Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in an honorable way.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in an honorable way. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 7:30:26 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Not passion, just a cold observation. You don't like the checks and balances and want to remove some of them - you've argued on Hugo Chavez' behalf before, so I'm thinking you wouldn't even mind having a dictator in charge, as long as he thought exactly like you do.


Oh Sanity, just bullshit from you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
See Kirata's post for a better explanation than mine of why the Senate is what it is, but what it boils down to is that if the smaller states such as Wyoming didn't have a say in matters they would either succeed or go to war. Guerrilla war if need be, but war just the same.


I have seen it. I have answered it.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 7:38:59 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline


quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

In order for meaningful change to happen two things have to happen, in my opinion.  First, outlaw lobbyists.  It seems our elected representatives vote the will of the lobby, not the people.  Second, make it a conflict of interest for a lawyer to make law.  I trust a room full of wrestlers, actors, and comedians more than I trust a room full of lawyers.


Funny you should say that .... Jesse Ventura, Ronald Reagan, Al Franken

Not criticizing your comment. Just struck me that we have had one of each at least.


quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

Um........ that's exactly why I used those professions, it wasn't an accident... I just thought everybody already knew that.   Even Sonny Bono made a better congressman than a singer.  Well, he could have made a better ski instructor than a singer.  Sorry.... too soon?


I was a little slow on the uptake on your choices. Still half asleep.
Nope. I don't think it's too soon re Sonny.

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

It would be really nice if we could have representatives that were doctors, construction workers, waiters, farmers, etc.   I wonder what would happen if we chose representatives like we choose juries?  But then we'd end up with a congress that's too stupid to come up with a valid excuse not to serve.  Not sure if that would be better or worse than what we have now.


Not sure they would not be just as easily picked off by lobbiests. And of course each would want a staff... probably lawyers there. Possibly term limits would help. I'm not sure of that either though.



< Message edited by vincentML -- 1/21/2010 7:41:02 AM >


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to eyesopened)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 7:42:19 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

No, it's not bullshit, vince. That's really what I'm thinkin'.






< Message edited by Sanity -- 1/21/2010 7:55:32 AM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 7:59:44 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


No, it's not bullshit, vince. That's what I'm thinkin'.



Think what you will, Sanity. No problem to me the muck in your mind. I recognize the feeble debate trick to make accusations of intent or poor character against an opponent rather than counter points on the issue. Laughable if that is the best you can do.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 8:11:06 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
FR

Voting doesn't do it anymore. We are but sheep going to the polls to vote upon whether we will starve to death or freeze to death. Those are the only options provided, which is for you Sir ?

People, people more educated on the law than I are already working to find ways to change this. Lawful ways. The means do exist, but alot of specific information is needed to make it stick, and of course same is not so forthcoming. It can and does work if done right, as I do remember some governor in CA that got ousted for his intention to coddle illegal immigrants. Anyone remember his name ? No ? GOOD !

Now we are talking about a governor, elected by the whole state, a senator only needs half a state (in theory) and should be easier to impeach or oust in the same manner. By the same theory one tenth of a state should be easily able to instigate a recall election for a congressman.

They accomplished this quite easily in CA because the problem ws right in everyone's face. So that statefull of racists like me, who value citizenship in this country got rid of some totally idiotic leader (supposedly) whom they had previously elected. Read me politicians, if it can happen to him, it can happen to YOU.

Lazy or not, no one Man can gather enough information to make these things really stick. Someone has to watch everything they do. Unlike this forum where our heads are directed to this guy and then that guy, whole political parties in fact, we need to go after them individually. Remember, divide and conquer. For that we need some solidarity. Perhaps the recall in CA was started by one person, but public support gained critical mass in notime. The reason again, was that the problem was right in their face.

A small coalition could watch every move, every vote, every contribution (read bribe) taken by one of these supposed "representatives". Using all the tools of the trade, just like the PTB make a good case that this one's a rat, and disseminate that information. For a congressman, that would entail enlightening less than one million people. For a senator a bit more. For a governor a bit more.

Knowledge is power, and knowledge shared is power lost, unless........ Well you, or us, like anyone else only share the knowledge that is needed to garner the support. The opponenets take care of their side. We need to objective like we need a hole in the head. They are not, therefore it must not be one of the rules of the game right ? You take every advantage you can, just like they do. Except for lying. I won't engage in that, but everything else is fair game. Run the commercials with that piano playing in the background, footage of people who got fucked over by the dirty deeds of the politicians. The crying, the expressive (if none other) outrage. The works.

While I still advocate something much more drastic, like a march on Washington, armed and so forth, it wouldn't work. You need enough people on your side with alot of balls. There simply aren't enough with that kind of mettle anymore. But something that operates within the law, especially if effective, would be alot more palatable to the general public.

Popular support is of the utmost importance. You can't even convince people that they can fight a fucking traffic ticket anymore, and these people are intelligent, just ignorant of parts of the law. Even if you think we are stuck with a duly elected President, they can still be recalled. We are indeed stuck, but by our own inaction, not the law.

