RE: Angry subs.

RE: Angry subs. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

osf -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 11:35:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OttersSwim quote: ORIGINAL: osf come on get real her post was a show of support of your post and an indirect attack on me Okay, so how about a direct attack on you? Thus far, what we know of you is that you have a keyboard and a goose. You make continuous circular arguments and statements about things that you clearly have very little actual real life experience or understanding of. You post leading statements and use your posts to antagonize other participants. You say you are trying to learn and understand but make it clear that you have no intention of learning or understanding - you are intentionally obtuse. You appear to be here for malice and amusement alone. Your exhibited behavior is well recognized as trolling. You are a troll. Congratulations on keeping so many people going for so long. I am sending a request to the moderators to please look at your posts and behavior and boot your ass out of here. there is so much bs there i don't know where to begin my sin is thinking outside the cm mainstream

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 11:37:35 AM)
quote: come on get real her post was a show of support of your post and an indirect attack on me Attack? You really think we care enough and have enough hostility to attack? Do our words hurt you tha much? Did we hurt your feelings?[:o] You think youre qualified to determine my intentions? You dont know me. but if you make no sense and are calling someone names or dishonest, but have no logical argument to back up your statements, I will call you on it even if I dont like the said poster you are being illogical with.

osf -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 11:40:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OttersSwim quote: ORIGINAL: osf come on get real her post was a show of support of your post and an indirect attack on me Okay, so how about a direct attack on you? Thus far, what we know of you is that you have a keyboard and a goose. You make continuous circular arguments and statements about things that you clearly have very little actual real life experience or understanding of. You post leading statements and use your posts to antagonize other participants. You say you are trying to learn and understand but make it clear that you have no intention of learning or understanding - you are intentionally obtuse. You appear to be here for malice and amusement alone. Your exhibited behavior is well recognized as trolling. You are a troll. Congratulations on keeping so many people going for so long. I am sending a request to the moderators to please look at your posts and behavior and boot your ass out of here. i also asked for a review

lizi -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 11:47:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: QuirkyAnne quote: ORIGINAL: lizi It's a bad strategy to use in finding your SO to announce what you are NOT looking for and what you DON'T want in strident agressive terms but people do that all the time and then wonder why they don't get anywhere. When you say "strident aggressive terms," do you mean the women who say things like, "Do not even think about contacting me if you are not [insert qualifications here]?" Anne Yes, that's a good example Anne of what I was talking about when I said strident and aggressive. Just to qualify, I'm talking about women and men. More examples: "NO SCAMMERS!!!!!!!", "NO MEN NO MEN NO MEN!!!", "I am not a bank ladies! Go find some other sucker to leech off of!", "Can't any of you morons read? I said I only want ...(fill in blank)", "NO FAKERS OR GAME PLAYERS!", "Be prepared to verify yourself on cam OR I WILL BLOCK YOU!!!" Any of those things could be said in a less aggressive way with less venom and it would still get the point across while making the profile seem more appealing to the person who was viewing it.

HarleyKitty69 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 11:59:17 AM)
OH BOY OH BOY did I find a angry hornest (spelling ? ) nest in this thread. and some good views too. I think I must go back and review my own profile now. I know that even I do not try to come across as negative I do more often then I am willing to admit. But I do know also it it because at times something gets lost in the translation between my mother language and english. Most of my friends know that and ask me if they need clarifaction, but strangers do get mad at me .......

