RE: "Night of the global warmers."

RE: "Night of the global warmers." (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

pahunkboy -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 9:24:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Remember that when you get to pay Goldman Saches, JPM, royalties for life. When will these royalty payments start and if I'm paying them for nothing then what ultimately be the worth of what I pay them? I'm a selfish socialist meaning I want the value of my life to be measured beyond the criteria of wealth creation alone, at this point in time we value people according to if they add zeros to a GDP and consign those to the scrapheap that cost society financially. Just you remember that ignorance is bliss and the messenger always gets shot even on Tuesday! The global carbon tax. Copanhagen was laughing stock of the decade. Luckily we beat it for a year.

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 9:45:25 AM)
Well world governments made a commitment to state the measures they are enacting by the end of January and that isn't a year away. Then the next one could be in Mexico this year, the issue isn't going away pa. We 'warmists' are like dogs with a bone.

pahunkboy -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 9:48:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 Well world governments made a commitment to state the measures they are enacting by the end of January and that isn't a year away. Then the next one could be in Mexico this year, the issue isn't going away pa. We 'warmists' are like dogs with a bone. Just keep your hand off of my wallet and everything will be peachy. I tend to get pitt bull when anyone other then me is in my wallet.

Moonhead -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 10:06:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 Well world governments made a commitment to state the measures they are enacting by the end of January and that isn't a year away. Then the next one could be in Mexico this year, the issue isn't going away pa. We 'warmists' are like dogs with a bone. Just keep your hand off of my wallet and everything will be peachy. I tend to get pitt bull when anyone other then me is in my wallet. So you're not happy paying taxes for the military budget either?

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 10:07:41 AM)
You’re so $ focussed, don't you realise your contribution to the world doesn't have to be limited to gaining wealth? Was Ghandi wealthy, was Shakespeare wealthy, was Van Gogh wealthy? Are any of these peoples value to the world to be measured in wealth creation alone? If J.K. Rowling had existed in an era not so concerned with wealth creation would they have exploited her creation for movie dollars? Wealth is a fallacy it has no realistic meaning, when it goes beyond being a system to regulate the sharing goods and services it’s defunct.[:D]

mnottertail -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 10:15:09 AM)
his aim is not gaining wealth, insofar as I understand it, he is buying gold and silver, both of which are dropping like flies, so his aim is apparently that the rich get richer and the poor get kids. Ron

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 10:20:16 AM)
Well we don't know for sure Perhaps he is going down the route of gold finger and all he needs now to complete his goal is a nuclear bomb plot (theme also subsequently reincarnated in Die Hard With a Vengeance).

popeye1250 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 12:38:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Remember that when you get to pay Goldman Saches, JPM, royalties for life. When will these royalty payments start and if I'm paying them for nothing then what ultimately be the worth of what I pay them? I'm a selfish socialist meaning I want the value of my life to be measured beyond the criteria of wealth creation alone, at this point in time we value people according to if they add zeros to a GDP and consign those to the scrapheap that cost society financially. Just you remember that ignorance is bliss and the messenger always gets shot even on Tuesday! The global carbon tax. Copanhagen was laughing stock of the decade. Luckily we beat it for a year. PaHunk, don't get near those flat earthers! They're so brain-washed they're infectious. "Daddy, what is "science?" "That's a bad word son, don't ever use that word around global warming zombies!"

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 12:44:05 PM)
See your running scared of the truth, if we held no truth on our side we wouldn't be so infectious as you put it.

domiguy -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 12:52:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Remember those old "Zombie" movies from the 60's and 50's where the zombies would be walking around in a trance arms outstretched in front of them? How many times have you been shot in the head, but you refuse to die? You are not playing by the rules. But that means nothing to someone that clutches on to a preordained and programmed set of lies regardless of the facts ot truth. Small minds....Just another dittohead.

pahunkboy -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:09:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail his aim is not gaining wealth, insofar as I understand it, he is buying gold and silver, both of which are dropping like flies, so his aim is apparently that the rich get richer and the poor get kids. Ron lol. You are funny. I am up 85% on silver. ...20% on gold. or more to the point paper gold sunk that far.

