CalifChick
Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007 From: California Status: offline
|
In a word, yes. In more words, my objection is to what appears to be a pattern of deliberately wording things in a way as to cause strife. Perhaps it creates a more entertaining discussion for some people. Personally, I would prefer a more honest discussion of the topic. Why do some people think that kinksters are more "anything" than non-kinksters. More loyal, more trustworthy, more dependable, whatever. Do you consciously or subconsciously hold kinksters to a higher standard than non-kinsters. Have you always felt this way, or is this something from fictional novels and/or online. Do you find that people start off with this pedestal-view and then it dissolves as they obtain more real-life experience and meet/interact with more people in the flesh. If you had this view and no longer do, what happened to make it change for you. Was it one dom who crossed a line, was it witnessing someone fabricating lies in your local group, was it taking a stand and saying that while you're happy to host a party at your home, the convicted-child-molestor-felon is not welcome in your home, and if that's a dealbreaker, the party will have to be somewhere else. I prefer that sort of honest discussion versus one where the biased premise of the question is under fire. Cali
_____________________________
AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll
|