RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 2:05:30 PM)

or the levels of shit you dump out here, fats.





Sanity -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 2:47:48 PM)


The main problem with your train of thought is that without global warming there is now way that carbon can be defined as any kind of a poison.

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

Well, ok, if people want to cut atmospheric pollution, but doubt global warming, then lets approach things from a different perspective.

Should we NOT be concerned, even alarmed, at the billions of tons of shit being pumped into the atmosphere?

How does the coutner argument go- "Oh, yes, we agree this is a terrible and dangerous thing to do, with results that could be disastrous.....but no, we are only disagreeing with the warming part."

Does the end result- that we should cut back on how much carbon dioxide, monoxide, sulphur and methane we produce- change even one iota?

Pumping all this stuff into the atmosphere IS pollution.




FatDomDaddy -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:06:17 PM)

Stop confusing them




rulemylife -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:25:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The main problem with your train of thought is that without global warming there is now way that carbon can be defined as any kind of a poison.



No kidding?

Then let's try an experiment.

Get some duct tape and a garden hose.  Close your garage door, hook one end to the exhaust pipe of your car then take the other end and sit in your car with the windows rolled up.

Then come back and tell me carbon monoxide is not a poison......................if you survive that is.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:28:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The main problem with your train of thought is that without global warming there is now way that carbon can be defined as any kind of a poison.



No kidding?

Then let's try an experiment.

Get some duct tape and a garden hose.  Close your garage door, hook one end to the exhaust pipe of your car then take the other end and sit in your car with the windows rolled up.

Then come back and tell me carbon monoxide is not a poison......................if you survive that is.



Which of course has nothing to do with CO2. Not even a passable attempt at a strawman, even for you.




Thadius -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:28:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The main problem with your train of thought is that without global warming there is now way that carbon can be defined as any kind of a poison.



No kidding?

Then let's try an experiment.

Get some duct tape and a garden hose.  Close your garage door, hook one end to the exhaust pipe of your car then take the other end and sit in your car with the windows rolled up.

Then come back and tell me carbon monoxide is not a poison......................if you survive that is.


Yeah, but isn't it CO2 that the EPA is threatening to declare a poison?




mnottertail -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:30:23 PM)

OK, then suck the oxygen out of a room and fill it with CO2. Tell me what happens?




Thadius -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:37:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

OK, then suck the oxygen out of a room and fill it with CO2. Tell me what happens?

Why not go pure Oxygen? Or Nitrogen? Helium? Hydrogen?

Its an invalid argument. There is no vacuum sucking all of the other gasses out of the atmosphere, and one could argue that there are natural scrubbers converting the CO2 back into oxygen...

I am all for keeping our ground, air, and water clean. I am even for getting rid of some of the extra people wandering around that are polluting them. (I can think of a couple places to drop strategic nukes to wipe out a couple billion or so.)




luckydawg -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:38:06 PM)

The same thing if you took all the CO2 out and replaced it with O2. Or any other stupid nonsense example, which has no bearing on reality.

It is nice to see you come swooping in to save RMl, yet again....




FatDomDaddy -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:41:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

or the levels of shit you dump out here, fats.





Hey, I see your famous wit is in full form today.




FatDomDaddy -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:42:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

OK, then suck the oxygen out of a room and fill it with CO2. Tell me what happens?



I dunno... will there be plants in the room?




luckydawg -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 3:42:50 PM)

trolls is as trolls does....




DomKen -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 4:05:56 PM)

I guess some people don't know what triggers the breathing reflex in people




luckydawg -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 4:14:52 PM)

Hey domken I noticed you ducked out on the Obama killing with no trial thread, after it was pointed out how you were completely incorrect. Such a small amount of intellectuall integrity you have...




DarlingSavage -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 4:15:27 PM)

Both our simulations of the last deglaciation, and the result that the equilibrium response of sea-level change to temperature is non-linear over the last deglaciation, are robust to the length of the time step used, and are still valid.

That is part of the retraction statement that was submitted to the science journal in question. Basically, they're saying that they over looked a couple of items and asked to have their article retracted, however, they still believe that their estimations on sea-level change are still valid. They gave a pretty wide berth in their estimation of sea level rise of 7 to 82 cm.




FatDomDaddy -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 4:16:44 PM)

I've noticed he's also avoided the whole Jiggaboo Jones thread altogether




DomKen -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 4:18:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Hey domken I noticed you ducked out on the Obama killing with no trial thread, after it was pointed out how you were completely incorrect. Such a small amount of intellectuall integrity you have...

What? You responded? I missed it. I'll go see what lie you told right now.




Thadius -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 4:21:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage

Both our simulations of the last deglaciation, and the result that the equilibrium response of sea-level change to temperature is non-linear over the last deglaciation, are robust to the length of the time step used, and are still valid.

That is part of the retraction statement that was submitted to the science journal in question. Basically, they're saying that they over looked a couple of items and asked to have their article retracted, however, they still believe that their estimations on sea-level change are still valid. They gave a pretty wide berth in their estimation of sea level rise of 7 to 82 cm.


Based on current data available, I predict that average annual global temperatures will rise or fall 1 to 10 degrees C over the next century.

[;)]




DarlingSavage -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 4:23:47 PM)

Lookie here! I just found 4 polar bears, they're fine! Nothing to worry about here.



[image]local://upfiles/875047/7FB5E1FBBEDF47B7A57265041F42D26B.jpg[/image]




luckydawg -> RE: OPPS...There Go the Rising Sea Levels! (2/22/2010 4:25:16 PM)

yes posting links to the BBC and the NYTimes about the fact that the Usa uses drone attackts to kill suspects, along with anyoine near them often including thier families, is a lie.......

As is pointing out that your claim that we only kill in battle is false. The drones hit targets in Pakistan and Yemen, where we have zero combat troops on the ground. http://www.collarchat.com/m_3078466/mpage_1/tm.htm#

Domken is so snarky, because he knew he was lying when he posted it, and I provided proof he's lying.

Since he won't acknowledge being wrong, he will go attack and insult.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.320313E-02