Lucylastic -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:09:24 PM)
Domi, nice to have you back, youve been missed,

pahunkboy -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:15:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 You’re so $ focussed, don't you realise your contribution to the world doesn't have to be limited to gaining wealth? Was Ghandi wealthy, was Shakespeare wealthy, was Van Gogh wealthy? Are any of these peoples value to the world to be measured in wealth creation alone? If J.K. Rowling had existed in an era not so concerned with wealth creation would they have exploited her creation for movie dollars? Wealth is a fallacy it has no realistic meaning, when it goes beyond being a system to regulate the sharing goods and services it’s defunct.[:D] If you knew how much I run a household and car on the road for- you would be surprised. A global carbon tax would mean- the cost of the most basic household would escalate by at least 20%. my heat is on 58 today. You can not monetize pollution when there IS no money. The banks borrowed OUR money. And- even tho you view me as money-centric- the utilities don't take smiles to pay the bills. Not everybody lives the good live in America like you might think. Some here have no running water - and shante shacks for houses. and of course quality of life counts- which is why I do not work 60-80 hour weeks for a pile of bricks.

popeye1250 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:20:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 See your running scared of the truth, if we held no truth on our side we wouldn't be so infectious as you put it. "Our side?" "Faith over Evidence." SL4, send me an e-mail on that.

mnottertail -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:35:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail his aim is not gaining wealth, insofar as I understand it, he is buying gold and silver, both of which are dropping like flies, so his aim is apparently that the rich get richer and the poor get kids. Ron lol. You are funny. I am up 85% on silver. ...20% on gold. or more to the point paper gold sunk that far. silver going at 18 bucks, you bought it at 9 plus or minus pennies. what century did you buy it in? do the math. and of course we know you cant command spot price.

Lucylastic -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:42:18 PM)
Pops you sound crazier than a shithouse rat, your assumptions are bogus and make you look entirely bonkers, and you think "we" are bonkers... PS I have never watched anything or read anything by, supported, or recommended by al gore.

popeye1250 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:46:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Pops you sound crazier than a shithouse rat, your assumptions are bogus and make you look entirely bonkers, and you think "we" are bonkers... PS I have never watched anything or read anything by, supported, or recommended by al gore. Lucy, go into one of the global warming sites posing as a non-believer and try to argue with the zombies "against" their position using scientific studies and let us know what happens.

Lucylastic -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:51:10 PM)
I dont have any need to... Im getting called names here ..why go somewhere new where I have to defend myself to mere trolls? when I can just ignore you for certain posts:) no harm no foul

domiguy -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:52:22 PM)
Who are your sources, which esteemed scientist are providing you with the basis for your beliefs? You sound like just another dittohead unable to think for yourself. Follow your ambassadors of hate...What are you doing now that Lou is unable to feed you your beliefs? Oh, repeating old threads on global warming....You are becoming extremely repetitive, tiresome and boring.....pops, your record is skipping. Can someone give him a kick?

popeye1250 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/9/2010 1:58:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy Who are your sources, which esteemed scientist are providing you with the basis for your beliefs? You sound like just another dittohead unable to think for yourself. Follow your ambassadors of hate...What are you doing now that Lou is unable to feed you your beliefs? Oh, repeating old threads on global warming....You are becoming extremely repetitive, tiresome and boring.....pops, your record is skipping. Can someone give him a kick? Hey Buckwheat, it doesn't matter how much scientific information one has! When presented to the zombies they simply discard it, dismiss it or discredit it if it doesn't "agree" with their philosophy. It is the exact same thing as going into the Scientologists sites and trying to tell them that they're wrong. Same results!

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875