Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: An Experiment


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: An Experiment Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 3:29:15 AM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally

People get twitchy about honesty regardless, I don't think its a BDSM specific thing, though this site specifically is one of the most dramatic BDSM sites I use, so it may be to do with that. Anyways I don't really want to get into all that stuff.

My point fundementally is that I could say now that I did the same experiment but only half replied to me, there would be no way to judge the validity of my claim just as there is no way to judge the OP's the post is redundant because who knows what she wrote, the advice she is giving is no different to advice without the experiment aspect. It isn't helpful to anyone. Also if half replied to me, surely the number of posts sent out would make a difference? Also loads of subjective factors such as who she sent messages to etc etc it all means that whether the OP agrees or not it was a waste of time and energy. It won't help men on this website more than a general 'how to write emails' post would.


In the end, the thread did not turn out to be very helpful. I tend to think/believe she was prepared to share more indepth details regarding what she had discovered. Why else would she start a thread? She suspected it was not going to make her a popular person, and risked that for a reason. At times, one can start a thread with the best of intentions at hand and it's the users which help shape the direction it goes in.

I'm certain she would have been happy to share more details as to the elements she put into these emails, or even on the profile. I'm certain she could have went into talking about what is or is not considered "warm" emails. All of which would have been contructive and positive tips.

Given the nature of under-cover exploration/experiences where that's an effective tool for gathering empathy and understanding. She merely was attempting to put herself in the same foot steps as guys.

Sure it's one thing to sit and talk about it, another thing to sincerely experience it. In many regards much of what is bantered around on the message boards is conjecture, idealisms and notions.

She did learn something through the experince, also she learned a few unexpected things through starting up a thread. There are good number of people that simply read the message boards without posting at all. Some of these people refrain from doing so to avoid the drama or publically disclosing things.

None the less, it's the users that can make or break a thread topic. People make choices and decisons in regards to what to post. People make decisions about rushing to judgement or to think about things and find understanding.

I'm not active on any other BDSM message boards beside this one, so it's a little hard for me to fully guage things across the board. I seem to have a love/hate relationship for CM and will continue to do so.

I know that I myself am and can be rather sarcastic and snarky at times. I myself have also been the target to sarcastic and snarkyisms as well. I do love and enjoy entering into debates though. There have been a few users that have stopped me in my tracks and made me think. Enough so, that I retracted or changed my opinion or view on the matter. However, they were not attacking me or the thing I was saying for mere pleasure or enjoyment.

Still none the less, it's what other people bring to a given topic that makes or breaks it. In all honestly this thread failed the goals or objectives that were mind when it was created by the OP.

I do feel or think that there is value contained within the thread itself for the OP and other users and people that are simply reading the message boards.

(in reply to LillyoftheVally)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 3:34:55 AM   
LillyoftheVally


Posts: 1826
Joined: 7/22/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
I'm certain she would have been happy to share more details as to the elements she put into these emails, or even on the profile. I'm certain she could have went into talking about what is or is not considered "warm" emails. All of which would have been contructive and positive tips.

Given the nature of under-cover exploration/experiences where that's an effective tool for gathering empathy and understanding. She merely was attempting to put herself in the same foot steps as guys.

Sure it's one thing to sit and talk about it, another thing to sincerely experience it. In many regards much of what is bantered around on the message boards is conjecture, idealisms and notions.


Even with her disclosing those things we could never know what aspects affected her. There have been occasions when this type of study is helpful but often the covert nature of it detracts a LOT from the findings. I doubt that the OP sat and tried to eliminate her own personal attributes before starting out, I doubt she did a random sample and there is no control group so it STILL would have made her experiment irrelevant.

She was attempting to put herself in her shoes absolutely, and I am sure it was valuable for her in that regard but it is not at all useful for anyone other than her. As to what a warm email is, yes she could have done that but then she is a woman so she could have spoken about what gets her going without doing the experiment, we all manage to do that.

