NeedToUseYou
Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005 From: None of your business Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie People either embrace and learn....or reject and argue....that which they do not understand. hmmm, why does it mean they don't understand, I personally understand alot of things I reject. I reject them because I understand them. Like I understand Communism, and reject and argue against it. Unrelated, but it illustrates one can understand and still reject it. As far as Literal boundless no-limits slaves go, I'm sure they exist, I hope they all have good masters. Whether I personally think it is good to be that way is another thing. But like every conversation up here, it seems it all gets tied up on definitions. Reading how different people use the same word instead of applying one definition as universal goes a long way, especially in the case of a made up non-standardized BDSM term. no-limits for newer people usually means, no-limits from what I know BDSM to involve that's what I thought it meant initially. Literal no-limits but the context is more based on the little checkmarks on BDSM surveys. So the universe of limits is limited compared to the more educated BDSM community. no-limits for others it means my master won't test them anyway, and if he/she did I wouldn't be there anymore. In other words I chose my master based upon the fact I know he is a certain type of person and thus wouldn't do such things. So, in the sphere of our relationship my master will never want anything of me that would be a personal limit. Again, Implicit No Limits, because it will never be tested. Since No Limit has been reached it implies the lack of limits though they may still be there it's irrelevant in this situation. <----This is were in my opinion most really are as I doubt any here have tested such theories to the highest degree, though most believe they are in the next category because they believe, and may really do anything but it remains nearly universally provable---> no-limits for others means, I'd do anything, kill, rape, murder, steal, whatever for my Master. Literal Universal No Limits, from the widest available field of possible Limits. However, the only possible way to test this is to expose the slave to every possible command, a literal impossiblity. Thus not provable. Absolute Limitless possiblities cannot be proven or disproven, thus the set of possibilities one has dealt with define one as being No-Limits or Limited. I cannot prove a limit I will never be asked to cross. So, to me everyone is really just arguing about the definition they are currently using and relating to other peoples comments without thinking of the way they are using the term. One persons No-Limit slave will be anothers Very Limited Slave. BDSM terminology sucks that's my overall opinion because it is morphed into internalized self meaning by most people using it(there is no formalized meaning and most don't want there to be either). And since the meaning is very personal it invariably will illicit a response when challenged. Blame it on BDSM. just a opinion. Thanks
|