RE: Angry subs.

RE: Angry subs. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

osf -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 8:18:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Justme696 quote: ORIGINAL: osf i used to work in manufacturing to extremely close tolorences and learned early on nothing is exact there is always a deviation i like the word deviation well aslong the deviations ( UCL and LCL) are between the tolerances ( USL/LSL) then we are happy. does that mean we have to color within the lines? how boring

Justme696 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 8:19:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: ORIGINAL: Justme696 quote: ORIGINAL: osf i used to work in manufacturing to extremely close tolorences and learned early on nothing is exact there is always a deviation i like the word deviation well aslong the deviations ( UCL and LCL) are between the tolerances ( USL/LSL) then we are happy. does that mean we have to color within the lines? how boring the boring thing is..you ask for answers and don't like them when people have a different opinion.

sblady -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 8:29:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Justme696 quote: ORIGINAL: osf \does that mean we have to color within the lines? how boring the boring thing is..you ask for answers and don't like them when people have a different opinion. Another reason I kneel to you across the pond. [sm=bowdown.gif] With Sir's permission of course. [:D]

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 9:04:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Justme696 quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: ORIGINAL: Justme696 quote: ORIGINAL: osf i used to work in manufacturing to extremely close tolorences and learned early on nothing is exact there is always a deviation i like the word deviation well aslong the deviations ( UCL and LCL) are between the tolerances ( USL/LSL) then we are happy. does that mean we have to color within the lines? how boring the boring thing is..you ask for answers and don't like them when people have a different opinion. You are just speaking too cerebral for me this morning dahling Sir. i dont get that mechanical physicsy stuff. So can ya just talk about clothes and shoes til I get my coffee?

subangi -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 9:59:09 AM)
I cant recall who did that video awhile back about the guy talking on the phone envisioning this playboy type gorgeous sensual female, when in reality it was this overweight, older lady ironing while talking to this man who called one of those 1-800 sex numbers. Priceless! You can relate that to online also.....you never know who you may be corresponding to......a dominant, a wanker, a sexually deprived husband, or someone of the opposite sex. But to reply specifically to the OPs observation.....its just like in vanilla life...people view their experiences as the cup half full, while others choose half empty....you make the decision whos cup you are interested in. and in giving reverence to someone by addressing them with a title? For those who need titles, it is usually when something warrants that title, that it is used. I would never refer to a boyfriend as a husband, or call someone Dr that is in premed. But overall, be respectful of anyone who is respectful to you, no matter what the "title" may be.

QuirkyAnne -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:12:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf what does total mean, thats the question everyone has limits, and limits =/= total Actually it's not the question. The question in this particular topic was about "angry subs" and the OP's curiosity about them. If you're now curious about what TOTAL means, Mr. Clinton, why don't you go discuss it by starting another one of your rambling threads so you can pretend to be some wise old man who waxes philosophical about bashing/barbecuing/abusing women and what that means in the world. You may now take this opportunity by responding with one of your oh-so-enjoyable, deliberately vague, 1-3 line, poorly spelled and punctuated responses that you clearly think makes you look mysterious. Anne

sexyred1 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:21:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: QuirkyAnne quote: ORIGINAL: osf what does total mean, thats the question everyone has limits, and limits =/= total Actually it's not the question. The question in this particular topic was about "angry subs" and the OP's curiosity about them. If you're now curious about what TOTAL means, Mr. Clinton, why don't you go discuss it by starting another one of your rambling threads so you can pretend to be some wise old man who waxes philosophical about bashing/barbecuing/abusing women and what that means in the world. You may now take this opportunity by responding with one of your oh-so-enjoyable, deliberately vague, 1-3 line, poorly spelled and punctuated responses that you clearly think makes you look mysterious. Anne [sm=agree.gif]

osf -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:29:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Justme696 quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: ORIGINAL: Justme696 quote: ORIGINAL: osf i used to work in manufacturing to extremely close tolorences and learned early on nothing is exact there is always a deviation i like the word deviation well aslong the deviations ( UCL and LCL) are between the tolerances ( USL/LSL) then we are happy. does that mean we have to color within the lines? how boring the boring thing is..you ask for answers and don't like them when people have a different opinion. it's not the answer, it's the attitude

osf -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:31:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 quote: ORIGINAL: Justme696 quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: ORIGINAL: Justme696 quote: ORIGINAL: osf i used to work in manufacturing to extremely close tolorences and learned early on nothing is exact there is always a deviation i like the word deviation well aslong the deviations ( UCL and LCL) are between the tolerances ( USL/LSL) then we are happy. does that mean we have to color within the lines? how boring the boring thing is..you ask for answers and don't like them when people have a different opinion. You are just speaking too cerebral for me this morning dahling Sir. i dont get that mechanical physicsy stuff. So can ya just talk about clothes and shoes til I get my coffee? it's like you order a pair of heels and the come 2 different hights

domiguy -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:32:57 AM)
The whole concept of profiles is fine to find out where someone lives or get a slight feel for some likes or dislikes. These forums are the cat's meow for really getting a feel for an individual. I have contacted a few subbies vis their profile but much of what transpires out here has been in direct response to participation in these here forums. This is what every good subbie should know, you come out here be smart, cool as the other side of the pillow and swing a big twat you shall be knee deep in floggers and cock in no time flat. it's nice to get "cold calls" on your porfile but it's also nice to get contacted by htose you have developed "a feel for" off of these forums....I get contacted quite a bit....lately LadyAngelika has been pounding down my forum door...I think she wants to do me. who knew? Enjoy the forums. Tis' the path to cock and pussy galore.

