RE: About the "Flood" ... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Smutmonger -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 7:27:39 PM)

I actually liked the version of "Passing through the door to Elysium" you see at the End of the movie "Gladiator" with Russel Crowe.
If there is anything after death-I would rather beleive in that version. Perhaps these are your Summerlands.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved
If revelations is correct, my father, my wife and my son are all slated for the lake of fire.

I doubt that. Humanity and the human mind is evolving. In the course of millenniums perforce the relationship with the Divine changes.

I do not know why you think that your deceased are slated for a lake of fire, but you are probably wrong. People usually are.

May the God of the Dead reward your deceased according to their merits.


Thank you.

I do not believe in the book of revelations.

In my 30s, before I met my wife, I had an experience which I consider fundamentally spiritual, a vision of my father and grandfather in what I later learned is a place called "The Summer Lands".

We were able to talk, say our farewells, something we never got to do in life. It put my soul to rest regarding death.

Death is not the end.

When my wife and son passed away, this belief was considerably helpful.

There is so much more to life than worrying about whether some old guy with a beard will be punting me into a lake of fire.

So much to learn about love ...






Smutmonger -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 7:31:06 PM)

this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3Ij35niYHg




BLoved -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 7:41:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved
I am unfamiliar with any scientific theory or fact that states there was a time when there was no rain but that moisture arose from the ground.

To the best of my understanding, there are two hypothesized sources for the water found on our planet. One source is water in the materials which formed the Earth, with surface water resulting from condensation due to the outgassing of water vapor. The other hypothesized source is comets. But whether one or the other or both, and in the latter case how much due to each, remains unknown to the best of my knowledge. Perhaps someone else can add more.


I am familiar with both those theories. The events described were said to have occured some 4 billion years ago. I had no idea anyone was linking either with the bible.




BLoved -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 7:44:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex
So of course the brutal God who vaporized Sodom and Gomorrah was actually kinder, more just and loving than the daily perversity of droughts and floods the people had to contend with.


Don't even get me started on S&G ...




AnimusRex -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 7:48:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved

Don't even get me started on S&G ...



DEAL!




BLoved -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 7:51:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Smutmonger

I actually liked the version of "Passing through the door to Elysium" you see at the End of the movie "Gladiator" with Russel Crowe.
If there is anything after death-I would rather beleive in that version. Perhaps these are your Summerlands.


I cry when I get to that part ... there are days ...

Yes, I wondered if there might be a connection. Wiki describes the Summerland as "containing wide (possibly eternal) fields of rolling green hills and lush grass".

That was exactly what I saw in my vision.




Smutmonger -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 7:58:02 PM)

I know, it's a real tear jerker-bitter sweet. I don't care for religions-I see most of them as political manipulation attempts. The book is still open to me on the subject of human energies and the spiritual realm. There is simply too much that I cannot explain away with a cold,scientific approach.

Especially with things I have done with kink-and D/s.

And really,is a world devoid of mystery and a sense of awe really worth living in? I don't wish to be so cruel as to remove things from people's lives that they find comfort in. I just don't want them to try to force them on me.

[;)]
quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved

quote:

ORIGINAL: Smutmonger

I actually liked the version of "Passing through the door to Elysium" you see at the End of the movie "Gladiator" with Russel Crowe.
If there is anything after death-I would rather beleive in that version. Perhaps these are your Summerlands.


I cry when I get to that part ... there are days ...

Yes, I wondered if there might be a connection. Wiki describes the Summerland as "containing wide (possibly eternal) fields of rolling green hills and lush grass".

That was exactly what I saw in my vision.






blacksword404 -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 9:33:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

I would say that the lesson is to be prepared and plan ahead for changes in the environment. 

FYI - Stories of a great flood are common in cultures around the world.



Billions of years and dinosaurs going extinct via meteor. But no flood. 

Some people need repetition to get it.   [:D]




BLoved -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 9:52:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Smutmonger
I know, it's a real tear jerker-bitter sweet. I don't care for religions-I see most of them as political manipulation attempts. The book is still open to me on the subject of human energies and the spiritual realm. There is simply too much that I cannot explain away with a cold,scientific approach.

Especially with things I have done with kink-and D/s.

And really,is a world devoid of mystery and a sense of awe really worth living in? I don't wish to be so cruel as to remove things from people's lives that they find comfort in. I just don't want them to try to force them on me.

[;)]


~smile~

Actually, I've answered the question of god, the universe and our relationship with everything else.

It requires one to conceptualize the universe in terms of four dimensions, to recognize that everything in the universe is physically connected with everything else, that the universe is one thing, including us.