Perhaps a Citizens' initiative. Start one as soon as the election is over. A team would review every move they make and present a scorecard, or report card as it were on each and every one of those who betray us every day. Eventually the treason adds up to the point where enough signatures can be gleaned to force a recall. On EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM. Every day.

People are afraid of guns now, and even marching in the streets. This method requires neither. This would make it acceptable to alot more people, which is elemental to such a project's success. But if you really want change that is the best way to do it at the present time.

If such a thing were to happen, I bet my brain on the fact that they will retaliate, by passing new legislation hindering the recall process. Argue against that. The incumbents want to stay incumbent. After that, I think it possible that guns and marching in the streets will be less of a challenge for many. And many is the keyword. Without many, it simply doesn't work.

In a way it is sort of reverse voting. I see it as the only way at this time. But overall, succeed or fail, it will raise the average Joe Sixpack's awareness of what is going on in the world.

Any other ideas ? I am all ears.

T

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 8:40:44 AM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
quote:

kill all lawyers.
Been reading your Shakespeare I see

_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 8:42:11 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
To me it is a disgrace and an embarrassment that many of our elected officials are actually afraid to vote the way they think best for America


Who says each group isn't voting as a block in the way they think is best for America? I think both sides wish to make things better. They just cannot agree on how to go about it.



This.

The reason for what appears to be block voting is that the issues are ideological at their core. Representing your constituents is the politicians job, and they were largely elected based on an ideology. Exacerbating the issue is that when the Dems had a supermajority they totally shut out any Republican comments and amendments. You would get far less block voting when both parties actually have input to legislation.

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 1/21/2010 8:47:51 AM >

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 8:50:29 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

It can and does work if done right, as I do remember some governor in CA that got ousted for his intention to coddle illegal immigrants. Anyone remember his name ? No ? GOOD !


Do I recall it incorrectly? I thought your govenor was caught up in the scandle caused by Enron's speculation on energy and so causing brownouts and higher electric bills in CA.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

A small coalition could watch every move, every vote, every contribution (read bribe) taken by one of these supposed "representatives". Using all the tools of the trade, just like the PTB make a good case that this one's a rat, and disseminate that information. For a congressman, that would entail enlightening less than one million people. For a senator a bit more. For a governor a bit more.

Knowledge is power, and knowledge shared is power lost, unless........ Well you, or us, like anyone else only share the knowledge that is needed to garner the support.


T, aren't there many watchdog groups? Additionally, is that not the role of the Press as well? arguably, the latter has failed their task and the former can gather information but often lacks the money and network to motivate voters except in extraordinary situations.
Just my thought.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 9:41:52 AM   
MichiganHeadmast


Posts: 726
Joined: 8/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

In order for meaningful change to happen two things have to happen, in my opinion.  First, outlaw lobbyists.  It seems our elected representatives vote the will of the lobby, not the people.  Second, make it a conflict of interest for a lawyer to make law.  I trust a room full of wrestlers, actors, and comedians more than I trust a room full of lawyers.


Funny you should say that .... Jesse Ventura, Ronald Reagan, Al Franken

Not criticizing your comment. Just struck me that we have had one of each at least.


Hmmm, don't see a comedian in that list anywhere.....

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 9:43:17 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
As far as the senate bill is concerned the Democrats voted as a block...I believe two or three republicans voted with them the rest against.

To me anything over 90 percent of any group should be considered a block vote…way past what would be a normal division if the average American were to vote on the same bill.

Butch


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 9:49:42 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

It's quite probable that I will never vote for another democrat as long as i live. I already vowed several years ago never to vote for another republican, and now that the democrats have completely failed yet again to effect any meaningful change, I have no reason to ever vote for them again either. Neither party represents me, so why should i vote for them?


Panda I don't care who you vote far but voting for neither without a viable third alternative is wasting your vote. Surely one or the other most closely represents your views.

It there were an alternative that could be elected and matched my views I would vote for them ...otherwise I vote for the one that is at least not the most against my views.... It is pitiful but I can't see throwing away my vote on someone like a Nader or a libertarian.

Butch

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 9:53:24 AM   
SirAldwyn


Posts: 44
Joined: 10/15/2009
Status: offline
The system is very broke,  People elected care more about the money to keep them elected then doing what is best for this country.  Both parties have sold out to whoever gives them the most money

Just take healthcare, not about where you or I stand but from a lobbying point of view, The Chamber of Commerce spent between 70-100 million against this bill (it was on the news last week), and insurance lobbying spent another 40-50 million with a huge amount left to spend

This had nothing to do with what the people of this country wanted, it was money spent to protect the interest of corporate america, to keep the golden goose egg of profits for the insurance companies Hell just look at what their stocks did yesterday,

No matter where you stand, the only voice heard was the voice of the insurance industry, and their money did all the talking they needed



(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 9:53:41 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

In order for meaningful change to happen two things have to happen, in my opinion.  First, outlaw lobbyists.  It seems our elected representatives vote the will of the lobby, not the people.  Second, make it a conflict of interest for a lawyer to make law.  I trust a room full of wrestlers, actors, and comedians more than I trust a room full of lawyers.