mstrslve4fun -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 12:06:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: People who use the forums like you do are called trolls. and i'm trolling for? Attention, which you seem to be getting, in spades. A `troll' is an individual who enjoys creating conflict on the internet. He or she creates and fuels arguments which upset other members of the online community. Trolls thrive in the anonymous space that is the internet. Trolls crave attention from others, and they don't care whether the attention is positive or negative. For trolls, other users are not quite real people; they are abstract characters on the other side of a computer screen. Trolls don't feel bad about hurting the feelings of other people in the digital space. Trolls view chat rooms and newsgroups as a challenge where the winner is the user who creates the biggest argument, the user who upsets the most people in the most dramatic way. A troll wants to be the user getting the most attention. Troll behavior discourages many users and makes for a less vibrant online community. New users may not post because they fear ridicule. Established posters may leave an online community because the noise has overwhelmed the real discussion. Trolls can make an entire community paranoid, leading users to become negative or to accuse a user engaged in normal criticism as a troll. Remember, trolls feel rewarded by creating the biggest altercation possible. They want to get a reaction out of you. When you fight with a troll, he wins. When you reason with a troll, he wins. Any time that you give a troll attention, he gets exactly what he wants. The best way to deal with trolls is to ignore them. When you ignore a troll, he doesn't get the satisfaction of creating an escalated conflict. http://www.imdb.com/help/show_leaf?boardstrolls

happylittlepet -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 12:12:05 PM)
FR Two things come to my mind. 1. I never thought of the people who posted these 'warnings' etc. as angry. Maybe disappointed but mostly clearly expressing what they don't want/need. By clearly expressing that there are scammers, fakers, etc., they also send a warning to new members, who might not be aware (yet) about all this. 2. If, supposedly, someone is indeed very angry about a past 'connection' on CM that did not turn out to be what he/she wanted it to be, would it be better if that anger was dealt with first before jumping right back into exposure? If it is indeed anger, will that affect how a 'new connection' is approached, e.g. with mistrust?

happylittlepet -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 12:13:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mstrslve4fun New users may not post because they fear ridicule. I have that regardless of who is on the boards.

Daddy519 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 2:04:04 PM)
I haven't read all the posts here, so forgive me if someone's said this already... You expect someone to call you sir because you have the ability to type and click send? Respect is earned, and it takes more than identifying yourself as a dominant. If I'm disrespected in an email I click the delete button and move on.

wisdomtogive -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 2:13:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Daddy519 I haven't read all the posts here, so forgive me if someone's said this already... You expect someone to call you sir because you have the ability to type and click send? Respect is earned, and it takes more than identifying yourself as a dominant. If I'm disrespected in an email I click the delete button and move on. Excellent point Daddy519 and welcome to the boards You know i too have the ability to hit a key(s) on the keyboard and click send, and imagine this i am a submissive:). Respect is something no one here has the right to claim here. If you want to be treated in a respectful way then use your mind prior to starting an anti cm users thread. If in question if the anti user has ever been written about hit the search, it will take you a good year to read all of them. Perhaps I am really from a time of antiquity, but you know I was taught you don't enter a new place complaining about everything regarding that place. It is not a good idea.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 6:36:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wisdomtogive quote: ORIGINAL: Daddy519 I haven't read all the posts here, so forgive me if someone's said this already... You expect someone to call you sir because you have the ability to type and click send? Respect is earned, and it takes more than identifying yourself as a dominant. If I'm disrespected in an email I click the delete button and move on. Excellent point Daddy519 and welcome to the boards You know i too have the ability to hit a key(s) on the keyboard and click send, and imagine this i am a submissive:). Respect is something no one here has the right to claim here. If you want to be treated in a respectful way then use your mind prior to starting an anti cm users thread. If in question if the anti user has ever been written about hit the search, it will take you a good year to read all of them. Perhaps I am really from a time of antiquity, but you know I was taught you don't enter a new place complaining about everything regarding that place. It is not a good idea. Amen Sista!!!!

QuirkyAnne -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 8:32:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf and of course none of your posts fit that As a matter of fact, they don't. Anne

MsMillgrove -> RE: Angry subs. (12/30/2009 1:58:29 AM)
Before this thread disappears, which maybe it could considering how hot and heavy the personal insults are flying... .. and since the topic seems to be focussed less on the actual topic now, and on the Poster himself. I was wondering: Did anyone go to his profile and read his long document in the journal? I did. I found it coherent, grammatically ok--and fascinating. The person who posts on the board doesn't seem to be the person who wrote that document. (I don't mean that literally...I am assuming he did write both on boards and that journal) It's just that one is so carefully considered and rather well-written, logically constructed. And the posts are so different from that style. You don't have to agree with the ideas in the journal document, to find it worth the time it takes to read. Surprisingly, I found myself agreeing with many of his ideas. Just wondering if anyone else has read it? The very last paragraph is a "ball of string" analogy--wow I found it way cool.. and could relate to it myself. Carry on, thank you. MsM goes back to her knitting...

