Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/6/2010 9:17:06 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

They need to stay vigilant, that’s all I know, and you can’t trust anybody these days. I don’t understand why people want all these weapons if they‘re never going to use them, so they say. I can’t be bothered having a gun if you can call the cops and they are over at your house in 3 minutes.

And if they want to play soldier they should join the army and go to Afghanistan.


On your first point, you're absolutely right. When your life expectancy is measured in seconds, the police are only minutes away.
On your second point, many of us have already done our service. We don't play. You're welcome.

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 2:38:23 AM   
Brain


Posts: 3792
Joined: 2/14/2007
Status: offline
I’m not so sure about that. These birthers are also racist. They can’t stand it that a black man is now president. Why do you think the whole birther idea started in the first place?

About Biden, why, what’s the difference between Biden and Obama?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus

Nobody is going to assassinate PrezBo, Brain. The last thing anyone wants is this guy to become a martyr. The next to the last thing anyone wants is for Biden to be president.



(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 3:09:49 AM   
Brain


Posts: 3792
Joined: 2/14/2007
Status: offline
Not true.


Crime in Canada and in the United States: a comparative analysis | Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, The | Find Articles at BNET

While crime has been a big political issue in the U.S. in the last thirty years, there is a sense that crime is becoming more important on Canada's political agenda. Public pressure for stricter gun laws, young offender laws and anti-gang laws shows that Canadians are .increasingly preoccupied with personal safety. Canada's crime situation is often assessed in comparison with the U.S. crime problem. However, the interpretation of the difference between the two countries depends heavily on the analytical design that is being used, on the indicators that are selected. This article examines the prevalence of four selected crimes between the two countries and introduces controls for regional variations and city size. Its aim is to provide a detailed interpretation of the difference between the two countries. In essence, no explanation of the difference in crime between Canada and the United Stares can be adequately tested if the problem itself is misspecified.

In the past three decades, a number of studies have compared the prevalence of crime between the United States and Canada. In most cases, it was found that crime was more frequent in the U.S., and non-specific explanations were offered (i.e., culture, laws, national character, among others). However, a review of studies shows that much emphasis has been given to homicide, which represents a very infrequent type of crime, and for which the U.S. situation can be explained by very specific or peculiar factors. Determinants of the homicide rate are quite different from those of burglary, car theft and robbery. In 1997 Zimring and Hawkins, two influential criminologists, published Crime Is Not the Problem, which shows that the major difference between the U. S. and Canada is the level of lethal violence. Using victimization surveys, they argue that the level of crime in the two countries is similar but that there are more homicides in the U.S. because guns are more prevalent.


Numerous international comparisons of crime have been conducted in the fields of criminology and sociology. However, they are confronted with a number of problems, especially as concerns the availability and validity of empirical data. Before undertaking an international comparison of the incidence of crime, we must first make sure that crime indicators are comparable. Homicide, robbery, burglary and car theft are the crimes most commonly used for comparison. These offences are better indicators of criminal activity than others (such as sexual or physical assault) since a large fraction of the crimes committed are known to police (Cusson, 1990) and because the differences in legal definitions across countries are less important than for other forms of crimes (such as fraud or drinking and driving).



The dark figure of crime (i.e., the proportion of crimes that are not reported to authorities) does not represent a major problem for comparison since it might be assumed that the rate of reportability is fairly constant across countries. Even if data on this subject for the U.S. and Canada are only scattered, there are no a priori reasons to think that differences in the two countries' residents in their propensity of reporting their victimization to the police would be a major factor in explaining differences in crime rates. Hindelang (1974) has shown that, in police data and victimization survey results, "the two sources of data lead to rather similar conclusions about areas of the country (Northeast, North Central, South or West) and places (urban, suburban, or rural). . ." (14). In a cross-national victimization survey, van Dijk, Mayhew and Killias (1990) report that there is little difference between Canadians and Americans on the percentage of victims reporting their crime to the police for burglary (respectively 80.6% vs. 78.9%) and robbery (56.5% vs. 59.5%). However, Americans were more likely to report car thefts than Canadians (97.6% vs. 82.4%).



