put aside her sexual inhibitions (says who)
and her pussy gets wet because her mind thinks that now that her master knows she is a slut, she will fuck her, etc etc ( My pussy gets wet for a whole lot of different reasons than that)

but a hardon of a male is not the same as a pussy's wetting, the one is a call for action while the other is surrendering
It is? Im surrendering??? every time I get wet???OMG noooo That is the funniest bunch of BS I have ever heard

or you don't have a hardon?
what do you really think and feel at that moment?

I am interested in male sub/slave experience, since it is clear the woman's perspective for me
I dont think you are thinking of anyones perspective but your own

quote:

ORIGINAL: bibiswitch


HandSolo, I doubt you have the answer to the paradox of masochism that occupies so many scientists... and I didn't gave an answer, it has a question mark, I just mentioned some scientific thoughts about this, if you want to blame someone, just blame some scientists then

really, don't answer with stupid posts, if you don't like this subject, IGNORE IT, you have too much free time, right? LOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: servilething

I get very aroused sexually in the sense I have a mental state that is pure sex, but without getting hard. I think it has to do with submission being more submissive the less selfish it is, and having an erection and wanting to cum would be selfish, and about me, while remaining passive is about serving them. I also think erections are highly independent of anyone and just happen whenever they want to, for reasons of their own, or none at all. In submission I would be hard if it was required but otherwise soft. If I was to be dominant I would probably be a walking hard-on. It may be that submission suits me because it suppresses my sexual desires as they would normally be, and instead puts me in a state of mind that allows me strong erotic feelings focused on someone else, and what turns them on. It could be a matter of vicarious sexual satisfaction.I think it is, because some of the best and most intense orgasms I have had weren't mine, but were from someone else and resonated through me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slavekal

quote:

ORIGINAL: HandSolo

quote:

ORIGINAL: bibiswitch


HandSolo, I doubt you have the answer to the paradox of masochism that occupies so many scientists... and I didn't gave an answer, it has a question mark, I just mentioned some scientific thoughts about this, if you want to blame someone, just blame some scientists then

really, don't answer with stupid posts, if you don't like this subject, IGNORE IT, you have too much free time, right? LOL

Good. Remain ignorant. Not my problem. By the way, I know science. My career is in science. Making unsupported assertions that fit a pre-determined conclusion is not science.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Bibi,

If you are going to attempt the fraud of appearing as intelligent, learn to fuckin' spell, to take someone to task one should be perfectly punctilious in one's spelling and phrasing.

And no one gives the glimmer of a fuck about what sort of answers you want or are acceptable to you on this thread, regardless of your starting it, or enjoining it. You are not the threadmaster, you are just another nobody in a vast nothingness. Learn to appreciate the perspective.

Ron