In these types of threads people still say that they dont reply to all emails even if the emails are lovely, if they dont match they dont reply, so the one hundred percent rate she claims does nothing but make people who aren't getting that feel they are doing something wrong which may not be the case.


_____________________________

'My doctor says that I have a malformed public-duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre, and that I am therefore excused from saving Universes.'

Nah I am not happy to see you either

(in reply to Whiplashsmile4)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 3:38:09 AM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

FR

There are 2 other people on this thead who have admitted setting up fake profiles and messaging people. Why has nobody taken them to task for their dishonesty?



My thoughts are such, that the OP expressed that what she did was wrong. Now, I sincerely, hate to express this, but at times other people will take advantage of other people's guilt or shame, push them over the edge with Guilt trips. To the point the other person snaps and becomes angry and then say's or does something they will regret later with even greater Guilt. Call it a vicious cycle of Guilt/Shame.

Concept is simple. Somebody commits a small offense, and they admit it was wrong. They are demonized or otherwise experience a great deal of guilt tripping over it. They Break, and say some extremely aweful words. Then they end up feeling like an aweful person. In turn they Apologize again. Layers of Guilt become established over what? Some small offense?

This is just my theory upon the matter. It's a sort of control concept.

(in reply to susie)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 3:56:05 AM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally


quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
I'm certain she would have been happy to share more details as to the elements she put into these emails, or even on the profile. I'm certain she could have went into talking about what is or is not considered "warm" emails. All of which would have been contructive and positive tips.

Given the nature of under-cover exploration/experiences where that's an effective tool for gathering empathy and understanding. She merely was attempting to put herself in the same foot steps as guys.

Sure it's one thing to sit and talk about it, another thing to sincerely experience it. In many regards much of what is bantered around on the message boards is conjecture, idealisms and notions.


Even with her disclosing those things we could never know what aspects affected her. There have been occasions when this type of study is helpful but often the covert nature of it detracts a LOT from the findings. I doubt that the OP sat and tried to eliminate her own personal attributes before starting out, I doubt she did a random sample and there is no control group so it STILL would have made her experiment irrelevant.

She was attempting to put herself in her shoes absolutely, and I am sure it was valuable for her in that regard but it is not at all useful for anyone other than her. As to what a warm email is, yes she could have done that but then she is a woman so she could have spoken about what gets her going without doing the experiment, we all manage to do that.

In these types of threads people still say that they dont reply to all emails even if the emails are lovely, if they dont match they dont reply, so the one hundred percent rate she claims does nothing but make people who aren't getting that feel they are doing something wrong which may not be the case.



She's only been on the site for a little over a month. Keep in mind she has not been around long enough to see the topics come and go like we have. She also has minimal experience wih the lifestyle. It's only natural for her to explore things, share those experiences, to attempt to engage in learning and growing.

Would be like somebody learning how to use a figure 8 pattern with a flogger with an added safety tip about care to the kidney are. Where they are all excieted and making a post to the message boards to share it with the world. Mind you, I don't see a hell of a lot posted about Flogging Techniques at all on here. :-) and I sincerely wonder how many people that have played around with a flogger know what a figure 8 pattern, and question how many people actually know where the Kidneys are actually located on the body. (I'm just saying)

(in reply to LillyoftheVally)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 4:01:54 AM   
LillyoftheVally


Posts: 1826
Joined: 7/22/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
She's only been on the site for a little over a month. Keep in mind she has not been around long enough to see the topics come and go like we have. She also has minimal experience wih the lifestyle. It's only natural for her to explore things, share those experiences, to attempt to engage in learning and growing.


Yeah I get that, and I know a lot of people do little things like she has to help gather understanding, I am just saying that beyond that her experiment is no use. She did know this is what would happen to her thread she said so from the start so she can't be upset when it does happen. I was trying to knock the theory rather than the poster because she has been flamed enough imo

quote:


Would be like somebody learning how to use a figure 8 pattern with a flogger with an added safety tip about care to the kidney are. Where they are all excieted and making a post to the message boards to share it with the world. Mind you, I don't see a hell of a lot posted about Flogging Techniques at all on here. :-) and I sincerely wonder how many people that have played around with a flogger know what a figure 8 pattern, and question how many people actually know where the Kidneys are actually located on the body. (I'm just saying)



No, and often when safety stuff is bought up people start going on about safety police so its a loose loose situation really. This is turning very much into a state of the nation discussion.


