Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
|
Happy to DK, but I need a bit of advice on just how to do that as it is easier said than done. Most of the most important material I have is in four file cabinets, or they are the destination. I just moved. After finding everything I will scan it, and leave it in JPG format to ensure some degree of authenticity. I might have to dig up a floppy disk reader as well because that's where my UCC files are. At that point then I can send attachments via email. This includes statutes, trial transcripts and other things that are just about impossible to find on the net. So what am I to do ? Ignore the people I personally know who have won this game as if they never existed ?
And this is not superior knowledge, every US Citizen should be familiar with this type of material. People have no idea how they get bamboozled all the time, and have some stupid notion that a good lawyer will save them. A lawyer will not embarrass the court, but I will. One of the sharpest tools in the box is contradictions in law or procedure. Gently as a sheep you ask the court which is right, this or that ? Anything written must be filed with the clerk of courts to hinder it's exclusion. The supreme court decision quoted earlier is a perfect axample. You can hand it up to the judge and he can wipe his ass with it, but once a matter of public record it stands, and there is proof that the court was provided with the evidence in law.
In other words, I can indeed prove it, but how much time do you have, and indeed how much time do I have ? It took well over ten years to amass all this, even if I dedicated a whole day and presented all of it you would take some time to assimilate it.
For example, in 2004 I made the mistake of driving through DUI city, otherwise known as Linndale. They'll give you a DUI even if you had one light beer. Once the accusation is made, your ride is over. Then they get you in the room. If you refuse the breathalyzer you sign a paper to that effect. Well since they wanted my signature, I took their pen and scratched out certain words. I read it carefully and got rid of anything that was self implicating. Certain WORDS.
My lawyer smiled when he saw it. He came out of the prosecutor's office with the sweetest deal I'd ever seen. They simply could not make it stick. When he showed me the deal, I said "That's all they want ? ". So sometimes it is not a complete and decisive win. But how in the hell could I prove that ? When the case was closed who knows where all these documents go ? If they are a matter of public record I would like to know where to find certified copies. Bout the only way to prove it I can see.
I am receptive to any advice on what could constitute proof. I think it's a problem when the majority of people who walk into a courtroom automatically think they already lost, and are just there to negotiate how bad they lost. I really want to know what would constitute satisfactory proof because then I would shout it from every mountaintop. I would be ten times worse than Hunky.
I would send you all of it, but I might need it someday. Nobody can remember all of this. In a matter of seconds I can tell you how to play chess, but I can't give you strategy in such a short time. In this case, the game remains the same, but the documents change. There is a case cite in this thread, valid as it may be, it would be useless if one is into it with the zoning commission or the IRS. Don't even get me started on them.
A recent Ohio supreme court decision did shoot most of this right to travel thing down. But that will vary from state to state. They actually changed the game, tilting the playing field in their advantage.
Let's take that one. They ruled that driving on the public roads, no matter what you call it is a priveledge. Why did they have to do that ? Obviously someone had a pretty damn good case I would think. The Ohio supreme court involved in a traffic case ? There must be good reason no ?
So now most of us just knuckle down, get plates and shut up. The fight is not worth it at this time. Repression, it sure is. For the the greater good, public safety and all that ? Ostensibly. A big money game ? Definitely.
So I could make copies and you could go get a BIG P.O. box. Or I could scan and send everything in email, which would save me a ton of paper. It'll probably take 200-300 MB of harddrive space. Which do you prefer ?
T
|
RE: Common-law Right to Travel - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread