hardbodysub
Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
Here is a bit of the reality. Even though a great deal of men claim to be submissive, I -- and several dominant women that I discuss with as well as a few submissive men -- have come to the conclusion that the ones that truly want to be submissive to a woman in the bulk of a dynamic such as in a female-led relationship are rare. The bulk of the men coming her to discuss their fetishes are often in fantasy dreamland and they want the payoff but not the commitment of submitting Ah, perception does cloud reality, does it not? The more I see here, the more I am led to believe that the real friction is between those who want D/s and those who want B/D, S/M, or T/b. The D/s folks exclude B&D, S&M, and T/b "subs" from the definition of "submissive". The B&D, S&M, and T/b folks use the term more generally. A high percentage of female dominants who post on CM are looking for D/s. A high percentage of male "subs" posting on CM are looking for B&D, S&M, or T/b, and even though they might want some D/s with it, they are not as strongly focused on the D/s as the female dominants want. The "reality" as I see it: D/s adherents consider the word "submissive" to be exclusively under their domain. Anyone else using that term to describe themselves is being at best unrealistic, or at worst, dishonest. Perhaps others should use the terms "bottom" or "masochist" instead of "submissive", but that doesn't really work, because there are all shades of gray in this realm. A lot of people really are submissive to a certain degree, and to say that they shouldn't use that word because their submission doesn't extend as far as you would like doesn't work very well either. It's too bad we can't just say what we like and don't like, look for people who match, and don't worry about the rest.
|