From there it is not difficult to offer support for a hypothesis that the universe is sentient, aware of itself, that this awareness is expressed through life, what we see in 3-d reality as living organisms, including us.

When viewed in this way I find that everything and everyone is just as much a part of "me" as my skin and bones, just as I am a part of everything and everyone.

It is only because our senses ignore the fourth dimension to focus only on the three dimensions that we see each other as distinct and detached entities. In four dimensions there is a very real connection which can be scientifically proven, providing one accepts the theory regarding the 'big bang'.




sravaka -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/24/2010 4:29:51 AM)

I will probably regret this....  but, so be it.

Three thoughts:

1.  To me, the Bible, OT and NT alike, tell the story of a people "growing up" with an ever evolving understanding of the nature of their place in the world and/or of their God. (related questions)   It starts out with "do this! don't do that!" when people are constantly on the edge of extermination, whether through natural or human means....  there's no time to think about "love" et al., until things settle down a bit.

2.  I'm absolutely with Musicmystery from way back in the first couple pages--  you simply cannot hope to read any text intelligently, or derive any useful "answers" from it, without consciousness of a) how it came into being and b) how it reached you.  You need to think about the historical circumstances not just in which OT evolved, not just in which the NT revised the OT, but also about how Augustine, Jerome, Aquinas, Luther, Joseph Smith, Pope John Paul II (i need a televangist name here to round things out-- fill in your own), whoever....  how all these "authorities" over time shaped/constrained interpretation in exceedingly complex/entangled ways.   (I'm not speaking of religious sense here-- that tends to be a matter of "faith" et al....  but if you want to pose the question in an abstract way, these things need to be accounted for.  Faith, or history:  take your pick.  there is no 3rd option.) 

3.  In Buddhism there is "upaya," (sometiimes translated "expedient means.")  The idea is that the Buddha tailors his message according to the receptiveness and cluefulness of the audience.   Thus you had intensively monastic, rule-driven Buddhism first, and "woo hoo! we all have buddha-nature!" Buddhism later.

Maybe the god of the OT was playing the same sort of game.  He just omitted to give a handy word for it.




BLoved -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/24/2010 4:53:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sravaka
I will probably regret this....  but, so be it.

Three thoughts:

1.  To me, the Bible, OT and NT alike, tell the story of a people "growing up" with an ever evolving understanding of the nature of their place in the world and/or of their God. (related questions)   It starts out with "do this! don't do that!" when people are constantly on the edge of extermination, whether through natural or human means....  there's no time to think about "love" et al., until things settle down a bit.

2.  I'm absolutely with Musicmystery from way back in the first couple pages--  you simply cannot hope to read any text intelligently, or derive any useful "answers" from it, without consciousness of a) how it came into being and b) how it reached you.  You need to think about the historical circumstances not just in which OT evolved, not just in which the NT revised the OT, but also about how Augustine, Jerome, Aquinas, Luther, Joseph Smith, Pope John Paul II (i need a televangist name here to round things out-- fill in your own), whoever....  how all these "authorities" over time shaped/constrained interpretation in exceedingly complex/entangled ways.   (I'm not speaking of religious sense here-- that tends to be a matter of "faith" et al....  but if you want to pose the question in an abstract way, these things need to be accounted for.  Faith, or history:  take your pick.  there is no 3rd option.) 

3.  In Buddhism there is "upaya," (sometiimes translated "expedient means.")  The idea is that the Buddha tailors his message according to the receptiveness and cluefulness of the audience.   Thus you had intensively monastic, rule-driven Buddhism first, and "woo hoo! we all have buddha-nature!" Buddhism later.

Maybe the god of the OT was playing the same sort of game.  He just omitted to give a handy word for it.


I think that is a useful approach when answering the question "what is the history of this story". But that is not the question I am asking.

I am asking "What does this story mean to you?" To Christians I ask a subsequent question: "how do you reconcile the Flood with the Sermon on the Mount?"




BLoved -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/24/2010 5:01:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: blacksword404
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval
FYI - Stories of a great flood are common in cultures around the world.


Billions of years and dinosaurs going extinct via meteor. But no flood. 


Actually Vendaval is right. There are many stories of catastrophic flooding, believed to be the result of melting at the end of the last ice age.

Keep in mind the Bering land bridge, the English Channel, the Mediterranean and the Black Sea were all dry land during the ice age. There is geological evidence of flooding in north america, the result of ice dams giving way and releasing as much water as is in the great lakes now.

