CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
Ok, a little rant of my own. "Mentors" do not have sexual or intimate relationships with their mentees. If the relationship is intimate and personal, it is a -romantic- relationship, not a "mentor" relationship. Mentorship is meant to be a highly valued state, with a great deal of responsibility and an ethical framework that assures that the mentee is going to have the opportunity to learn, and will not be preyed upon or mistreated. Within the BDSM realm, mentorship would, ideally, be between two individuals who share the same goals and direction -- one who has progressed a good way into the experience, and one a newcomer, looking to progress. If the "mentor" in question has authority over the mentee, then it isn't "mentorship", it is 'authority-exchange'. For example, as a dominant individual, I would not be doing someone exploring submission any great benefit by mentoring them, because they wouldn't be getting a picture of successful submission or service orientation from observing and learning from me... my capacity as a mentor would best serve another up-and-coming dominant or Head of Household... in particular, one who wanted to learn the in's and out's of things I am knowledgeable about, like Steampunk/AE households, temporary piercing, cutting, etc. (And I wouldn't serve someone well who wanted mentorship and who had wildly diverse interests from my own like shibari or cross-dressing... since I don't participate in those, I'd be useless as a mentor for someone who wanted to understand those better...) What the OP is describing is not mentorship, and assigning that name to it gives a very skewed picture of both her situation -and- the concept of mentorship. Calla
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|