Major Explanations of the Crime Gap between Canada and the U.S.



Early comparisons of crime rates in U. S. and Canada have shown that they were higher south of the border than north (Clark, 1976). Lipset (1990) showed how the way in which the countries developed their West had an impact on crime: in the U.S., settlers arrived before the police; settlers in Canada arrived after the Mounties. At this time in history, American settlers were populists and were not particularly inclined to submit to any form of central power. In contrast, Canadians wanted to follow British traditions and were anti-revolutionary. If those differences may have had something to do with crime in the 19th century, they are implausible explanations of differences between the two countries at the end of the 20th century (Baer, Grabb and Johnston, 1990).



Seymour Martin Lipset has analysed observable differences between the American and Canadian crime rates as part of a larger comparison of the two countries. In Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions in the United States and Canada (1990), the author explains why homicide, political protest and drug use are more frequent south of the border than north of it. Lipset argues that the greater prevalence of violence and deviance in the U. S. might be explained by the fact that Americans are more individualistic than Canadians. In consequence, Americans do not like to see the State in their personal business. Most Canadians, however, are willing to sacrifice part of their liberty for the good of the community. Therefore, Canadians generally favour stiff restrictions in matters of gun possession, agree with the prohibition of smoking in public places, and do not mind a strict drinking and driving enforcement.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go2771/is_3_36/ai_n28736318/



quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

I don’t think people having guns as a deterrent works. If you want to reduce crimes get rid of guns like England or Canada and see the amount of violence and crime go down.


Their violent crime rates are way, way up; rates for some crimes are worse in Canada than here. Even.


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 3:23:30 AM   
Brain


Posts: 3792
Joined: 2/14/2007
Status: offline
Sure. You only asked for some evidence but there are 14 web pages; here is some of it. I wish they had it all on one page.
Here is your evidence. Please get rid of the hand guns at least and stop the killing.

Crime in Canada and in the United States: a comparative analysis | Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, The | Find Articles at BNET

While crime has been a big political issue in the U.S. in the last thirty years, there is a sense that crime is becoming more important on Canada's political agenda. Public pressure for stricter gun laws, young offender laws and anti-gang laws shows that Canadians are .increasingly preoccupied with personal safety. Canada's crime situation is often assessed in comparison with the U.S. crime problem. However, the interpretation of the difference between the two countries depends heavily on the analytical design that is being used, on the indicators that are selected. This article examines the prevalence of four selected crimes between the two countries and introduces controls for regional variations and city size. Its aim is to provide a detailed interpretation of the difference between the two countries. In essence, no explanation of the difference in crime between Canada and the United Stares can be adequately tested if the problem itself is misspecified.

In the past three decades, a number of studies have compared the prevalence of crime between the United States and Canada. In most cases, it was found that crime was more frequent in the U.S., and non-specific explanations were offered (i.e., culture, laws, national character, among others). However, a review of studies shows that much emphasis has been given to homicide, which represents a very infrequent type of crime, and for which the U.S. situation can be explained by very specific or peculiar factors. Determinants of the homicide rate are quite different from those of burglary, car theft and robbery. In 1997 Zimring and Hawkins, two influential criminologists, published Crime Is Not the Problem, which shows that the major difference between the U. S. and Canada is the level of lethal violence. Using victimization surveys, they argue that the level of crime in the two countries is similar but that there are more homicides in the U.S. because guns are more prevalent.

Numerous international comparisons of crime have been conducted in the fields of criminology and sociology. However, they are confronted with a number of problems, especially as concerns the availability and validity of empirical data. Before undertaking an international comparison of the incidence of crime, we must first make sure that crime indicators are comparable. Homicide, robbery, burglary and car theft are the crimes most commonly used for comparison. These offences are better indicators of criminal activity than others (such as sexual or physical assault) since a large fraction of the crimes committed are known to police (Cusson, 1990) and because the differences in legal definitions across countries are less important than for other forms of crimes (such as fraud or drinking and driving).