Elisabella -> RE: Angry subs. (12/30/2009 2:31:08 AM)
I just skimmed a bit of it, it's kinda TL;DR for me at least, but it does seem like the same person. The writing style is similar - very bang bang sentences, one subject and one predicate in many of them, direct and to the point. I've actually seen more than a few flashes of insight from osf, and more than that I think he's actually pretty intelligent. He's definitely a troll, no doubt, I'd be willing to bet actual money that he spelled "merit" wrong on purpose just to see how many people would jump in and say hurr durr u kant spell lulz ur dum. And that's trolling. The fact that at times I find it incredibly amusing is only incidental. Anyway I don't think he's going to be changing his posting style any time soon so everyone who gasps at how awful and shocking and whatnot he is would be better off using the ignore button rather than waiting for the mods. But that might entail too much personal responsibility.

tazzygirl -> RE: Angry subs. (12/30/2009 2:36:31 AM)
~FR if the money is upsetting the banana cart, why are you still feeding the monkey?

DrkJourney -> RE: Angry subs. (12/30/2009 3:30:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl ~FR if the money is upsetting the banana cart, why are you still feeding the monkey? funny, just what I was thinking. Can't believe someone has so little of a life that he has to go on just about every thread no matter what it's about, just to start trouble...the way he acts I was sure he was some teen on winter break, especially since he just seemed to come out of no where as of late, imagine my suprise when I saw how old he is, or how old his profile says he is. (no I didn't go look, it popped up on my homepage one day....made sure that will never happen again...lol) I've put him on block, which I've only done with one other person as long as I've been on CM so that says a lot. I wish others would do the same so we could discuss the actual thread and not give him any more attention I'm all for a good debate, but to enter a thread just to find someone to argue with...that's just sad

zephyroftheNorth -> RE: Angry subs. (12/30/2009 4:00:46 AM)
quote: You would have a negative profile too if every time you log on there is a message in your inbox that either ignored your profile or counts as harassment. If you want to scare away riff-raff, you make an angry profile. Not necessarily. I prefer block and delete. Creating an angry profile defeats the purpose if you (general) are looking for a Dom/Master as it puts you (general) in a bad light. Why come off as an angry, negative person when it's easy to just block and delete? zeph

Level -> RE: Angry subs. (12/30/2009 4:02:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff She will be Mine! I have a stick-to-itivness that can not be denied! Ward Don't they have a shot for that? [8\|]

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/30/2009 8:44:49 AM)
Funny, no offense,I love you gals. But its ironic. You spend lots of time feeding a monkey til the monkey became a gorilla. Im just praying you stopped that thread.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/30/2009 8:47:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MsMillgrove Before this thread disappears, which maybe it could considering how hot and heavy the personal insults are flying... .. and since the topic seems to be focussed less on the actual topic now, and on the Poster himself. I was wondering: Did anyone go to his profile and read his long document in the journal? I did. I found it coherent, grammatically ok--and fascinating. The person who posts on the board doesn't seem to be the person who wrote that document. (I don't mean that literally...I am assuming he did write both on boards and that journal) It's just that one is so carefully considered and rather well-written, logically constructed. And the posts are so different from that style. You don't have to agree with the ideas in the journal document, to find it worth the time it takes to read. Surprisingly, I found myself agreeing with many of his ideas. Just wondering if anyone else has read it? The very last paragraph is a "ball of string" analogy--wow I found it way cool.. and could relate to it myself. Carry on, thank you. MsM goes back to her knitting... I did. I thought it was probably a cut and paste of anothers writing from the web.

Page: << < prev 7 8 [9] 10 11 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875