RE: Misogyny and BDSM (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Aynne88 -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 4:19:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri

Ahhh, Aynne!!

That made me laugh SO hard!

Way back, years ago, there was a wildly hilarious site on yahoo that had some pretty damned funny satires of various actual Goreans & Gorean wannabes. It used to just crack me the hell up. Blackberry's something Castle. He had one MasterMullet...good shit!

I'm gonna have to go check wayback.com to see if I can still find it.

Thanks for the laugh, I needed that!

~K



Good morning Kimveri, thanks for getting that, it really was meant to be funny. Ths site is mulletjunky.com and it's hilarious.

I personally have a lot of respect for Orion even if I don't agree with the Gorean philosophy, but who really cares? I also always enjoy your posts as well as Tim's, Ishy, AllyC, just to name a few off the top of my head.

I know that feminists and Goreans are probably not going to walk off into the sunset anytime soon, but I appreciate that you seem to retain your own identity and sense of humor while remaining true to your values, if that made any sense, it's early and I am only on coffee one. Enjoy your day, it's 5 below here, jaysus brrrr. [8D].




Elisabella -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 4:27:36 AM)

I'm not sure what I said about the law, and you did refer to yourself as a 'good little whore' at the top of page 10 so I'm not projecting anyone's words but your own.

But I really love how you think men and women should be treated and paid equally in the same job when you just said yourself that being an attractive woman gives you a strong competitive edge over an 'average guy' - but I bet you'd freak if someone said "clients would rather buy from a 'good old boy' than a woman" and gave a man the position based on the fact that clients liked working with a man.

You should be paid more, in your job, because you're better at it than the 'average guy' and by the same token the 'average guy' whose averageness and maleness works to set clients at ease should be paid more than a woman.

Shocking, innit?




Lucienne -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 4:37:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri

I continued, tallying up ALL the "Gorean men" I could find there....all the way to the last page & last post.

ONE fucking man. ONE!!

...& most of ya'll know damn well that OrionTheWolf is not a scary, out-of-control asswipe.

FFS.....can we at least be accurate in our hatred? [sm=whoa.gif]

How else can all these hatreds be extinguished if so many of their sources are imaginary? ;-D

~K


In fairness to kittenSol, Orion is a pretty mouthy dude. It's not that surprising that her memory would amplify him into more than one poster.

Any ol hoo ha, I frequently see posters here stating that hatred of Goreans is misplaced, or uninformed. And a lot of it probably is. But the thing about the Gorean lifestyle, in my opinion, is that it's the kind of thing that's easier to respect as long as one's knowledge of it is vague. I don't hate Goreans. Hate is such a strong word. But I do find the "lifestyle" unappealing. And the more I learn about it, the more objectionable I find it to be.

I don't think I'd even heard of John Norman and his books prior to joining this forum. A quick perusal of that subforum was enough to know that it's not for me. Sometimes I'll read threads there out of anthropological curiousity. I put my finger on my fundamental disagreement with Gorean ideas when Animus Rex (pretty sure it was him) wrote something along the lines of - the world of Gor assumes that the Enlightenment never happened. I'm a fan of the enlightenmnet. Hence, not a fan of Gor. Also, I am strongly opposed to notions of people as chattel. So... a "communal M/s dynamic" is obviously not going to sit well with me. To say that Goreans distinguish themselves in the misogyny department is not only untrue in my observation, it's almost too narrow of a point.

I respect a person's right to choose a Gorean lifestyle. But the more I learn about it, the more fundamentally loathsome  I find it to be. I don't consider it a pernicious force in society (say, for example, like biblical capitalism), or its practitioners inherently dangerous or bad people. I don't find it worthy of hatred. To the extent that I consider it harmful, well, its harm is self-contained and the injured self-selecting and consenting. This is where I've ended up from learning more about Goreans. I wonder if that level of acceptance is enough for Goreans who expect rational tolerance?




Aynne88 -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 5:04:08 AM)

Elisabella really, this is a BDSM site, do a word search for whore, prepare for a gazillion replies.

Those average joe's I am talking about are other lobster buyers, so yes, I take whatever measures I have to to win over the suppliers from the other buyer's. I take it you haven't been in sales? Look, those guys run buying stations with bikini clad girls and women in daisy dukes handing out ice cold beers when the men come in with the catch, so they are playing the same game. We don't do that, I prefer to actually pay them more and pay them daily, and actually spend some time hanging out with them building a repoire and if part of it is being "one of the guys" while engaging in some harmless banter, flirting, whatever, then I will.

