Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Classification--- common sense?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Classification--- common sense? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/30/2010 6:51:27 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pyroaquatic

It was not so much... the nastiness...

more of how intellectually well put together it was.

STEAMY! = PYROAQUA(TIC)



Awwww!  Thanks!  *blush*

If you want to put it in the Masculinalization thread, please feel free to if you think that it would help anyone out. 

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to pyroaquatic)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/30/2010 8:07:46 PM   
MargueriteV


Posts: 75
Joined: 11/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hawkmoonelric

I just performed a Search for submissive females who are seeking Dominant Men in the Washington DC area.

It was amusing to see someone pop up who stridently protests that she is owned.
Her blog post of 5/30 whines that she's tired of men not getting it, she protests that her
profile clearly states that she is "owned", and that she is NOT available.

Now, I'm not defending anyone for ignoring or disrespecting her status. On the contrary.

But, if you fail to correctly set your profile parameters, the only person you can blame is yourself for the bad search results at the other end.



I agree that searching for people wold be easier if everyone kept their profile and their actively seeking list up to date. People can forget to change one, the other or both, and that is understandable because people have lives outside of this site.

Other notes:
Did you tell this woman that her profile shows up as actively seeking a master?

It is a bit odd that you read so much of her journal after learning she was a no go.

I will agree that it is sorta funny that she hasn't gone over her profile again when she seems to be getting mail from  a lot of guys.


(in reply to hawkmoonelric)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/30/2010 10:02:49 PM   
S1L1


Posts: 91
Joined: 5/31/2009
From: Upstate South Carolina
Status: offline 		Heck, I am seeing profiles that are 3 years old, the "Distance" option does not seem to work, etc. etc.

Yes it would be nice if ppl updated those things - but people are lazy - and others might ignore the status anyways.

Face it, the site is free - at least I don't get a "Sign up today" pop-up box each time I try to look at someones profile unlike some other sites out there that are pretty much useless unless you pay...

< Message edited by S1L1 -- 1/30/2010 10:03:42 PM >

(in reply to MargueriteV)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/31/2010 10:11:52 AM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

Oh I forgot to mention the email from Jefff to me saying that he's had a change of heart and finally wants to submit to me and kiss my feet ... ;-)

He sent that one to me twice yesterday, don't believe it.

~stef


_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/31/2010 10:15:00 AM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

Pyro has a point, though-just because it was justified doesn't mean it can't make people go a little hazy round the edges...



Do you mean angry or turned on?

Because I just do not see that as sexual at all, but whatever floats someone's boat, ya know. 

And I want a pic of you!  Everyone has been talking about how hawt you are. 


I meant turned on-apparently sometimes assertiveness gets people all hot and bothered-would you believe it?








Hey VC..I agree you are hot and smart, lethal combo.

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/31/2010 10:53:07 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1
Hey VC..I agree you are hot and smart, lethal combo.


D'aaaw, thankyou-you guys are too sweet

Maybe we should start a Hot Smart Kinkster Club...


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/31/2010 10:54:03 AM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline 		Ok, I will join, what should our outfits look like?

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/31/2010 10:56:56 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline 		Who says we need outfits? I say lingerie, and maybe a pair of well-fitting jeans...

Or maybe we should invite Lady A, and then just all have pictures of our legs. Except hers are better than mine :-(


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/31/2010 10:59:03 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

Who says we need outfits? I say lingerie, and maybe a pair of well-fitting jeans...

Or maybe we should invite Lady A, and then just all have pictures of our legs. Except hers are better than mine :-(



Oooh... Lingerie!! And lots of silk scarves too...

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Classification--- common sense? - 1/31/2010 11:37:01 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika
Oooh... Lingerie!! And lots of silk scarves too...
- LA


Definitely with the silk scarves :D


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Classification--- common sense? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.055