The dark figure of crime (i.e., the proportion of crimes that are not reported to authorities) does not represent a major problem for comparison since it might be assumed that the rate of reportability is fairly constant across countries. Even if data on this subject for the U.S. and Canada are only scattered, there are no a priori reasons to think that differences in the two countries' residents in their propensity of reporting their victimization to the police would be a major factor in explaining differences in crime rates. Hindelang (1974) has shown that, in police data and victimization survey results, "the two sources of data lead to rather similar conclusions about areas of the country (Northeast, North Central, South or West) and places (urban, suburban, or rural). . ." (14). In a cross-national victimization survey, van Dijk, Mayhew and Killias (1990) report that there is little difference between Canadians and Americans on the percentage of victims reporting their crime to the police for burglary (respectively 80.6% vs. 78.9%) and robbery (56.5% vs. 59.5%). However, Americans were more likely to report car thefts than Canadians (97.6% vs. 82.4%).



Major Explanations of the Crime Gap between Canada and the U.S.

Early comparisons of crime rates in U. S. and Canada have shown that they were higher south of the border than north (Clark, 1976). Lipset (1990) showed how the way in which the countries developed their West had an impact on crime: in the U.S., settlers arrived before the police; settlers in Canada arrived after the Mounties. At this time in history, American settlers were populists and were not particularly inclined to submit to any form of central power. In contrast, Canadians wanted to follow British traditions and were anti-revolutionary. If those differences may have had something to do with crime in the 19th century, they are implausible explanations of differences between the two countries at the end of the 20th century (Baer, Grabb and Johnston, 1990).

Seymour Martin Lipset has analysed observable differences between the American and Canadian crime rates as part of a larger comparison of the two countries. In Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions in the United States and Canada (1990), the author explains why homicide, political protest and drug use are more frequent south of the border than north of it. Lipset argues that the greater prevalence of violence and deviance in the U. S. might be explained by the fact that Americans are more individualistic than Canadians. In consequence, Americans do not like to see the State in their personal business. Most Canadians, however, are willing to sacrifice part of their liberty for the good of the community. Therefore, Canadians generally favour stiff restrictions in matters of gun possession, agree with the prohibition of smoking in public places, and do not mind a strict drinking and driving enforcement.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go2771/is_3_36/ai_n28736318/




quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

I don’t think people having guns as a deterrent works. If you want to reduce crimes get rid of guns like England or Canada and see the amount of violence and crime go down.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

Evidence that angry Americans are arming themselves for violence is hard to ignore.



Please forgive me for the intrusion, but why do you suppose folks are arming themselves for violence? Particularly, the inference that it is violence against the powers that be? Please correct me if I am misunderstanding this point.

I think that it is barely possible the upturn in the numbers of folks arming themselves nowadays may very well have to do with being a deterrent to crime. After all, criminals in general, flourish where there are plenty of helpless victims. 

I'm strictly guessing here, but a recent FBI release indicates that violent crime is down, during the same time those nasty gun sales were on the increase, which may not be completely coincidental. I personally think it is not a coincidence.

http://www.fbi.gov/page2/dec09/crimestats_122109.html





Could you please provide me with some evidence that crime went down in these particular countries that you've mentioned. As I understand it, it's actually quite the complete opposite. I'm very curious to learn if it is actually not what it is painted to be by some of the main stream media. As the years have gone by, it seems to me to be harder and harder to find news sources that are trustworthy and reliable and not merely spouting off a bunch of bs to fit whatever agenda. Unfortunate that we each must sort through an inordinate amount of chaff in order to find what we can believe is the truth.

However, just trying to think logically, I'm wondering if it makes any sense that a criminal, if given the choice, would rather perpetrate their crimes upon those who they would guess to have a defensive weapon readily available, or someone they would guess to be unarmed?



(in reply to MrMister)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 4:46:11 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

Evidence that angry Americans are arming themselves for violence is hard to ignore.



Please forgive me for the intrusion, but why do you suppose folks are arming themselves for violence? Particularly, the inference that it is violence against the powers that be? Please correct me if I am misunderstanding this point.