I don't get "paid more" I told you it's a commissioned position, so if  I don't close the deals, I don't get paid.  My pay solely depends on my skill. When I am trying to sell thousands of pounds of Maine lostermeat to processors in Canada, which is where the real money is, they don't have one clue what I look like or how flirt, that's a lot of money, the only care about what I can promise and can I deliver the goods, so if I can beat the other sales reps that work for my Man, then tough. That's what sales is, delivering the goods better than the next guy. Closing the deal.  It's fucking hard work. Glengarry Glen Ross, best movie ever on the ruthlessness of sales. It ain't Mary Kay we're talking about. Add to that this is Maine and it's very much a male dominated business, well....I earn my money.






Kimveri -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 5:13:09 AM)

Morning, Lucienne,

As I've said to others...if you don't take the time to discover for yourself what the deal is, then you are to blame for both your ignorance AND your gullibility when it comes to wrong information.

Animus is not even a Gorean, let alone the author of the whole series, but go ahead, get medical information from the busdriver who drives past the hospital every day......

o_O

I realize that the seeking of one's truest self can be a really ugly journey. I also recognize that it's hard to swallow one's fears & instead celebrate the differences. I know that admitting one's own mistakes is painful & acting to correct them arduous. I am aware that it goes against societal teachings to say that those who cannot/willnot defend their freedom should not have it. I see that excellence makes people nervous...but...

I think human beings should do all of those things anyways, no matter how difficult they are.

I still refuse to accept any excuses from people. YOU are responsible for your life, your feelings & your knowledge as well as the lack thereof. I don't buy into victim mentalities, nor do I put down anyone for protecting &/or defending themself. There's no shame in being selfish as long it's holding the hands of pragmatism & honesty.

The largest goal is truth........the toughest truth to find is personal.

Do it....or don't....but you'll get nothing but contempt from me if you rely on others instead of coming here with the actual "blood" of your own kill to discuss.

I think it's pretty simple: Lead, follow or kneel. NONE of the three needs to apologize.

But then...I actually LIKE human beings...

*shrug*

Have a grand day & a happy new year!

~Kimveri




Lucienne -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 5:18:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
The culture that most men assimilate is the androculture. The culture that most women assimilate is the gynoculture. The two are not interchangeable, though they are sufficiently compatible to allow most interactions to be passable, kind of like how someone from a hood area in the US might interact with the nobility in the UK and not necessarily bungle everything. There will be friction, though, unless someone reaches out to teach the differences.


Well, that's just a load of hogwash. A google search didn't show much use of the terms. Are there any remotely academic papers that approach gender socialization as different "cultures"? I ask because it's easy enough for us to throw around terms like "culture," but people who make a systematic study of these things tend to be more precise and attendant to meaning. I think that approaching gender socialization as different cultures, particularly the extreme example you gave, is not only incorrect, but harmfully divisive.

quote:

A woman who has assimilated androculture, like my dear, exhibits many of the same behaviors as men, espouses a lot of the same values, has just as much trouble as a man in relating to women, and is likely to be confused with a man in a forum that doesn't list gender, or to be considered "one of the guys" at a predominantly male social event. The ways a woman would normally build social bonds are lost on a woman that has assimilated androculture. And vice versa.


Interesting, but still more hogwash. As for internet forums, at least on forums heavily populated with americans, the default assumption is that a poster is a straight white male unless otherwise indicated. (I believe there actually has been studies of that, but I can't find one at the moment.)

Want to be confused with a man on the internet? Choose a gender neutral handle, don't attach a photo, and don't post things like "As a woman, I think..." It's actually pretty funny. With a gender neutral handle, I can go on about the joys of sucking cock and the dudes reading it will assume I'm a gay man before they get around to wondering if I'm a chick. My handle here is actually a female name and I've been repeatedly mistaken for a man on this forum. Just yesterday, as a matter of fact. I suggested that the reason for the mistake is the movie Underworld. The person responded, maybe that's it, but also that I don't post like a whiney bitch. Do I really post "like a man," or is there something else going on here?

As for real life interaction... I've got the honorary man card. I have many male friends. I am "just one of the guys (that many of them hit on at one point but realized it was fruitless)" at predominately male social events. Hell, I'm frequently "just one of the guys" at mixed gender events.