< Message edited by LillyoftheVally -- 2/7/2010 4:02:22 AM >


_____________________________

'My doctor says that I have a malformed public-duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre, and that I am therefore excused from saving Universes.'

Nah I am not happy to see you either

(in reply to Whiplashsmile4)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 4:31:55 AM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
While I don't think that the OP necessarily was malicious in her intent, I'm not necessarily agreeing with the empathy aspect.  Truthfully, you don't have to look very far to see thread after thread dedicated to good advice on how to get a response around here or profile help.  All she did by her actions was prove to herself what most folks have been saying around here for years. If a thousand people have already said the same thing, is the thousandth and first person really contributing to 'the community'?



She's only been using the site for a little over a month, and is pretty new to the lifestyle. Also, it appears to matter very little how many times people have responded to the same old topics, because they keep springing back up to life more times than a Micheal Myers Holloween Sociopath.

LadyPact, some of us that have been around on this site for a long time... we have to face the fact, that our patience and armor for tolerence has become rather dented and dinged up. We cringe when we see certain BUZZ words in the heading of new topics, even before we read them.

Personally, If CM was my site. I'd set up an article section that covers a lot of the same old same old crappy questions that get asked or explored here. The Search Function of the Message Board just does'nt cut it.

There really is not an article or content section on this site, with exception of the message board. However, the message board exchanges contain a literal treasure trove of posts collected over the years. It also contains a lot of Trash, Meaningless crap, Banter and shit for somebody to sort out. Would be nice to see some well written articles published on a number of reoccuring nightmare threads that all lead to the same conclusions time and time again.

quote:


Let's remember that within this 'community', there are a number of male Dominants who frequent these boards who have said time and time again that they have a good success rate in contacting others.  They attribute this to very basic concepts.  They read profiles, comment on what is written within it, and ask questions based on common interest in order to encourage response.  It really isn't rocket science to figure this out or hear enough people say the same thing to understand that it works.  If that is too much for someone to comprehend, maybe they had better work more on their social and communication skills before thinking about taking on more complex skills, such as relationships.



In many regards, this is akin to Marketing skills as well. Choice of username (plays a role), Written Communication skills (personally, I have a much easier time with verbal interaction or real time interaction. I know that I'm at a huge disadvantage when it comes to writing an effective email to some girl for the first time). Hell, I myself don't have this Rocket Science worked out. (Dare I admit it).

quote:


I find it very odd that, within discussions where folks constantly sing the praises of honesty within communications, where we talk about integrity and trust, along comes a situation where someone comes along and specifically didn't take that road.   We're quick to condone that behavior.  Really?  When was the last time that you, out there, the reader, had someone lie to you and you were cool with it?



She came clean about things. She actually had the courage to do so publically which is a lot more than what can be said for many people. It take a degree of courage to do so. Also, it reflects upon her overall integrity (my opinion). Why is it, that me being a Male Dominant can confess to something well not so good and be complimented upon the strength it takes, yet a submissive women gets racked over the coals? To what gender or orientation does this measure of strength apply?

In terms of the last time somebody lied to me. LOL.. I actually had somebody that had been maintaining a lie about something for awhile, trust me I was the lawn mower and their ass was grass, however when they came clean with the Truth. I was cool about it. It's now a none issue and a thing of the past. It was a major issue too. Then again, I knew I was being hood winked too, I just did'nt know or understand what the truth was. So yeah, I had fired up the lawn mower and their ass was Grass for awhile. The Yard is all tidy now as it should be.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 4:41:40 AM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally
Yeah I get that, and I know a lot of people do little things like she has to help gather understanding, I am just saying that beyond that her experiment is no use. She did know this is what would happen to her thread she said so from the start so she can't be upset when it does happen. I was trying to knock the theory rather than the poster because she has been flamed enough imo


She had an idea it was not going to make her popular (very true)* but as they say no pain no gain. To be honest with you, anybody who starts up a thread should prepared for it go badly.