I think that it is barely possible the upturn in the numbers of folks arming themselves nowadays may very well have to do with being a deterrent to crime. After all, criminals in general, flourish where there are plenty of helpless victims. 

I'm strictly guessing here, but a recent FBI release indicates that violent crime is down, during the same time those nasty gun sales were on the increase, which may not be completely coincidental. I personally think it is not a coincidence.

http://www.fbi.gov/page2/dec09/crimestats_122109.html


Then you know nothing of demographics. Gun ownership is never a deterent to crime.

Whenever crime goes down, teh first stat to check is whether the percentage of the population that is 15 to 25 years old and male is declining. Since that group commits most crimes when it declines crime goes down.

Want to be which direction that cohort is trending?


In all due respect, if you read my post again, you should be able to find where I said it was "barely possible".Which I would venture a guess that most would infer from that statement that what I said was my opinion and such was indeed barely possible. Not sure why you feel obligated to quickly dismiss that?

You made a claim that is well known to be wrong but that is frequently peddled. You tried to sneak it in with your weasel worded addition. I simply pointed out that there is no evidence to support your claim and there is another very well known circumstance to examine before looking elsewhere for crime trends.

If you don't like reality impinging on your fantasies then don't post them on public forums.



He also made a statement which you totally ignored, something you do quite often to attack both a postion and a person - that being, why many people may be arming themselves.

Now hustle off to your bag of statistics and find me one that says people forego buying weapons when they feel threatened. I'm sure you can find one as I'm sure some leftist out there twisted enough numbers to make it so.

As far as crime deterrent goes, I dunno about statistics, so I'll have to rely on personal experience. The man I shot when I was 13 who was trying to enter our house, never came back.

Seemed a decent deterrent in his future.

_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 4:49:16 AM   
MrMister


Posts: 272
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

Sure. You only asked for some evidence but there are 14 web pages; here is some of it. I wish they had it all on one page.
Here is your evidence. Please get rid of the hand guns at least and stop the killing.



Thanks for the posting Brain. In all honesty, when I asked for some evidence, I was mostly wondering if you had anything disproving the alleged higher violent crime rates in England, as I'm having difficulty finding an article I've previously read.

Anyway, I'm of the school of thought that if the day comes when honest, law-abiding citizens are disarmed, then only the criminals will be armed. After all, I don't really think any one of us here believe most criminals are going to give two squirts of piss on a fat rats ass whether or not they are in compliance of any law. Just my 2 cents.

< Message edited by MrMister -- 2/7/2010 5:02:07 AM >

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 5:14:13 AM   
DomImus


Posts: 2004
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus
The last thing anyone wants is this guy to become a martyr. The next to the last thing anyone wants is for Biden to be president.


God forbid, aye?!!! Let's not make a new Kennedy! And also, of course, because if the VP was someone more acceptable to the lunatic right, then of course, it would be worth assassinating the president  .

And you wonder why those on the other side of the political aisle from you carry the moral high ground.


Did I say that? Don't preach to me about your precious moral compass when you twist people's statements around like this.


_____________________________

"Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable." Sidney J. harris

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 5:19:06 AM   
DomImus


Posts: 2004
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain
I’m not so sure about that. These birthers are also racist. They can’t stand it that a black man is now president. Why do you think the whole birther idea started in the first place?

About Biden, why, what’s the difference between Biden and Obama?


Thank you for your input, Jimmy. I don't buy the whole birther issue myself but if they were correct then he would be ineligible for president, no? I realize that the Constitution is more often an obstacle to your argument than a it is a support but...

On the second item - you got me there, Brain. They're both bad news for the country.


_____________________________

"Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable." Sidney J. harris

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 6:02:43 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain
About Biden, why, what’s the difference between Biden and Obama?

Biden wasn't born in Kenys.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 9:14:51 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
FR

Not to be so bold as to get to the original point......

The actual ranks of the unorganized militia haven't grown all that much, they are just becoming more active. They layed low for a time after that nutcase farmboy Timmy gave them a black eye over in OKC. They see this as a good time to get more active, the politcal climate is much more favorable now, and I agree.

