RE: "Night of the global warmers."

RE: "Night of the global warmers." (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

InvisibleBlack -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/11/2010 8:27:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Brain I saw yesterday they found a 450 million year old elephant and they called it a Woolly mammoth and they said they might use its DNA to make another one using a live elephant to give birth; apparently it was frozen for that long and well preserved. They can do it because the biologist was already doing it for animals that are endangered species. Can I get a dwarf one made up? Maybe about three feet long? I'd love to have a woolly mammoth as a pet!

popeye1250 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/11/2010 9:14:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub I sorta took this post as fun...damn i hope it doesn't become another of the many many many global warming arguments we've already had over and over a over again. Butch Kd, that's what I thought but the global warming zombies are so,.....~sensitive~. You don't have to "know" anything to be a zombie, just say you're "for" global warming and you're "in!" "Welcome to the club Bucko!" It's all about feeling good. It's an anal-retentive's wet dream! There "could, may, might be" global warming or,... "it's possable, probable, likely!" And you don't have to know anything about "science!" "We don't need no stinkin' science!" "Anybody asks any "difficult" questions and we just run that footage of the same ice shelf collapsing over and over and over again!" And it's a built in excuse too! Lose your car keys? "GLOBAL WARMING!!!" Are your testicles itchy? "GLOBAL WARMING!!!" Wife catch you fucking her best friend? "GLOBAL WARMING!!!" Did the boss catch you comming in late for work? "Fuck you, GLOBAL WARMING!!!"

willbeurdaddy -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/11/2010 10:34:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage I've never heard of them. Proof that the media are burying the most important science story of the century. (Or that DS lives under a bridge where there is no TV or radio reception)

Loki45 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/12/2010 4:52:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Dont put words in my mouth, and no, I do not believe in using such bad statistics as proof for warming, but of course if Im a tree hugger, I must be crazy about global warming huh?, BUT that just aint true. Its a bullshit reaction and one that brings out the reaction of a loud raspberry and relegation of their opinion to the garbage where it belongs. As your opinion means diddlysquat to me, its just a raspberry for you.well done As I said, Im not getting into a BS filled argument, and you just made my point, Making assumptions makes an ass, etc etc. LoL. Actually, this reply proves a totally off-topic point I've been making for a long, long time. Your "emotional" and "irrational" reaction to my post was totally unwarranted. I put no words in anything. I simply asked a question. I asked a question and just look at the 5-line rant that I get in reply calling me names and telling me my opinion doesn't matter. Can I offer you a midol? [sm=rofl.gif]

Moonhead -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/12/2010 4:55:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Brain I saw yesterday they found a 450 million year old elephant and they called it a Woolly mammoth and they said they might use its DNA to make another one using a live elephant to give birth; apparently it was frozen for that long and well preserved. They can do it because the biologist was already doing it for animals that are endangered species. The Russians tried that in the '70s and it didn't work: the host mother miscarried the thing after a couple of months. Did you know that the Siberians used to think that mammoths were huge moles that caused earthquakes?

Lucylastic -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/12/2010 6:38:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Loki45 LoL. Actually, this reply proves a totally off-topic point I've been making for a long, long time. Your "emotional" and "irrational" reaction to my post was totally unwarranted. I put no words in anything. I simply asked a question. I asked a question and just look at the 5-line rant that I get in reply calling me names and telling me my opinion doesn't matter. Can I offer you a midol? [sm=rofl.gif] now thats what I call a calm, rational response.[8\|]

Loki45 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/12/2010 10:19:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic now thats what I call a calm, rational response.[8\|] You get what you give. (Or didn't anyone ever tell you that?) You see it all the time in old black and white movies. When the woman gets hysterical and starts freaking out. Every once in a while a man just has to slap her to calm her down.

AsmodaisSin -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/12/2010 10:21:31 AM)
Yeah...global warming...not so much. It's frickin' cold.

DarlingSavage -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/13/2010 3:34:41 PM)
quote: (Or that DS lives under a bridge where there is no TV or radio reception) You caught me, I don't watch TV, I do however, listen to NPR from time to time. However, it's been a while. I really don't see how some emails have anything to do with scientific research, though. And, Popeye, I do know scientific research, it's what I do. I've spent lots and lots of money on learning how to do research, how to recognize real scientific research, and how to tell real research from propoganda and advertisements. Oh, by the way, it's a balmy 72 degrees down here in Denton, TX today!

popeye1250 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/13/2010 3:51:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage quote: (Or that DS lives under a bridge where there is no TV or radio reception) You caught me, I don't watch TV, I do however, listen to NPR from time to time. However, it's been a while. I really don't see how some emails have anything to do with scientific research, though. And, Popeye, I do know scientific research, it's what I do. I've spent lots and lots of money on learning how to do research, how to recognize real scientific research, and how to tell real research from propoganda and advertisements. Oh, by the way, it's a balmy 72 degrees down here in Denton, TX today! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNWIatFCH1Q&feature=related

DarlingSavage -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/13/2010 4:08:16 PM)
Well, considering that you haven't produced any verifiable citations...

kdsub -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/13/2010 5:20:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub I sorta took this post as fun...damn i hope it doesn't become another of the many many many global warming arguments we've already had over and over a over again. Butch Lose your car keys? "GLOBAL WARMING!!!" Are your testicles itchy? "GLOBAL WARMING!!!" Wife catch you fucking her best friend? "GLOBAL WARMING!!!" Did the boss catch you comming in late for work? "Fuck you, GLOBAL WARMING!!!" Decide to wear panties and hose....damn Global warming Decide to go streak in...Global warming I may get to like the idea of global warming. Butch