The ways that women build social bonds are not lost on me. I have close female friends. I suppose this means, by your thinking, that I've not fully assimilated "androculture." I think it means that I was raised as a feminist, encouraged to be comfortable with who I am, relate to people as people, and not get overly caught up in gender expectations.

quote:

Realizing that one is dealing with two seperate, valid cultures with superficial similarities is an important step in having better relations with each other.


I see that you have good intentions. But I disagree.

quote:

Imagine if you were to try to befriend someone from an oriental country, or the middle east, and insisted on interacting on your own culture's terms at all times. That certainly wouldn't give optimal results. If, on the other hand, both take the time to understand the differences, good results will be had.


Asian. Not "oriental." Using "oriental" makes you sound either really old or mildly uneducated. I have made friends with people from different cultures. It's really not even close to the experience of interacting with men of my own culture.





Kimveri -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 5:19:40 AM)

Morning, pretty Aynne,

Of course I saw the humor!! OMG....I lived with a "MulletMaster" for a while.....ummm.......well....let's just leave it at the fact that this was deliciously funny!

Thanks for the nod & the good company. I know that you (& others here) are too smart for the over-generalizations against any single group, like Goreans. I tend to expect more of the smart, perceptive people....I'm odd like that.... o,O

I just want people to look past the caped 3rd graders swearing they're "Goreans" to maybe discern, for themselves, what some of the Gorean values & ideals are.

I promise, that won't make the silly mullet'ed & caped 3rd graders any less ridiculous!!

hehe

Take care,

~Kimveri




Aswad -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 5:49:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

It's not that surprising that her memory would amplify him into more than one poster.


That's possibly one of the more interesting compliments I've seen on these boards, though probably unintentional.

quote:

And the more I learn about it, the more objectionable I find it to be.


Finding us objectionable is fine. We don't mind that. However...

"If we are to be damned, let us be damned for who we really are." - Picard, ST:tNG.

quote:

To say that Goreans distinguish themselves in the misogyny department is not only untrue in my observation, it's almost too narrow of a point.


Which was the original point of contention, as kittin and others forwarded that it's an inherent feature of the Gorean lifestyles. Incidentally, AnimusRex's point misses key elements, such as the similarities to Objectivism, which is more descriptive than his. You might even go so far as to say that it is Objectivism that proceeds from naturalism instead of humanism, if simplifying things as far as AR's line did (as quoted).

quote:

I wonder if that level of acceptance is enough for Goreans who expect rational tolerance?


The more important matter is the truth.

Being tolerated for a lie is no better than being vilified for one.

Health,
al-Aswad.





barelynangel -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 5:57:48 AM)

I am curious -- how many of you who don't LIKE Goreans or Gorean living etc believe you would be able to identify a Gorean offline by simple interaction with them on a basic level of acquaintances or even friendship if they don't tell you they are in fact Gorean and you don't have any interactions with their slaves? I doubt you could identify Gorean even with basic interaction with the slaves.

I really doubt any of you really know what it is to interact with Goreans outside a writing online forum wherein the focus is them discussing their breaking down beliefs as they do in the Gorean forum. I really don't believe most people know what it is to take what is discussed and know what it is to see the WHOLE of the being Gorean as well simply life of the individuals.

I have said many times that if i didn't know what Gorean Men were and how they actually LIVE, i would have run far and fast from what i see portrayed as Gorean by many even in the discussions of what being Gorean is when i found online and started seeing people discuss it.

Its easy to form a negative opinion based on a BIT of information when its taken apart and analyzed, however, when you put it in as the WHOLE concept -- it takes on a different flavor. Sorta like in a pie where the zest of a lemon or such is used. Analyzed alone, tasted and such its welll ewww and yet it has principles to it that benefits the pie in general. However, put it in a pie and mix it in with a whole bunch of other things and then taste it as a whole concept of the pie -- it mixes in well to where it blends into a complete concept and supports the overall intention of the pie so to speak.

However, yes, many will take online discussions and focus on that one subject mentality or even a couple of them and forget that its a whole concept when applied to LIFE as a whole. Most people would never be able to identify Goreans by simple interaction with them on a life scale versus an online writing venue.

Also, you can take bits and pieces of a book out of the whole to discuss it and find based on te discussion you don't like the WHOLE book?

You have to remember in discussing our beliefs, lives, and moralities in the forum of Gorean living, we are in fact breaking the system of our lives into pieces and analyzing same, but when its LIVED its lived as a whole concept that blends together. Much like, i believe most people do when they come to forums such as this. You break down the whole of who you are to discuss aspects not the full blended concept in detail.