Also, I have started threads in the past believing I was going to get Flammed and literally put on fire and it did'nt happen. It's the threads where Iwas expecting it the least where it happened (Stunned me).

Yes.. she's been flammed and turned over and flammed some more. Flammed Fresh Grilled Subbie Meat hot off the BBQ. too bad it's not a 4th of july picnic... (looking outside at all the snow).

I'm passing on the "state of the nation" leave that to the professionals... I might endulge in watching "Meet the Press" this morning.

(in reply to LillyoftheVally)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 5:20:03 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4

I more less agree with your points, however man there sure are a lot of sexual raunchy females profiles that are just begging for the Sleezy humilation, sex and abuse in email. It's more like a competition for who is the biggest whore, slut and piece of fuck meat, no limits girl, that is looking for a True Dom to put them in their place and control everything about their pathetic lives.


Good point, well made. There are profiles out there where it seems clear that the person posting the profile (real or fake) is looking for nasty, sleazy email - so a half-smart Dom, who is into that kind of thing, would reflect for a moment and send an appropriate email, surely?

quote:




Anyways, every few weeks a guy makes a post to Message Board complaining, or looking for advice or help because they are not getting any responses from women in the emails they send or their profile. These guys are generally not the Rude & Vulgar ones sending out mindless trashy email either (at least not generally).


I wouldn't put these people into the "fuckwit" category - if they're smart enough to ask a genuine question, as you say they're generally not the ones sending out mindless, trashy, email.

I've responded constructively to a couple of posts of this kind.

quote:




So it gets to be somewhat confusing as to why these apparently decent guys are not getting a response. Believe it or not, even extremely well written profiles and emails don't get the response. Why? Because of something called personality or tone of the email. Some of these well written emails are in fact long winded and rather DULL DULL DULL. Does not snag the attention nor interest.

This is a very frustrating experience for guys that are sincere and are not being a Pig about things.


Sure! And this is essentially about marketing, and again - guys who put care and attention into their profiles, write thoughtful emails, and who are willing to ask for advice definitely don't fall into the category.

quote:


The Moron/Idiot wanker factor does not apply. No, it's not utterly fracking apparent to people even with IQ's above 32. In fact this concept applies to REAL WORLD dating, where there are nice guys that just can't seem to draw or attract interest from the opposite sex (they ain't bad looking guys either, and they have jobs).


I'm sorry, I think we're at a misunderstanding - It should absolutely, totally, utterly, unquestionably fracking apparent, to anyone but a total fuckwit that "they're going to get a better response with an appropriately written profile and a thoughtful email" as I wrote in my original reponse.

First - I say "better response" not guaranteed response. Second, I say "appropriately written profile" and third I say "thoughtful".

I don't say that every profile should describe X or Y or Z, nor do  say that a thoughtful email should be a mile long and contain the chaps entire lifestory. A thoughtful email could be one word long.

Take a Dom's profile that says "You are my slave and I will use you as my toilet"; this isn't necessarily wrong or innapropriate -  A sub advertising with "Humiliate me, degrade me, make me your slave and toilet" is likely to dig our notional Dom's profile. But if our notional dom then emails a second sub (whose profile might begin "Professional woman, iso genuine, witty, intelligent dom for occasional light kink" and who has "slavery" and "watersports" as hard limits) with "so you want to be a dirty piss slut then you ho" then I think we're all entitled to suspect a wee case of fuckwittery.




quote:


It's so nice that lump all these guys as being "Fuckwits" when some of them ain't at all. Not everybody is good nor feels comfortable when emailing a complete stranger for the first time. It's a bit like Fracking Stage Fright for some people and has very little to with IQ.

