RE: E Pluribus Unum

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: E Pluribus Unum

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: E Pluribus Unum

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: E Pluribus Unum - 1/24/2010 2:23:11 PM

Real0ne

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: RealOne

I told you the name of the book and where to get it and if that is not good enough for you, that you would rather mischaractize the matter then I guess you get the big fuck you eh....

Youre correct, it isnt good enough for me. Its nice to see that when asked for clarification all you can produce is foul language.

look pal; when I tell you that I will give you the source if and when I run across it and a mere couple posts later I in fact did give you the name of the source (long before you posted this nonsense), and you have the gall to accuse me of being anything but straight up with you about it makes you a fraud.

Failing to correct your error after you made the accusations and I pointed it out to you makes you a liar.

get it

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Politesub53)

Profile

Post #: 81

RE: E Pluribus Unum - 1/24/2010 2:39:08 PM

AnimusRex

Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Butch, sorry for the delay. Here are the figures of what Britain owed, and was owed in return, after WWI

Ahh, but aren't you leaving out a few things?
Specifically, the claims that Henry V had on French territory, and subsequent fungibility to assert claim to parts of King Louis' XIV claim on the middle parts of America; The purchase of the Louisiana territory should have included repayment to Britain.
This also must be balanced against the claims made by Britain against the Roman Emperor Hadrian, which passed in chain of succession to present day Italy. However Italian debt was rightfully inherited by King Oadacer in AD 476 when he inherited the Western Empire from Emperor Augustulus.
And of course, in Central America the descendents of Montezuma are looking around wondering where their tons of gold disappeared to. Not to mention the claim that Russia has over the Pacific Northwest, and the claim that Mexico has over the American Southwest.

Another option, is to invoke Henry Ford's dictum that history is bunk, and get on with our fucking lives.

(in reply to Politesub53)

Profile

Post #: 82

RE: E Pluribus Unum - 1/24/2010 5:10:45 PM

Politesub53

Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

look pal; when I tell you that I will give you the source if and when I run across it and a mere couple posts later I in fact did give you the name of the source (long before you posted this nonsense), and you have the gall to accuse me of being anything but straight up with you about it makes you a fraud.

Failing to correct your error after you made the accusations and I pointed it out to you makes you a liar.

get it

Its not about me being a liar or having any gall, its about you providing proof, which you havent done yet.

I looked for the book you mentioned and only found this. Since anything before 1491 must have been way before Franklin, King George et al, I didnt consider it relevant. The synopsis provided points to the book being about events "before 1491".

Please dont tell me you would by this on my say so, with regards to Circa 1780.

http://www.amazon.com/1491-Revelations-Americas-Before-Columbus/dp/1400032059

edited to fix quote

< Message edited by Politesub53 -- 1/24/2010 5:12:39 PM >

(in reply to Real0ne)

Profile

Post #: 83