It honestly boggles my mind how people can bitch that they don't like Gor and then say Goreans somehow have to accept that and ALSO they MUST accept others views negatively of Gor -- but Goreans can't tell others they don't like THEIR ways or beliefs because if they do its Goreans being unaccepting? Isn't that hypocritical. Why should GOREANS have to accept all, and yet those who dislike Goreans bitch how Goreans don't like what THEY choose to do. Its irony at its best.

To me, if you can say well i don't like Goreans or Gor -- then you shold be able to accept when Goreans say well we don't like what you do and believe either. Yet that never seems to be the understanding, is it?


angel





Lucienne -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 5:59:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri

Morning, Lucienne,

As I've said to others...if you don't take the time to discover for yourself what the deal is, then you are to blame for both your ignorance AND your gullibility when it comes to wrong information.


I get the impression that a person is not considered sufficiently well-versed in the Gorean lifestyle to pass judgment until that judgment is "the Gorean lifestyle is TEH AWESOME!" You know, sometimes people just disagree. They want different things. I don't need to became an expert on Gor to realize it's not something that works for me. This attitude of "tear off the blinds of ignorance and see the way to a better life!"... well, it's a bit too evangelical for my tastes. And it makes it mildly tempting to dust off my Jesuit tools and filet the whole thing.

quote:

Animus is not even a Gorean, let alone the author of the whole series, but go ahead, get medical information from the busdriver who drives past the hospital every day......


From my observation, Animus is an intelligent poster who has taken the time to learn more about Goreans than I care to. His statement was consistent with what I've read Goreans writing about their deal, and (from my memory) it stood uncontensted in a long thread where people were actively correcting what they considered misimpressions. Instead of challenging his credentials to speak, could you perhaps explain why the statement is incorrect? (Keeping in mind that I'm working from memory here and what is important is the statement about the Enlightenment, not who wrote it). Or is ad hominem argument a founding principle of Gor?

quote:

I realize that the seeking of one's truest self can be a really ugly journey. I also recognize that it's hard to swallow one's fears & instead celebrate the differences. I know that admitting one's own mistakes is painful & acting to correct them arduous. I am aware that it goes against societal teachings to say that those who cannot/willnot defend their freedom should not have it. I see that excellence makes people nervous...but...

I think human beings should do all of those things anyways, no matter how difficult they are.


There it is again, the religious undertones. Terrible shame John Norman couldn't get in touch with his inner L. Ron Hubbard and formalize this for you. First... there was the WORD.

quote:

I still refuse to accept any excuses from people. YOU are responsible for your life, your feelings & your knowledge as well as the lack thereof. I don't buy into victim mentalities, nor do I put down anyone for protecting &/or defending themself. There's no shame in being selfish as long it's holding the hands of pragmatism & honesty.

The largest goal is truth........the toughest truth to find is personal.


I don't know where talk of excuses and victim mentalities came from. I am responsible for my knowledge and lack thereof. I have enough information to know that the Gorean lifestyle neither appeals to or threatens me. That's pretty much all I need from that corner of the world. The rest is satisfying idle curiosity.

quote:

Do it....or don't....but you'll get nothing but contempt from me if you rely on others instead of coming here with the actual "blood" of your own kill to discuss.


I'll set aside my excitement caused by talk of blood and kills for a moment to point out how silly this is. You've got your one true path and you won't respect those who don't walk it? Ok. I mean... that's your right. Or was the contemptuous error relying on a non-Gorean for an accurate description rather than a Gorean, or THE MAN HIMSELF? You have your own board for people who are actively living the Gorean lifestyle. Feel free to spread your contempt for idle observers, but it just looks silly on a general discussion board.

quote:

I think it's pretty simple: Lead, follow or kneel. NONE of the three needs to apologize.


Now, back to my excitement regarding blood and kills. Not choosing a Gorean lifestyle doesn't mean that I disagree with absolutely every tenet or value espoused. And I think Goreans tend to come across as vainglorious when they assume as much. For the record, if you and yours come for my freedom, I'll "slaughter" you all with a clean conscience.

quote:

But then...I actually LIKE human beings...

*shrug*

More weird built-in assumptions that make little sense to people who don't consider an encyclopedic knowledge of the Gorean WAY a valuable tool or interesting diversion. I proudly own my ignorance of your odd and harmless little subculture.

quote:

Have a grand day & a happy new year!

