lovingpet
Posts: 4270
Joined: 6/19/2005 Status: offline
|
I usually don't mess around with the theoretical stuff, but I can take a shot at this. I do it mainly as a mental exercise for me. My partner has attempted to have me understand that, though we are not equal and one is superior simply by position, no one is inferior and inequality does not mean one being greater than and one being less than. As he explains it, it would be similar to trying to compare apples and oranges. They simply aren't the same. My personality and role in the relationship is completely different than his. That makes neither of lesser importance and gives neither an edge in being somehow better. While an orange may be far superior to the apple for elevating low blood sugar and supplying vitamin c, one cannot overlook the benefits of the apple including the strong fiber content and contribution of calcium. It is the same with the two of us, we will not function the same within the relationship, but we both contribute our own parts to the overall health of that relationship. This is not like a numeric equation where one side that isn't equal will have to be bigger or smaller than the other. It is more like saying circle equals rectangle. They really can't be compared based on their shape. Only under closer examination do you realize that the two structures, though clearly nothing alike, actually are equal in some far more significant ways such as width or surface areas. The core of our relationship is where equality reigns. We love equally, respect equally, trust equally, and endeavour equally. If we don't, then the whole structure begins to faulter. It doesn't matter that our shapes in this world are different or that he is the roof and I am the floor. Doesn't the floor get ruined in a storm without a roof to cover it? And what happens to that roof should the floor buckle? I still have trouble. I still see it as so much more of a balance. One must be lower for the other to be higher. One leads and one follows and clearly since survival depends on a good leader, that leader must be a better specimen than the follower. He is slowly trying to show me that a leader who does not have a capable follower dies. He is trying to get me to understand that it isn't about the rise and fall of position, but about the kinetics that keep the exchange going. I find the more I understand his way of thinking, the better I can feel in my own submissive position. I know that I am valued, respected, and needed, and all of that for who I really am. lovingpet
_____________________________
If you put your head into more, you'd have to put your back into less. ~Me 10 Fluffy pts.
|