Sanity
Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006 From: Nampa, Idaho USA Status: offline
|
If the one statement that you think Snopes has found that may actually be called "racist" by serious people happened... then Rush should not apologize. Why? Because when you call into an "insult radio" radio program you should expect to be insulted. Duh! Its a lot like D/s, its consensual humiliation and there should be no need for Rush to apologize, though according your own source claims that he admitted feeling guilt over it. So like you said with Harry Reid, you have to forgive him because he's sorry, and thats the best anyone can do. quote:
Claim: Snopes.com Is Unfairly Attacking Rush Limbaugh Status: True Snopes: Certainly the most notorious racial remark attributed to Limbaugh is his telling a black caller on his radio talk show to "Take that bone out of your nose and call me again" The entire basis for this story is an article titled Mouth At Work I'll tell you everything you need to know,' says Rush Limbaugh. `You need never read a newspaper again. I'll read them for you and tell you what to think.' by Richard Gehr in the October 8, 1990 issue of Newsday. No other documentation is offered by Snopes to corroborate this charge against Rush Limbaugh. Indeed, Snopes itself admits that "Nearly all the information available on this subject is anecdotal". With only one newspaper article with a long-winded title to support this claim it's not a very strong case, but let's take a look at it anyway. Snopes: (This incident occurred not on Rush Limbaugh's now-familiar talk and political commentary radio program, but at the beginning of his broadcast career back in the early 1970s when he was hosting a Top 40 music show under the name "Jeff Christie" on either WIXZ or KQV in Pittsburgh.) Already Snopes is admitting in a way that "Rush Limbaugh" didn't say this, but rather Rush Limbaugh, playing the role of "Jeff Christie" on the radio back in the 70's, said this. Radio, like the movies, is show business, right? So why are radio DJ's held to a different standard than movie actors and actresses? If Sean Penn were to say something equally outrageous while playing a character in a movie, should we then attribute all those lines to "Sean Penn"? But the most damning evidence against Snopes is contained in the Newsday article itself. Newsday: Recalling a stint as an "insult-radio" DJ in Pittsburgh, he admits feeling guilty about, for example, telling a black listener he could not understand to "take that bone out of your nose and call me back." Why did Snopes neglect to mention the "insult-radio" format? This is NOT a trivial omission. And do we still have to explain that the insult routine, whether on stage or on the radio, is all schtick, that it's an act? Or are we all still upset by all those mean things Don Rickles said to Johnny Carson on his show years ago? Snopes: Since Rush Limbaugh presumably wouldn't have expressed feelings of guilt over an apocryphal story, and as far as we know he hasn't ever denied or disclaimed what Newsday reported he told them, we have to put this one in the "true" column. Not exactly a high standard, is it? So I guess now all it takes for a story to be "True" on Snopes is for it to be published somewhere, and never denied personally by the accused. Like, say, the Juanita Broaddrick story, for example. I'll let you know when they post it on Snopes. quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Personally, Popeye, I consider the term archaic at best. While it is true the census bureau has the term on the census forms, I would have thought that it would be out of use by now. However, I said I considered Reid's words out of place and definitely in poor taste. He apologized which is all anyone can do. Rush has made no attempt to apologize for his comments. http://www.tommcmahon.net/2003/12/claim_snopescom.html
< Message edited by Sanity -- 1/18/2010 6:04:07 AM >
_____________________________
Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out
|