RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room'

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Moonhead -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 3:25:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse They have a right to work where they want. It's the politically correct thing to do.. Which PC stuff the conservatives who'd defend them doing that job have had time for in any other context when, exactly?

Musicmystery -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 3:30:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse They have a right to work where they want. That's not in question. What is in question is the willingness to do the job once they're there.

popeye1250 -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 4:06:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse 'religious superstition'. Some see protecting the life of an unborn child a little differently. Some don't care. It's awfully convenient how the cannibal cult that worships the invisible sky wizard find "religious" justifications for the things they personally don't like yet eschew those same tenets when it suits their needs. ~stef Well, that's the Democrats for ya! Who you voting for tommorrow Stef?

servantforuse -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 4:27:40 PM)
Maybe the pro-life democrats, who out number the republicans 3 to 1 will deny Martha Coakley the peoples seat.

Moonhead -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 4:43:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse Maybe the pro-life democrats, who out number the republicans 3 to 1 will deny Martha Coakley the peoples seat. The democrats aren't as homogenous as the Republicans, though. That's why the Healthcare bill is such a shambles: they didn't need Leiberman and the Republicans fillibustering it when they had to include all sorts of ridiculous crap to keep the lunatic right fringe of the party happy.

servantforuse -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 4:46:56 PM)
They didn't need the republicans at all. They were to chicken to pas it without their support.

Moonhead -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 4:50:19 PM)
Not so much chicken as incapable. The Republicans march in lockstep. The Democrats is full of all sorts of mentally ill wankers who got into the party because they aren't Republicans, despite many of them leaning even further to the right. If they were this Marxist mass mind the right* makes them out to be, do you think they've had any trouble getting a public provider clause through?

maybemaybenot -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 4:54:39 PM)
"The Republicans march in lockstep" This cracks me up... how ironic as the Democratic machine both here and in DC are trying to figure out how to prevent Brown from voting on the HC bill if he is elected. And that moron from CNBC < Ed Schultz > saying if he lived here he would do anything he could to stuff the ballot box. Please !! I tell you what, if I lived in Massachusetts I'd try to vote 10 times," said Schultz on his Friday radio show. "I don't know if they'd let me or not, but I'd try to. Yeah, that's right. I'd cheat to keep these bastards out. I would. 'Cause that's exactly what they are- Ed Schultz

Lucylastic -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 4:57:43 PM)
if they are trying to figure it out..... they aint all marching lockstep...if they were they would have had it figured out soon after Kennedy passed on, not at the last minute. fighting and other bollocks doesnt show perfect marching in lockstep

maybemaybenot -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:00:33 PM)
They are exploring multiple options.... together they will try and block his seating if he wins. That's lockstep.

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:18:16 PM)
I really have to smile at this one.... I cannot believe that some of the people here who defended smoking bans in bars and night clubs because of the health concerns over non smoking employees and HOWLED when the argument, "maybe they should work elsewhere" is ever made are walking lock step with Coakley on this. Amazing! It really is. quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy I wonder if she thinks non-smokers shouldn't work in bars and restaurants that allow smoking too... I am guessing not.

kittinSol -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:21:26 PM)
Patients should get the medical care they need. There really should be no argument to be had.

servantforuse -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:21:55 PM)
It's the same old double standard that republicans have had to deal with.

Lucylastic -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:26:07 PM)
Patients should get the medical care they need.

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:26:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse They didn't need the republicans at all. They were to chicken to pas it without their support. You mean the definition of "chicken shit" now includes standing together in opposition of a "common cause/law", that does not reflect the views of votes of their constituents? Tell me how the solidarity of the Republican Party was "chicken-shit"? If this is such a damn noble bill.... why do you care whether they voted for it or not? Why do you think the Democrats need cover from them?

kittinSol -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:28:01 PM)
Are you arguing that patients shouldn't get the medical care they need because they struck unlucky at the medical lottery? Really?

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:31:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kittinSol Patients should get the medical care they need. There really should be no argument to be had. And Nurses and Doctors should get Religious freedom they need...without threat of being fired, that includes allowing them their veiws on when life begins... unless you want goverment deciding that eh Sunkittin? Do you want goverment defining the moment of life???

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:32:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kittinSol Are you arguing that patients shouldn't get the medical care they need because they struck unlucky at the medical lottery? Really? Not sure which post this was referring too

Lucylastic -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:35:23 PM)
Of course they are entitled to their views bloody hell where has that been denied what is wrong is when they bring these "beliefs" as a reason to deny someone else care. to exercise that belief, should not interfere with someone elses health. You wouldnt expect a sausage factory to stop using pork because a Jew or Muslim employee wanted to stop handling pork.

kittinSol -> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room' (1/18/2010 5:38:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy quote: ORIGINAL: kittinSol Patients should get the medical care they need. There really should be no argument to be had. And Nurses and Doctors should get Religious freedom they need...without threat of being fired, that includes allowing them their veiws on when life begins... unless you want goverment deciding that eh Sunkittin? Do you want goverment defining the moment of life??? Sure they can decide when life begins for themselves. They have no business being in the jobs they're in, however, if they make moral decisions for patients that have different beliefs from theirs. They're not in the job to impose their views and beliefs on everyone else: they're in the job to provide legal medical services to patients. If they don't like it, they should change professions. It's very simple, really.

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.2167969