I so agree about lobbyists...but others have pointed out that would be unconstitutional...I don't agree... I think there should only be allowed personal contributions to elections and a limit of $2,000 max. That would take away the need to reward large donations with law.

Butch


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to eyesopened)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 9:54:43 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AsmodaisSin

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Actually if Democrats voted as a block on anything this would have all been settled back in July. That republican politicians endanger their careers by differing from their party's leaders on even a single vote is one reason I will never support them.


And the fact that the democrats blatantly disregard what their constituents want or don't want is any better?  MOST people do not want this health care bill to pass as is.  ALL the people I know want health care reform/change, but they do NOT want it in this form. 

With that being said, if there were a worthy democratic candidate who somehow agreed with my political views, I'd vote for him/her in a heartbeat.



Prove it

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to AsmodaisSin)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 10:05:05 AM   
SirAldwyn


Posts: 44
Joined: 10/15/2009
Status: offline
I find this and interesting comment.  I mean since the very day healthcare reform was mention, the GOP said all they wanted to do was kill this bill, to make it O'bama's waterloo, to vote nothing but NO, and they spent alot of time bitching about what was wrong instead of working on something that would work.

I think O'bama's problem was that he tried to make this a partisan bill (you can read the news from last summer about every attempt he made with the GOP) and all they did was say NO and support the big money interests

And if memory serves correctly, it seems any party in charge cares very little about what the other party has to say or offer, why just look back a few years

The problem as I see it, is people elected into office are strong armed to vote the party line, no matter what the people who put them in office say.

Just look at all the elected officials who voted NO to the Stim bill, then go back home and take credit for the good it has done.  How is that not party line thinking?

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 10:05:15 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

The Senate was conceived as the "States' House" when we were primarily an agricultural population... We are no longer an agricultural population.

The Senate was conceived when our navy moved under sail in wooden ships, too, and when the only ground transporation was horse and wagon. None of those things are relevant to the fact that we are a union of states, and to tell a few of them that they aren't going to have any effective say in anything anymore because their populations are too small reduces them to vassal territories. If that's your idea of a good thing, I respectfully disagree. I don't like our government's imperialistic approach to foreign policy, and I don't want it pulling the same shit here at home either.

K.




< Message edited by Kirata -- 1/21/2010 10:14:38 AM >

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 10:14:54 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


If the Democrats had paid attention to the people more Democratic Congressmen would have joined the Republicans in opposing that monstrous legislation as well as the underhanded methods used to craft it.

I am wondering - can they hear us now?

The system's not that broke. We have the means in place to effect a peaceful revolution every two years if need be, and the people of Massachusetts just reminded Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama of that very fact.




Sanity I would agree if the Republicans had came out with a viable alternative...but their whole Idea is to block what the Democrats propose not work together for a compromise that would allow the badly needed changes in our system...too many Americans are dieing compared to other civilized societies that have addressed this problem.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 10:18:33 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
To me it is a disgrace and an embarrassment that many of our elected officials are actually afraid to vote the way they think best for America


Who says each group isn't voting as a block in the way they think is best for America? I think both sides wish to make things better. They just cannot agree on how to go about it.




If you were to take three hundred people or so and give them the time to study this bill their votes would not be distributed along party lines...They would vote on what was best for them.

There would be a good portion of people of all political parties voting one way or the other.

Butch


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 11:05:18 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Instead of sinking down into your empty and lowly personal attacks vincent, why don't you address what I wrote.

Do you deny defending Hugo Chavez, or that Chavez's obvious goal is to become dictator? Or do you deny advocating that larger states be given the power to ride roughshod over smaller states?

Or is the reason you're suddenly become so angry and so ugly here is that its impossible for you to deny any of it, and so you resort to these despicable tactics.


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Think what you will, Sanity. No problem to me the muck in your mind. I recognize the feeble debate trick to make accusations of intent or poor character against an opponent rather than counter points on the issue. Laughable if that is the best you can do.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in ... - 1/21/2010 11:14:33 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichiganHeadmast

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

In order for meaningful change to happen two things have to happen, in my opinion.  First, outlaw lobbyists.  It seems our elected representatives vote the will of the lobby, not the people.  Second, make it a conflict of interest for a lawyer to make law.  I trust a room full of wrestlers, actors, and comedians more than I trust a room full of lawyers.


Funny you should say that .... Jesse Ventura, Ronald Reagan, Al Franken

Not criticizing your comment. Just struck me that we have had one of each at least.


Hmmm, don't see a comedian in that list anywhere.....



Either of the first two perhaps?

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to MichiganHeadmast)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The US congress refuses to represent the people in an honorable way. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094