Granted, there is no flood such as is described in Genesis, but the filling of the Mediterranean or the Black Sea might well have seemed to be the end of the earth to the local inhabitants.




eyesopened -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/24/2010 5:02:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened
What I find interesting about the story is that the earth is described as previous to this event, having not experienced any rain at all but moisture arose from the ground.  Science confirms this but it would have been at a time in earth's history before there were humans.


I am unfamiliar with any scientific theory or fact that states there was a time when there was no rain but that moisture arose from the ground.

Would you please provide more details?



http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/water/?section=blueplanet&page=blueplanet_d#
How did all the water we see around us get here? Most scientists argue for an origin in the planet itself. Water was present in the cloud of gases and dust from which Earth formed, and volcanic eruptions on early Earth must have brought much of it to the surface in the form of water vapor.
http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/5b.html
Most of the Earth's early atmosphere was created in the first one million years after solidification (4.4 billion years ago). Carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and water vapor dominated this early atmosphere.
 
Here's some interesting reading:
http://www.earthhistory.org.uk/genesis-6-11-and-other-texts/the-tradition-in-sumer/




BLoved -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/24/2010 5:24:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened
quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved
Would you please provide more details?


http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/water/?section=blueplanet&page=blueplanet_d#
How did all the water we see around us get here? Most scientists argue for an origin in the planet itself. Water was present in the cloud of gases and dust from which Earth formed, and volcanic eruptions on early Earth must have brought much of it to the surface in the form of water vapor.
http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/5b.html
Most of the Earth's early atmosphere was created in the first one million years after solidification (4.4 billion years ago). Carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and water vapor dominated this early atmosphere.
 
Here's some interesting reading:
http://www.earthhistory.org.uk/genesis-6-11-and-other-texts/the-tradition-in-sumer/


Thank you.

I should point out that there was rain and rainbows long before Genesis.

Rivers do not flow if there is no rain, nor do mountains erode. There is more than sufficient evidence of both prior to the existence of humanity.




eyesopened -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/24/2010 3:48:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened
quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved
Would you please provide more details?


http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/water/?section=blueplanet&page=blueplanet_d#
How did all the water we see around us get here? Most scientists argue for an origin in the planet itself. Water was present in the cloud of gases and dust from which Earth formed, and volcanic eruptions on early Earth must have brought much of it to the surface in the form of water vapor.
http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/5b.html
Most of the Earth's early atmosphere was created in the first one million years after solidification (4.4 billion years ago). Carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and water vapor dominated this early atmosphere.
 
Here's some interesting reading:
http://www.earthhistory.org.uk/genesis-6-11-and-other-texts/the-tradition-in-sumer/


Thank you.

I should point out that there was rain and rainbows long before Genesis.

Rivers do not flow if there is no rain, nor do mountains erode. There is more than sufficient evidence of both prior to the existence of humanity.


Yes!  Of course!  It's just a story.  I thought it interesting that the story mentions a phenomenom that should not have been known to the writer of the story.  The writer would have known about water of course but should not have known about the early atmosphere prior to human existance.  But it was mentioned.  I found it interesting. 

But again, there are some people who are really just looking for ways to throw out as much negativity they can muster regarding anything that might be called sacred text.  For those people, it doesn't matter.  God is an asshat and the Bible is best used as toilet paper.  *shrug*




BLoved -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/24/2010 4:37:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened
quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved
Rivers do not flow if there is no rain, nor do mountains erode. There is more than sufficient evidence of both prior to the existence of humanity.


Yes!  Of course!  It's just a story.  I thought it interesting that the story mentions a phenomenom that should not have been known to the writer of the story.  The writer would have known about water of course but should not have known about the early atmosphere prior to human existance.  But it was mentioned.  I found it interesting. 


I think you will find a lot of stories like that explaining how things came to be the way they are. You can see it most clearly in the stories of North American native cultures. Each is rich in metaphor and animism. I suspect if we were able to trace back all modern faiths to their ultimate roots you'd find the tribal elders sitting around a campfire telling their young ones stories about how the moon got into the sky, and how the trees came to be.

I see the tale of Noe as a combination of oral tradition and mythology. It explains a lot more than just the rainbow. It explains what the Chinese call "dragon bones": fossils. It explains why there are big valleys with little rivers or streams running at the bottom. It also explains why there was just one catastrophic flood (the flooding of the mediterranean, the flooding of the black sea, the failure of an ice dam, take your pick). God repented. And the rainbow becomes a mystical symbol for Hope. Before this it had no meaning, which is why it is presented as just being invented by God.

At least, that is how I view it.




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 12 [13]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875