~Kimveri


To you as well. Just, you know, don't fuck with my shit and we'll get along fine. :)





Aswad -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 6:03:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

I don't get "paid more" I told you it's a commissioned position, so if  I don't close the deals, I don't get paid. My pay solely depends on my skill.


Sounds like an equal opportunity to me, unless your comission for an identical sale is less than what someone else would get for the same sale. And, incidentally, it's no wonder it's a male dominated profession, since competition and a direct relation between performance and payback is how things work- both of those generally appeal to men (and not so much to most women, in my experience, with some definite exceptions).

Up here, the wage disparity runs the other way, once you figure in work hours, sick leave, choice of profession, and so forth. In short, once you renormalize to a question of payback for equal work, women earn about 25% more than men up here. But the movement that inherited from feminism (translated, the "women's affairs" front, as virtually nobody will actually use the word "feminism" here anymore) passes that off as there being a 15% disparity in the opposite direction, on account of disregarding the question of equal work by simplifying to wages earned divided by labor force size.

If you've picked a line of work which pays you to make money, one might assume you would be inclined to agree that equal wages should be a function of equal work, rather than a notion that women should earn the same as men that will pick more lucrative professions and put in more hours at those professions, yes?

Health,
al-Aswad.





RedMagic1 -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 6:06:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
Want to be confused with a man on the internet? Choose a gender neutral handle, don't attach a photo, and don't post things like "As a woman, I think..." It's actually pretty funny. With a gender neutral handle, I can go on about the joys of sucking cock and the dudes reading it will assume I'm a gay man before they get around to wondering if I'm a chick. My handle here is actually a female name and I've been repeatedly mistaken for a man on this forum. Just yesterday, as a matter of fact. I suggested that the reason for the mistake is the movie Underworld. The person responded, maybe that's it, but also that I don't post like a whiney bitch. Do I really post "like a man," or is there something else going on here?

I don't assume anyone is female, even if they say they are.  Not on this site.  Have you ever encountered, say, a sub woman using a dom man's profile?  Or a gay woman using a het man's profile?  Even once?  And yet there are quite a few sub men working femdom profiles, and straight men working bi and lez profiles.  This carries over into the message boards, though not as much.

Men and women write profiles differently, post differently, and respond to online criticism differently.  I look for those cues.  As an example, women are far more willing to block someone than men are.  A lot of men, especially doms, refuse to block.  Dominant women tend to have no problem racking up a huge block list.  It's a gender thing, not an orientation thing.




Justme696 -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 6:06:38 AM)

quote:

I am curious -- how many of you who don't LIKE Goreans or Gorean living etc believe you would be able to identify a Gorean offline by simple interaction with them on a basic level of acquaintances or even friendship if they don't tell you they are in fact Gorean and you don't have any interactions with their slaves?


good question. Propably not.
Although not every one is the same..some try to be uber Gorean ( so do some Bdsm-ers)...I wonder why they would behave different online then offline.
People should be who they are. And people should allow them to be who they are, when they don't do harm.

btw I don't dislike Goreans




Lucienne -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 6:15:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
To say that Goreans distinguish themselves in the misogyny department is not only untrue in my observation, it's almost too narrow of a point.


Which was the original point of contention, as kittin and others forwarded that it's an inherent feature of the Gorean lifestyles. Incidentally, AnimusRex's point misses key elements, such as the similarities to Objectivism, which is more descriptive than his. You might even go so far as to say that it is Objectivism that proceeds from naturalism instead of humanism, if simplifying things as far as AR's line did (as quoted).


Well, if it's Objectivism that proceeds from naturalism rather than humanism then I find myself in the (enviable?) position of being more of an authority on the subject than I realized. I had noticed similarities, but didn't want to point them out myself because... Objectivism is profoundly foolish and it seemed unfair to saddle the lifestyle with more tendentious fiction.


quote:

ORIGINAL: barelynangel

I am curious -- how many of you who don't LIKE Goreans or Gorean living etc believe you would be able to identify a Gorean offline by simple interaction with them on a basic level of acquaintances or even friendship if they don't tell you they are in fact Gorean and you don't have any interactions with their slaves?


I've thought about this. I don't think of myself as disliking Goreans as people. And I'm pretty sure that I wouldn't be able to spot a Gorean under the circumstances you outlined. Certain beliefs sure, but ID them as Gorean without them self-identifying in some way? I seriously doubt it.

It's one of the reasons I consider the lifestyle harmless at a practical level.




Lucienne -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 6:20:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1
A lot of men, especially doms, refuse to block. 



