quote:

I cant recall who did that video awhile back about the guy talking on the phone envisioning this playboy type gorgeous sensual female, when in reality it was this overweight, older lady ironing while talking to this man who called one of those 1-800 sex numbers. Priceless!

You can relate that to online also.....you never know who you may be corresponding to......a dominant, a wanker, a sexually deprived husband, or someone of the opposite sex.

But to reply specifically to the OPs observation.....its just like in vanilla life...people view their experiences as the cup half full, while others choose half empty....you make the decision whos cup you are interested in.

and in giving reverence to someone by addressing them with a title? For those who need titles, it is usually when something warrants that title, that it is used. I would never refer to a boyfriend as a husband, or call someone Dr that is in premed.

But overall, be respectful of anyone who is respectful to you, no matter what the "title" may be.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

Funny, no offense,I love you gals. But its ironic. You spend lots of time feeding a monkey til the monkey became a gorilla. Im just praying you stopped that thread.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMillgrove

Before this thread disappears, which maybe it could considering how hot and heavy the personal insults are flying... .. and since the topic seems to be focussed less on the actual topic now, and on the Poster himself. I was wondering:

Did anyone go to his profile and read his long document in the journal? I did. I found it coherent, grammatically ok--and fascinating. The person who posts on the board doesn't seem to be the person who wrote that document. (I don't mean that literally...I am assuming he did write both on boards and that journal) It's just that one is so carefully considered and rather well-written, logically constructed. And the posts are so different from that style. You don't have to agree with the ideas in the journal document, to find it worth the time it takes to read. Surprisingly, I found myself agreeing with many of his ideas.

Just wondering if anyone else has read it? The very last paragraph is a "ball of string" analogy--wow I found it way cool.. and could relate to it myself.

Carry on, thank you. MsM goes back to her knitting...

quote:

ORIGINAL: sweetsub1957

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMillgrove

Before this thread disappears, which maybe it could considering how hot and heavy the personal insults are flying... .. and since the topic seems to be focussed less on the actual topic now, and on the Poster himself. I was wondering:

Did anyone go to his profile and read his long document in the journal? I did. I found it coherent, grammatically ok--and fascinating. The person who posts on the board doesn't seem to be the person who wrote that document. (I don't mean that literally...I am assuming he did write both on boards and that journal) It's just that one is so carefully considered and rather well-written, logically constructed. And the posts are so different from that style. You don't have to agree with the ideas in the journal document, to find it worth the time it takes to read. Surprisingly, I found myself agreeing with many of his ideas.

Just wondering if anyone else has read it? The very last paragraph is a "ball of string" analogy--wow I found it way cool.. and could relate to it myself.

Carry on, thank you. MsM goes back to her knitting...

Yes.  As a matter of fact, He sent me a personal invite to in my cmail.  I did read it.....and I found it very interesting.  I, also, found myself agreeing with a lot of what was said and being able to relate to a lot of it.  But it almost doesn't seem like the OP could have written it, especially when I compare it to His forum posts. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: sweetsub1957

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I'm sorry, OP, but I'm afraid I disagree with at least part of your post.

I'm not big on profile reading. I'm sure there are negative profiles out there just as there are positive ones. I know that quite a few females on the site, regardless of role, have changed their profile around since being here. (You'd be amazed at some of the crap that hits the good, ole inbox on the other side at times.)

I will tell you without hesitation that I don't receive any discourtesy or disrespect from the submissive females here. In those times that I am exchanging emails with them, more often than not, they will call Me Lady Pact or Ma'am. Some call Me by My real name and a few out there prefer My scene name. LP works just fine, too, for those who want to save the keystrokes. All in all, I have nothing but the highest praises for the manners of darn near every female submissive who has ever written Me on this site and it's rare that they do anything but brighten My day.

In fact, I'll thank you, OP, for an additional opportunity to say once again how much I enjoy the gals around here. As you get to know them better through these boards, I think you'll tend to agree with Me.

Thats caused you are lovable and sweet and knowlegable and smart and helpful and an all around nice person. We respect you because we got to know you here on the forums and not ONCE have you ever said,"on your knees bitch and call me Queen Mistress of all the World"

But at this point, with my admiration and respect for you, By golly[sm=pompom.gif], I would!!!!![sm=bowdown.gif]

I'll second that! 

quote:

I dont equate thoughts and opinions as any indication of authority.

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

authority in my opinion is status, says nothing about character

quote:

I agree Osf,  and mosts perception of character can be individually unique! That's what makes the world so exciting.

quote:

ORIGINAL: subangi

I cant recall who did that video awhile back about the guy talking on the phone envisioning this playboy type gorgeous sensual female, when in reality it was this overweight, older lady ironing while talking to this man who called one of those 1-800 sex numbers.  Priceless!

You can relate that to online also.....you never know who you may be corresponding to......a dominant, a wanker, a sexually deprived husband, or someone of the opposite sex. 

quote:

I cant recall who did that video awhile back about the guy talking on the phone envisioning this playboy type gorgeous sensual female, when in reality it was this overweight, older lady ironing while talking to this man who called one of those 1-800 sex numbers. Priceless!

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

quote:

I agree Osf,  and mosts perception of character can be individually unique! That's what makes the world so exciting.

you mean there may be someone for me?

quote:

ORIGINAL: rockspider