Nah, I'm sticking with this - I am totally happy saying that if you don't think you will get better response with an appropriately written profile and a thoughtful email then you're a fuckwit. Simple as.

quote:


You can sit and toss around insults and belittlements or you can attempt to reach for understanding. That's rather a personal choice or decision for you to make. Every time anybody makes a post to a thread, a decision is made. A choice is made regarding the response to give. A choice is made to look for or not look for understanding. A choice is made to attempt to enter into constructive Debate. A choice is made to toss out Humor and Snarky comments for Laughs.


With respect, you're doing a fair whack of judging here yourself.

quote:


I have to disagree with your simplist accessment about the IQ of 32, your comments about FuckWits and etc... because there really are some since guys that are not being PIGs and they are trying to put honest thought into what they are doing. They turn to the message looking for advice.


Indeed there are - and the fact that they're turning to the message boards looking for advice pops them outside my very clear definition of what makes a fuckwit.

quote:


Now with that said. If any guy came here to the message board looking for Advice on this subject, DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA who I might Refer them to? The OP of this very thread. Why? Because of their own Personal Experience and Insight gained by their hands on Exploration into the matter. Then again, Experience is Priceless.

Are the caps "shouting" or simply patronising?

I will say it again, I  think this experiment was somewhat nonsensical, because it should be obvious to anyone that you can expect a better response with an appropriately written profile and a thoughtful email

quote:


In my not so humble Opinion, you'd be the last person I'd point them to for advice, cause you just might end up calling them a FuckWit or something. I'd fear you'd be way too impatient with them as well. I tend to think that about people who cast out name calling and Judgements quickly. Then again... this is just my own personal impression and thoughts.


I made a general comment about people who are too stupid to grasp one of the most elementary components of communication, that you will get better response with an appropriately written profile and a thoughtful email. I didn't call anyone specific a name - Although I absolutely reserve the right to call someone a fuckwit if the need arises.

I am relatively patient as it happens, and if you had gone to the trouble of checking out a couple of my posts you'll see that I'm happy to provide constructive feeback from time to time -

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3028787/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3028943
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3019044/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3024294

So, with respect to your not so humble opinion - if you come up with someone who genuinely wants help tuning a profile, or getting into the scene (esp in London or the South of the UK) I'd be very happy to help - in as much as I can -  and will give you my personal promise not to call them a fuckwit.

If, however, you encounter someone who really doesn't understand why emails stating "You my ho, bitch" aren't getting a deluge of emails then please don't point them to me, because I wouldn't be able to stop myself from saying "If you don't see any problem with 'You my ho, bitch' then you're clearly a fuckwit and I can't help you.

I suspect we're not really in disagreement, I think you misunderstood my point (for which I am responsible in not making it properly), and then perhaps you judged a little quickly as a response?



(in reply to Whiplashsmile4)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 5:50:01 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968

*fast reply*
Wow. Poor OP. I can see people having an issue with what you did if you strung some of these women along with back and forth emails for a bit.
But.....you didn't.
If a single email and then a confessional reply email to a test subjects has such a negative, life altering effect on a person, then they have no business being part of an interactive adult world.
Some of you people are really making a huge deal and are taking what she did so personally. I wonder why.





Exactly Aileen. Let's be real, people, she sent ONE email. She didn't string them along for months and months, hell she didn't even string them along for a day. In the grand scheme of things if one email is that destructive, those women are just a wee bit too sensitive. I think a mountain has been made of a mole hill.

Lady A a few pages back you said that juju owes the community an apology, I for one don't need one. I honestly don't think she did anyone harm, least of all me.

zeph


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to Aileen1968)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 5:57:22 AM   
JBGolden


Posts: 75
Joined: 11/13/2009
Status: offline
Well, in my opinion it definitely should be common sense that well written responses would get better results. Do I believe this to always be the case however?