I predict we will see more of the unorganized militia in the future. There are several reasons for this. First of all with a democrat in office, more of a threat is percieved, which will impel them to spread the word so as to increase their numbers. Whether true or not, they see democrats as gun grabbers. What's more the imminent collapse of the system is alot easier to sell now, for obvious reasons. Even if the new recruits have no notion of taking up arms against the government (which is the true intent of the second inclusive), they will percieve a threat of increased crime due to the coming recession.

Coming you say ? That from someone who says it's already here ? Yes it is already here, but it has not run it's course.

They stress the importance of one's right and responsibility for their own defense, and the ability to survive amidst a total breakdown. Being able to live "off the grid" is becoming more alluring as the dollar plummets and the government finds more and more enemies.

While there are a few nutcases, generally these people are within their rights. Paramilitary and survival training are assets, and more people are going to see that. The only problem I have with them is that they are a bit too religious.

Oh, and to the tangental argument about guns deterring crime, I've one thing to say : Please don't try to rob me because I just got new carpeting. If it were just the bloodstain I would just get the jumbo size drum of hydrogen peroxide, but it's also a matter of making a nice tote bag for your carcass afterward. Well, at least the tackless is in good shape.

T

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 8:45:37 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
Those guys and the ones with beards in Montana who print their own money aren't the "Militia."
They may be a diversion to keep law enforcement off guard and busy.


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 8:53:05 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Those guys and the ones with beards in Montana who print their own money aren't the "Militia."
They may be a diversion to keep law enforcement off guard and busy.



I had to laugh, newt gingrich said "if you wanna know about law you go an talk to those boys out west!"

while they arent 100%, no one can be, they are damn good :)


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 10:07:05 PM   
EbonyWood


Posts: 2044
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

I think the mafia killed John Kennedy and I don't remember why that moron killed Robert. The other 2, the guy who tried to kill Reagan and the guy who killed John Lennon, I forgot their names now, they were both nuts and I hope they never get out.


Bobby Kennedy ducked back into the kitchen at the Ambassador's and ate bad shrimp. He pointed at the nearest wop waiter, Sirhan Sirhan, as he went down. The Secret Service were on him like white on rice as he tried to tell them it wasn't even his table. This distraction allowed Ethel Kennedy to kneel on Bobby's chest and pump a few rounds into him, allowing her hot lesbian affair with Rosemary Clooney to continue.
 
John Hinkley had just seen Bonzo Goes to College and was furious that it lacked the presence of Reagan and the comedic moralising of Bedtime for Bonzo. The Taxi Driver connection is a myth, and Hinkley was actually obsessed with White House Press Secretary James Brady, a much better actress than Jodie Foster. The absence of one George Herbert Walker Bush reamains suspicious to this day.
 
Yoko Ono clubbed Lennon to death from behind as they entered the Dakota because Double Fantasy was such a lousy album with poor production values. It was only going to sell posthumously. Mark Chapman was an innocent autograph seeker who had just borrowed Catcher In The Rye from a condescending liberal librarian who set him up to take the fall. He gets a monthly check from one Paul McCartney to this day.

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 10:10:22 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
Brain. remember one thing. He is only 'half black'. And we really don't care about his race anyway. We don't like the way he is running the country.

(in reply to EbonyWood)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 10:18:22 PM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood
Bobby Kennedy ducked back into the kitchen at the Ambassador's and ate bad shrimp. He pointed at the nearest wop waiter, Sirhan Sirhan, as he went down. The Secret Service were on him like white on rice as he tried to tell them it wasn't even his table. This distraction allowed Ethel Kennedy to kneel on Bobby's chest and pump a few rounds into him, allowing her hot lesbian affair with Rosemary Clooney to continue.
 
John Hinkley had just seen Bonzo Goes to College and was furious that it lacked the presence of Reagan and the comedic moralising of Bedtime for Bonzo. The Taxi Driver connection is a myth, and Hinkley was actually obsessed with White House Press Secretary James Brady, a much better actress than Jodie Foster. The absence of one George Herbert Walker Bush reamains suspicious to this day.
 
