juliaoceania
Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006 From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow Status: offline
|
quote:
For the same reason it is wrong for men ... it demonstrates low self-esteem and encourages others to abuse the individual. Hmmmmm.... I do not agree. It can demonstrate low self esteem, but it can also be an expression of the individual's sensuality and even be artistic. I think the human body is beautiful... at least some of them are quote:
I support the closed poly paradigm. I believe it is possible for a deep, meaningful loving relationship to develop between more than two people. However, note that I would only support such a relationship involving a life-long commitment between the members of the relationship, as would be the case in a monogamous relationship. So any sex outside of a committed relationship is wrong to you... hmmmm... just do not agree with that either. Some people enjoy sex for sex sake... and those people should be shagging each other...It is Darwinian. I am not a Christian person with a bunch of hang ups, people wanna mate, even if they are not currently in love. The wrong thing would be to lead people on or to lie to them to get sex, but being honest and upfront about needs, well there is nothing wrong in that. quote:
Neither is in a position to determine with any certainty that the other is capable of making such a decision freely, or is driven to it due to low self-esteem, damage caused by past abuse, etc. Thus neither is in a position to feel confident that the intended activity won't further damage the other, or trigger an episode, etc. Furthermore there is no reason to feel confident one can handle whatever behaviour might manifest in response to a triggered memory or symptoms arising from past abuse. I think far more people are damaged by people they believe love them than by casual partners. I have never been hurt by anyone i wasn't involved with for a long time, because it is those people I trusted enough to give them access to my heart.... I cannot imagine giving a casual partner enough power to hurt me emotionally. I do not play casually because without letting someone close enough to be vulnerable to them, it doesn't appeal, but to others it does.... quote:
Yes. A lack of concern for the emotional well-being or the ability to provide meaningful consent so that one can experience a cheap thrill demonstrates a degree of selfishness which I consider abusive. How can you measure another person's lack of concern or their motivations toward another... are you psychic? quote:
And many don't, crushed by the experience and unable to find outside suport, perhaps even unaware on a conscious level of how the damage is acting on them. Are you suggesting it's 'Open Season' on people such as these? Do we have no obligation to determine a person's ability to provide meaningful consent? Or is it enough to have no more than a pulse? You know, this is where circular logic comes in, when people claim that they operate in a healthy way and are happy, you just pull the "you are unaware" card on them and that solidifies your position in your mind... hard to argue with someone that has judged you as unaware... seriously... that is just not cool.
_____________________________
Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt
|