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/13/2010 5:31:00 PM)
Extensive annual flooding of low lying areas "Global warming" Greater number of tornadoes year on year "Global warming" Reduction in marine life "Global warming" Plants flowering earlier "Global warming" Changing patterns of bird migration "Global warming" Melting of permafrost on mountain ranges "Global warming" Increase in fissures and flowing rivers within polar ice caps "Global warming" Increase in hot air production from those on the political right "Global warming"

popeye1250 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/13/2010 5:33:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 Extensive annual flooding of low lying areas "Global warming" Greater number of tornadoes year on year "Global warming" Reduction is marine life "Global warming" Plants flowering earlier "Global warming" Changing patterns of bird migration "Global warming" Melting of permafrost on mountain ranges "Global warming" Increase in fissures and flowing rivers within polar ice caps "Global warming" Increase in hot air production from those on the political right "Global warming" SL4, you could you could end all those statements with, "Overpopulation." Maybe the voo doo gods are trying to tell us something.

kdsub -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/14/2010 8:18:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 Extensive annual flooding of low lying areas "Global warming" Greater number of tornadoes year on year "Global warming" Reduction in marine life "Global warming" Plants flowering earlier "Global warming" Changing patterns of bird migration "Global warming" Melting of permafrost on mountain ranges "Global warming" Increase in fissures and flowing rivers within polar ice caps "Global warming" Increase in hot air production from those on the political right "Global warming" You see I have not gave my opinion of global warming in this thread...if you go back through the many you would know it...I have a unique view that could save the world and I mean that. But as a sidebar my area of the world would benefit from global warming I am told...Global warming is not bad for all just some. Butch

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/14/2010 8:31:56 AM)
Perhaps you may benefit from global warming in the short term but eventually you'll be indirectly killing whole ecologies that you depend on in a way you may not yet realise. There isn’t anything positive long term about it because these complex systems we don’t realise we need to survive exist with a finite balance and have done so for eons. You’ll see more consequences and at first you won’t make the direct link but eventually you will; this has been the problem with the climate science (it has taken us too long to realise these connections). Popeye uses this as a kind of “how could all these things relate to the climate of the world” argument, ignoring that studies have been done and these studies are why we became concerned with the whole issue in the first place. It isn't often the case that people do studies to prove or disprove global warming as a first priority. They notice something such as bird migration, they find a pattern of it changing over a certain time period and they then try to find out why that is happening. It is backwards thinking that someone is paying scientists to conduct studies to prove climate science because usually the studies come about for the desire to study something completely unrelated.

MasterCord -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/14/2010 9:19:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic what is more important to you Pops? your "kids' financial or environmental future?? Oh please...."global warming" has been proven to be junk science farce.....a classic case of "....if the facts disprove your theory they must be disposed of...". 2010 cannot come fast enough so we can take these stooges out of office....... MC

kittinSol -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/14/2010 9:20:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterCord 2010 cannot come fast enough so we can take these stooges out of office....... I don't know which planet you're from but here, on Planet Earth, we're a couple of weeks into it.

MasterCord -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/14/2010 9:27:19 AM)
With all due respect...not in this case. In the case of "global warming"...a conclusion was reached from iffy science, and then a massive effort was made to find things to back it up. "Ready....shoot...aim." Trouble is, they deleted all the information (including over 80% of the climatological data from one of the colder land masses on the planet - 16% of the planet's land mass by the way...) that disproved the theory until they had the political answer they needed. I note that no one in the GW crowd quoted the evolving scientific theory that says reducing CO2 may threaten agriculture of the large scale needed to feed a growing planet population. But.....nah.....dead bodies are cold and therefore do not contribute to global warming. Well...maybe the release of methane will be a problem?....hmmm....cremation? (sp?)....nah...particulate emissions... I am all in favor of improving the environment....I see nothing wrong with working to reduce some sorts of emissions....right the big wrongs...that is a worthy goal.....but not based on the farcical "science" of GW which is really a mask for global political reorganization and taxation. MC quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 Perhaps you may benefit from global warming in the short term but eventually you'll be indirectly killing whole ecologies that you depend on in a way you may not yet realise. There isn’t anything positive long term about it because these complex systems we don’t realise we need to survive exist with a finite balance and have done so for eons. You’ll see more consequences and at first you won’t make the direct link but eventually you will; this has been the problem with the climate science (it has taken us too long to realise these connections). Popeye uses this as a kind of “how could all these things relate to the climate of the world” argument, ignoring that studies have been done and these studies are why we became concerned with the whole issue in the first place. It isn't often the case that people do studies to prove or disprove global warming as a first priority. They notice something such as bird migration, they find a pattern of it changing over a certain time period and they then try to find out why that is happening. It is backwards thinking that someone is paying scientists to conduct studies to prove climate science because usually the studies come about for the desire to study something completely unrelated.

Lucylastic -> RE: "Night of the global warmers." (1/14/2010 9:32:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterCord quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic what is more important to you Pops? your "kids' financial or environmental future?? Oh please...."global warming" has been proven to be junk science farce.....a classic case of "....if the facts disprove your theory they must be disposed of...". 2010 cannot come fast enough so we can take these stooges out of office....... MC I never mentioned global warming, numbnuts, I said "environmental future" you are going to be lots of fun. what was your old name?????

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 [5] 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.171875