Yoko Ono clubbed Lennon to death from behind as they entered the Dakota because Double Fantasy was such a lousy album with poor production values. It was only going to sell posthumously. Mark Chapman was an innocent autograph seeker who had just borrowed Catcher In The Rye from a condescending liberal librarian who set him up to take the fall. He gets a monthly check from one Paul McCartney to this day.


I laughed for a few minutes, until I realized that a year from now we will be seeing this pop up on threads all over teh Intertubes. Complete with grainy pics circled in red with people saying cant you ppl see what iz right in front of your face????

Oy.

(in reply to EbonyWood)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 10:41:13 PM   
EbonyWood


Posts: 2044
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex


I laughed for a few minutes, until I realized that a year from now we will be seeing this pop up on threads all over teh Intertubes. Complete with grainy pics circled in red with people saying cant you ppl see what iz right in front of your face????

Oy.


Don't think it didn't cross my mind, AR. I just know there are a couple of small furry lunatics lurking around the corner taking notes and muttering "I knew it!"

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 10:49:41 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

When your life expectancy is measured in seconds, the police are only minutes away.


If I hear one more person repeat this stupid NRA propaganda quote I'm going to break out my AK-47 and go postal on this board.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 11:12:07 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

I think the mafia killed John Kennedy and I don't remember why that moron killed Robert. The other 2, the guy who tried to kill Reagan and the guy who killed John Lennon, I forgot their names now, they were both nuts and I hope they never get out.


Too late, he already pretty much is.


John Hinckley, Jr. - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

He was allowed to leave the hospital for supervised visits with his parents in 1999, and longer unsupervised releases in 2000.

These privileges were revoked when he was found to have smuggled materials about Foster back into the hospital. Hinckley was later allowed supervised visits in 2004 and 2005.

Court hearings were held in September 2005 on whether he could have expanded privileges to leave the hospital. Some of the testimony during the hearings centered on whether Hinckley is capable of having a normal relationship with a woman and, if not, whether that would have any bearing on what danger he would pose to society.

On December 30, 2005, a federal judge ruled that Hinckley would be allowed visits, supervised by his parents, to their home in Williamsburg
, Virginia. The judge ruled that Hinckley could have up to three visits of three nights and then four visits of four nights, each depending on the successful completion of the last. All of the experts who testified at Hinckley's 2005 conditional release hearing, including the government experts, agreed that his depression and psychotic disorder were in full remission and that he should have some expanded conditions of release.

After requesting further freedoms including two one-week visits with his parents as well as a month long visit, the U.S. District Judge, Paul L. Friedman, denied that request on Wednesday, June 6, 2007; he did not deny the request out of a concern that Hinckley was not ready.

“ The reasons the court has reached this decision rest with the hospital, not with Mr. Hinckley... the hospital has not taken the steps it must take before any such transition can begin."

On June 17, 2009, a Federal judge ruled that Hinckley would be given the ability to visit his mother for nine days at a time, rather than six, spend more time outside of the hospital, and even have a driver's license.





< Message edited by rulemylife -- 2/7/2010 11:16:37 PM >

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/7/2010 11:56:16 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Ebony, JFK was killed because he made certain threats to another country. Their covert people coopted some of our covert people to get it done, and in typical fashion a fall guy was chosen.

Robert had been warned, and he did what he was warned not to do. Whack.

Who actually pulled the trigger means nothing.

T

(in reply to EbonyWood)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias - 2/8/2010 1:26:58 AM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

When your life expectancy is measured in seconds, the police are only minutes away.


If I hear one more person repeat this stupid NRA propaganda quote I'm going to break out my AK-47 and go postal on this board.



If you do that, I'm going to call the police. And insist that you sit down and wait for them to arrive. I mean it - I'm going to insist!


But seriously, do you really find fault with it? It sounds like a pretty valid argument to me. I don't see the problem with it.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Resurgent Right-Wing Militias Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109