DemonKia
Posts: 5521
Joined: 10/13/2007 From: Chico, Nor-Cali Status: offline
|
I skipped reading thru the thread, sorry if'n I'm a bein' redundant here . .. . It depends on the moral system to which you 'subscribe'. I'm a buddhist. Buddhists subscribe to ahimsa, the doctrine of avoiding causing harm. Thus, Buddhist doctrines suggest that the more moral path is to avoid causing suffering via killing animals for food. I lower-case the 'buddhist' in describing myself because I am unorthodox & non-doctrinaire in my practice, & when it comes to meat-eating I'm a naughty, sinful, bad buddhist (no biscuit, lol) . . . . Luckily, Buddhism is a fairly broad & accomodating philosophy & doesn't really do the whole 'hell & shaming' thing that the followers of the book do so much of . . . . . In fact, I was counseled at one point by a vegetarian, when I was despairing of my ability to thrive on a vegetarian diet, that not everyone is meant to be a vegetarian. Bodies vary & some people do better eating meat than not .. . . Her wisdom & calm acceptance really helped me get past this whole meat-eaters-versus-veg-heads thing . .. . .. There are evangelicals of all kinds out there. I've found that it's my interior beliefs, attitudes, & expectations that correlate most strongly to whether an evangelical has an effect on me . . . . . . For instance, Christians have all kinds of beliefs about what is moral that I'm at variance with, but evangelical Christians proselytizing at me have never gotten me wondering if I'm moral or not. I got very clear on how 'not a Christian' I am during my adolescence & I've never looked back. So they can natter on & on at me & at most I'll be bored or amused or something along those lines . . . . .
_____________________________
Snarko ergo sum. The Verbossinator
|