No. Because that's just what I do and I definitely can't tout a 100% response rate. So there's a couple of things I'm curious about. You say you put up an average looking guy's picture. What picture was it? What did you write in your profile? Did you only message people near you or also further away? Did all 40 people you messaged look at your profile before answering that first time? There's so many variables that goes into getting a response past just writing a good message that you might've just got lucky getting a response to all of those if it's like you said it is.

While I don't think the OP acted maliciously I can see why some people would frown on it. I do mainly because I read about somebody who wrote a fake profile, wrote 40 messages and got responses from all 40 when I put in the same effort and got nowhere that amount. It seems a bit braggy and rankling.

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 6:01:17 AM   
Phoenixpower


Posts: 8098
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Play time aside (which I think some folks are seeing this) you creative a profile, specifically so you could run your experiment.  You deceived people into thinking you were another person so that you would get the result you wished to obtain.  Not to mention using an approach that you knew was more likely to get a response, therefore, wasting their time.  On top of lying to them for this, you involved them non consensually in your project, which you did not disclose to them until after you deceived them and got your result.

It would be My opinion that you honestly owe some folks an apology.



but...yanno....with me having my research exam tomorrow (never had such boring stuff to get into my head) there are times where the researcher is better off NOT disclosing him/herself....to protect...him/herself...and is - ethically - allowed to do so!

now....at some projects researchers are even adviced not to disclose it even afterwards either...I think our OP would have benefitted from just enjoying herself about the results and just to shut up...nevertheless...I am glad she did say it and don't see it as an issue.

IMO it is not unethical as some folks mentioned...as after all it was one-offs to people and she explained it to them afterwards ... it is not like stringing them around for ages and doing false promises like many fools do on here


_____________________________

RIP 08-09-07

The PAST is history, the FUTURE a mystery, NOW is a gift - that's why it's called the PRESENT

www.butyoudontlooksick.com/navigation/BYDLS-TheSpoonTheory.pdf

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 6:03:39 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JBGolden

Well, in my opinion it definitely should be common sense that well written responses would get better results. Do I believe this to always be the case however?

No. Because that's just what I do and I definitely can't tout a 100% response rate. So there's a couple of things I'm curious about. You say you put up an average looking guy's picture. What picture was it? What did you write in your profile? Did you only message people near you or also further away? Did all 40 people you messaged look at your profile before answering that first time? There's so many variables that goes into getting a response past just writing a good message that you might've just got lucky getting a response to all of those if it's like you said it is.

While I don't think the OP acted maliciously I can see why some people would frown on it. I do mainly because I read about somebody who wrote a fake profile, wrote 40 messages and got responses from all 40 when I put in the same effort and got nowhere that amount. It seems a bit braggy and rankling.


This is my point as well JB from a few pages back (as well as juliaoceania and LadyPact and I'm sure a few others). Hopefully this will be addressed.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to JBGolden)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 6:32:06 AM   
Fitznicely


Posts: 1597
Joined: 10/18/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
If a thousand people have already said the same thing, is the thousandth and first person really contributing to 'the community'?


I'd like to know which Moderator it is that's keeping a tally of topics covered, and who plans to close the boards when it reaches 100%...

It's just one of the perils of being on a board for a long time, you see everything go past a million times. Thing is, when someone new joins, they maybe read a little, then muster the guts to post. Not everyone WANTS to use the search and trawl through 20-page threads from six years ago. I tried, I've searched the archives a lot, and even though the conversations are interesting, it's BORING! Some people want to engage in up-to-date conversation with likeminded people today.

Tolerance and patience is what's called for, even if it means turning out the same advice for the thousand and second time.


_____________________________

I tell you this: No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn
Proud Owner of Darkmoonkat. Such a good girl!

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 6:34:31 AM   
LillyoftheVally


Posts: 1826
Joined: 7/22/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phoenixpower
but...yanno....with me having my research exam tomorrow (never had such boring stuff to get into my head) there are times where the researcher is better off NOT disclosing him/herself....to protect...him/herself...and is - ethically - allowed to do so!

now....at some projects researchers are even adviced not to disclose it even afterwards either...I think our OP would have benefitted from just enjoying herself about the results and just to shut up...nevertheless...I am glad she did say it and don't see it as an issue.

