quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

here is another one of my fav pics.

on the side the plane went in where obviously it could not have richocheted backward you can clearly see that section was blow out, as in outward.

Now if that was world of war craft and there were point there then they would find it no problemo!

wtc today is truly a no brainer.

It was a demo and there is not to much to argue about except maybe for the sake of creating an argument.



[image]local://upfiles/59055/22ADAF7073614F6A9F3AF7C3E4CD2D11.jpg[/image]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3
As the plane hit the impact had both a vertical and horizontal component. What you see is the cladding unit behaving as it wasn't designed to do and buckling under the downward component of the impact, much like a column would do.

There was no plane.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3
Besides which I distinctly recall the planes exploding on impact, so even if there were some 'blow out' it could be attributed to that also.

[:-]You were an eye- and ear-witness? You were standing below one of the towers?

If you answer to those questions in the affirmative, then I must conclude that you are a liar: because there were no planes.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
I watched the second (obviously imaginary) plane hit from across the river

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
I ... watched as 215 of my colleagues were killed in the collapse of the first tower.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Very few of your photos are clear, yet you and Rule claim to know exactly what is going on. Dont tell me we now have two "Supergeniuses" on the boards. One is more than enough.

RealOne is not a supergenius. He is a genuine submissive and so impressive in his own right and he may be a genius for all I know.

His focus is on the architectural aspects, whereas mine was on the planes and on the people. I am obliged to lots of other people who published their findings and ideas on the internet.

I have no background in architecture and demolition and do not feel myself qualified to say much about that aspect, but I did gather sufficient information to conclude that the towers were brought down by thermate demolition and I know the name of the guy who made the demolition plan.

I do think that RealOne has posted a number of interesting photographs.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Well guess what, neither of you are a supergenius.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
You, on the other hand, claim you know everything about the planes and the passengers. Yet over the years you havent posted one link backing up your story.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Very few of your photos are clear, yet you and Rule claim to know exactly what is going on. Dont tell me we now have two "Supergeniuses" on the boards. One is more than enough.

RealOne is not a supergenius. He is a genuine submissive and so impressive in his own right and he may be a genius for all I know.

His focus is on the architectural aspects, whereas mine was on the planes and on the people. I am obliged to lots of other people who published their findings and ideas on the internet.

I have no background in architecture and demolition and do not feel myself qualified to say much about that aspect, but I did gather sufficient information to conclude that the towers were brought down by thermate demolition and I know the name of the guy who made the demolition plan.

I do think that RealOne has posted a number of interesting photographs.

Well guess what, neither of you are a supergenius.

He claims not to understand my post. The one that points out that in post 69 and 96 the picture of the hole has moved from one side of the building to the other.

You, on the other hand, claim you know everything about the planes and the passengers. Yet over the years you havent posted one link backing up your story.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

The Romans PUSHED  Humpy Dumpty off of Hadrian's wall.

They then covered it up.


Jeff

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

dood this is not in your video so wtf are you talking about?

http://www.collarchat.com/forceddownload.asp?file=0%3B3041883

and I was not talking about it in reference to YOUR video so why are you talking about?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
I watched the second (obviously imaginary) plane hit from across the river

A genuine eye-witness! Pray tell everything about what happened to you, what you were doing and what and how you observed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
I ... watched as 215 of my colleagues were killed in the collapse of the first tower.

I am sorry for your bereavement. So how come that you happened to be across the river?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

You are confusing entrance and exit holes, Politesub53.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
I watched the second (obviously imaginary) plane hit from across the river

A genuine eye-witness! Pray tell everything about what happened to you, what you were doing and what and how you observed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
I ... watched as 215 of my colleagues were killed in the collapse of the first tower.

I am sorry for your bereavement. So how come that you happened to be across the river?

Uhhh....I worked there. I observed everything that was shown on TV and that trooofers claim are somehow faked. Tens of thousands of people watched it from nearby. Im sure we are all hypnotized or part of the conspiracy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
What I want to know is how much of the deficit from the Bush Administration was due to paying the thousands of people who were looking at the WTC when they were hit to say they saw planes hit the buildings?