I confess, my inner sadist has taken advantage of this fact.




RedMagic1 -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 6:32:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1
A lot of men, especially doms, refuse to block. 

I confess, my inner sadist has taken advantage of this fact.

Ooooh baby!

Dang it, do you remember I sent a "Hi how are you?" email a while back because I liked your posts, and you never responded?  (I feel so misandricized.[:(])  Well, feel free to cybertorture me with a scaaaaathing response anytime you wish.  It's been fun watching you smack Aswad around.  (I actually only read your responses, not his posts.  You're on my personal "read" list, but he isn't any more I'm afraid.  One screenful of text too many sent me over the edge.)

I promise not to block you.




DarlingSavage -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 7:01:10 AM)

quote:

women dont drop them little ten pounders outta the cave without a man shoots some jizz in there somehow, this is such a chicken and egg argument. (and not just this particular one.)

Lets celebrate each other, Misogyny is not rampant in BDSM, somebody gotta beat somebody and it aint all men in the study and women in the bathroom and Col. Mustard in the study.

Captain Conundrum


Actually, I wasn't saying that misogyny was rampant in BDSM, I was just commenting on her apology. Also, I hate to break it to you, but male sperm may not be all that necessary for procreation. Here is an entire species that is made up of one gender, female:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,921830,00.html

I don't know how to make links in here yet, but I hope that works.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 7:36:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

FR to nobody in particular-

You know, the nice thing about feminism, is that the word means pretty much anything one wishes it to mean.
For instance, it is wielded by Sarah Palin, Jenna Jameson, Kate Millet, and Phyllis Schlafly with equal ardor and stridency. Each of them has a different meaning, and definition of it.

The only possible common denominator is that women have wonderful unique qualities, and are deserving of respect.

I say all this, only to show that ginning up a big "I hate teh feminazis" rant is as foolish as it is impotent. Yes, some feminist scholars are cranky men haters. Just imagine them locked in a room with Rush Limbaugh, and go about your day.

I have written a few posts discussing my quarrels with classic First Wave feminism, but it hardly makes a ripple. Locking yourself in a battle with a phantom army of bra burning women's libbers just makes one sound angry and fearful. Pointing out a specific target is a bit more productive.


Eloquently stated and right on the money. Bravo AnimusRex!

Edited - Brava to Bravo, apparently my clever play on words, Brava to state a friend to womankind, was misconstrued.

- LA




osf -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 7:42:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

I'm not sure what I said about the law, and you did refer to yourself as a 'good little whore' at the top of page 10 so I'm not projecting anyone's words but your own.

But I really love how you think men and women should be treated and paid equally in the same job when you just said yourself that being an attractive woman gives you a strong competitive edge over an 'average guy' - but I bet you'd freak if someone said "clients would rather buy from a 'good old boy' than a woman" and gave a man the position based on the fact that clients liked working with a man.

You should be paid more, in your job, because you're better at it than the 'average guy' and by the same token the 'average guy' whose averageness and maleness works to set clients at ease should be paid more than a woman.

Shocking, innit?


hear hear




LadyPact -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (12/30/2009 7:44:12 AM)

Wow.  Just wow.  I'm thinking I need more caffeine, a French to English translator, and maybe schedule a good evening to go out and have lobster for dinner.  LOL.

Some of this stuff seems so simple to Me and yet I don't understand.  People involved in wiitwd are just like any other category slice of pie that you could assign to any other group.  Sure, that means that the chances are that if you look at all people under the kinky umbrella, you're going to find some in the bunch who specifically hate one gender or the other.  You could say the same thing if you based it on race, religion, orientation, or people who fly model airplanes. 

To Me, it just doesn't seem logical to hate an entire group of people when the basis for your reasoning is because of what some people who identify with that group did or said.  Why not judge the person for their own actions or opinions, rather than the category they belong to?

For the record, I don't hate Goreans.  I tend to even get along with some of them who chose to post around here.  I just know that the way of life doesn't mesh with My way of living Mine.  That's ok, because I'm betting that a lot of folks out there wouldn't be happy if they were living the way I do, either.

I guess what My lack of caffeine thought on the whole thing is, I'd really prefer to be judged for what I write and not on anything else.  Not My gender or whatever other different category I might fit into.  Agree with Me, don't agree with Me, tell Me I'm full of shit, or any other thing.  Just don't base what you think about what I say on some matter or another around here on the fact that I've got tits.




Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875