IMO it is not unethical as some folks mentioned...as after all it was one-offs to people and she explained it to them afterwards ... it is not like stringing them around for ages and doing false promises like many fools do on here



It is true that some researchers don't disclose themselves afterwards, when they have done something potentially dangerous (I am thinking researchers who have entered gangs and other such things) However this isn't the same, this isn't a formal research, the results don't mean anything. The only reason why she shouldn't disclose it to them is because she is simply adding to all the other shit on this site that people complain about.

It is unethical because she lied, full stop doesn't matter that it was only one lie nor that she explained the original act was unethical, of course that is basing it on this insane notion that it is compatible to real research, as it isn't then really its about personal ethics, the OP herself agreed that it was so therefore it is.

_____________________________

'My doctor says that I have a malformed public-duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre, and that I am therefore excused from saving Universes.'

Nah I am not happy to see you either

(in reply to Phoenixpower)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 6:38:55 AM   
Scheherazade67


Posts: 25
Joined: 1/16/2010
Status: offline
Too funny.

(in reply to jujubeeMB)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 6:55:21 AM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


And as far as 100% response, well, how the fuck can we trust her results when she is an admitted fraud, poser, and unethical.... and yes I will say that as someone who works with human subjects and needs internal review of any research I undertake, people who play with other people in this way to satisfy their own curiosity  knowing what they are doing is wrong, well those people suck



Maybe here? In red?.....Nice people do silly things, *wrong* things...........it doesn't make them crappy people, it makes them people that have done *stuff wrong*.

Pretty much like every person I have ever known.

As for the.......

I think the minute you give a sincere apology to this community and prove that you made things right with the others, the faster you will overcome this. No one made you confess this. You made this all public out of your own will and volition. Now deal with the mess you made graciously instead of being snarky.

...... She's got nothing to apologise for in some ridiculous *community* sense. She did what she did, for reasons she made clear.....no matter how misguided, no matter how nuts, no matter WHAT...the idea she has to make some kind of *sincere apology* to *this community* is fucking ridiculous.

I'm not remotely affronted by her *experiment*.   She's seen the result of TELLING people about it, though. You can bet your sweet bippy she won't be doing that soon.

agirl



(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 6:56:23 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

WildRebel, my post was not directed to you, sorry should have hit fast reply.

I was addressing the posters who came in late, very late after I and many other posters already debated with the OP.

We all got through it and the thread went light and more fun and then some came late and are still asking the OP to defend herself, which she has more than adequately done.


Well that's the problem with the forums. If someone hits this thread and starts reading, there is a good chance they will reply to something before they read all 10+ pages. So the OP is going to have to understand that this thread may be around for a while.

As to the subject itself, I think it was a pretty stupid prank. It had the possibility of hurting innocent people and proved nothing. I'm glad that it appears she has learned from this, but it is also possible that all she has learned is to not admit it when she pulls another prank. Which is the big problem with something like this. Once I have found out someone has lied, I have a real hard problem ever believing anything they say after that. As far as the responses to this prank, the OP has already said non of the participants will come here to confirm or deny anything. And at this point if they did show up and start confirming her story, how many people would believe and how many would wonder if the OP just had another fake profile available?


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 7:13:09 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

FR

There are 2 other people on this thead who have admitted setting up fake profiles and messaging people. Why has nobody taken them to task for their dishonesty?



I suppose I could go back and find them, but I didn't read those posts... and they did not start this thread on the guise they were contributing something....


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to susie)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 7:15:48 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

Maybe here? In red?.....Nice people do silly things, *wrong* things...........it doesn't make them crappy people, it makes them people that have done *stuff wrong*.


That was my first response.. and perhaps I phrased it wrongly, but the next few responses I did say it the way I intended it... that what she did sucks...


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to agirl)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: An Experiment - 2/7/2010 7:20:38 AM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
ROFLCOPTER - this thread cracks me the fuck up.



_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: An Experiment Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094