osf -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:35:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: QuirkyAnne quote: ORIGINAL: osf what does total mean, thats the question everyone has limits, and limits =/= total Actually it's not the question. The question in this particular topic was about "angry subs" and the OP's curiosity about them. If you're now curious about what TOTAL means, Mr. Clinton, why don't you go discuss it by starting another one of your rambling threads so you can pretend to be some wise old man who waxes philosophical about bashing/barbecuing/abusing women and what that means in the world. You may now take this opportunity by responding with one of your oh-so-enjoyable, deliberately vague, 1-3 line, poorly spelled and punctuated responses that you clearly think makes you look mysterious. Anne online despite the Merritt of the argument, the better typist usually wins

osf -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:37:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sexyred1 quote: ORIGINAL: QuirkyAnne quote: ORIGINAL: osf what does total mean, thats the question everyone has limits, and limits =/= total Actually it's not the question. The question in this particular topic was about "angry subs" and the OP's curiosity about them. If you're now curious about what TOTAL means, Mr. Clinton, why don't you go discuss it by starting another one of your rambling threads so you can pretend to be some wise old man who waxes philosophical about bashing/barbecuing/abusing women and what that means in the world. You may now take this opportunity by responding with one of your oh-so-enjoyable, deliberately vague, 1-3 line, poorly spelled and punctuated responses that you clearly think makes you look mysterious. Anne [sm=agree.gif] go back and take the post in context of the preceding posts i can tolerate your views but i have a problem with your dishonesty

LaTigresse -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:38:25 AM)
Or the one that can spell the word they are attempting to use to describe their own abilities perhaps...? merit

sexyred1 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:39:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: ORIGINAL: sexyred1 quote: ORIGINAL: QuirkyAnne quote: ORIGINAL: osf what does total mean, thats the question everyone has limits, and limits =/= total Actually it's not the question. The question in this particular topic was about "angry subs" and the OP's curiosity about them. If you're now curious about what TOTAL means, Mr. Clinton, why don't you go discuss it by starting another one of your rambling threads so you can pretend to be some wise old man who waxes philosophical about bashing/barbecuing/abusing women and what that means in the world. You may now take this opportunity by responding with one of your oh-so-enjoyable, deliberately vague, 1-3 line, poorly spelled and punctuated responses that you clearly think makes you look mysterious. Anne [sm=agree.gif] go back and take the post in context of the preceding posts i can tolerate your views but i have a problem with your dishonesty Pardon my language, but what the fuck are you talking about? Dishonesty about what? I have been perfectly honest each time I reply to one of your silly posts. What would be dishonest is if I agreed with anything you said. Try to focus. I was agreeing with QuirkyAnne, not you. [:'(]

osf -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:43:27 AM)
quote: Pardon my language, but what the fuck are you talking about? Dishonesty about what? I have been perfectly honest each time I reply to one of your silly posts. What would be dishonest is if I agreed with anything you said. when you display them alone as though they were said in a vacuum and give your answer, i'm sorry but that is dishonest

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:48:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: Pardon my language, but what the fuck are you talking about? Dishonesty about what? I have been perfectly honest each time I reply to one of your silly posts. What would be dishonest is if I agreed with anything you said. when you display them alone as though they were said in a vacuum and give your answer, i'm sorry but that is dishonest Sometimes you make no sense at all. You are rather circular. Red does not talk as though she was in a vacuum. She makes statements in real time with real experience and drawing upon that and what she has observed. What you dont seem to get is the possibility that if things are said to you by subs and experienced doms alike and you dont like the response you come up with a miriad of ways to discount them. The only common denominator in these disagreements is you and your denials of anyone else having validity.

QuirkyAnne -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:49:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf online despite the Merritt of the argument, the better typist usually wins If that's the case, then you'll "lose" ever time you debate an argument. And it's spelled MERIT. Anne

osf -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:54:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: QuirkyAnne quote: ORIGINAL: osf online despite the Merritt of the argument, the better typist usually wins If that's the case, then you'll "lose" ever time you debate an argument. And it's spelled MERIT. Anne ty

lizi -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:54:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf online despite the Merritt of the argument, the better typist usually wins Sorry, topic hijack: Osf, you've used the 'typing' argument before. As if being a poor typist also means that poor spelling, poor grammar, and poor writing/reasoning skills must come along with the lack of proficiency at typing words on a keyboard. One does not necessarily mean the other. Being a poor typist does not mean you cannot use spellcheck or be more clear in what you post here. It's an excuse and it's coming across like one. And honestly with as much posting as you do on here I'd think the repeated use of your typing skills such as they are would have resulted in some improvement by now. I may say I am a poor housekeeper because I do not know how to do dishes or because I do them slowly. In reality I'm a poor housekeeper because I don't want to do the dishes and I'm using the lack of knowledge or skill as an excuse. I guess I have only myself to blame if no one wants to come over to my house and spend time with me because it's a mess.

Justme696 -> RE: Angry subs. (12/29/2009 10:59:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf it's not the answer, it's the attitude I hope you learn from your own words. To be able to teach, you have to learn first.

Page: << < prev 5 6 [7] 8 9 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875