BLoved -> RE: About the "Flood" ... (2/23/2010 9:43:45 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: InvisibleBlack quote:
ORIGINAL: BLoved I am of the opinion that life does indeed have purpose and meaning: it is an opportunty for us to learn to love one another, here and now. What matters is whether we love others, and are loved by others. As I see it, learning to be the best I can be, a life-long process, is my best hope for learning to love and be loved. I think we're in agreement here. But the purpose of life is not to lead a blissful existance free of pain. Without suffering, without enduring hardship - how can one come to an understanding that others suffer as well? In a world without any pain or tragedy, would one ever be able to develop the compassion and empathy to be able to connect with others, to see yourself in them and them in yoourself, and to understanding that to help - to love and to help those around you - is the higher good? Children who grow up with everything they want just as they want it do not end up well-adjusted and compasisonate souls - they become spoiled monsters. Those are the children who are not loved. A life of love does not require that there be an end to hardship, tragedy, suffering or pain. All of things are a part of life and none of them require a human to cause them. Natural disasters, accidents and illnesses are cause enough. I don't think we need experience them personally to relate to the feelings of others. Indeed, our experiences may prevent us from understanding the feelings of others, as there is usually more than one way to deal with tragedy. I consider how a child will cry if he or she witnesses his/her parent crying. We are naturally sympathetic to the feelings of others. Over time we learn to control that abiity, to shut it off, but it is there, beneath the surface. quote:
quote:
I need no faith in a sadistic god to accomplish that purpose. No one asked you to have any. You asked how it's possible to reconcile God's acts in a Christian context. I'm saying it's possible. You don't have to buy into it - but you can acknowledge that others who do may have valid reasons for doing so. So let's see if I understand correctly. We have a god in genesis who views us as insignificant specks to be snuffed at whim. No biggie, he can snap his fingers and re-create them. We have a god in the nt who loves us so much he sacrifices his only son to pay for the sins he allowed to happen when he allowed satan into eden knowing in advance how that would work out. At no time does god not know what is going to happen in the future. Everything he does, he does knowing full well what the consequences will be. So the god who thinks of us as specks to be drowned is also the god who loves us so much we should worship him with gratitude that he was willing to sacrifice his only begotten son for our sins, which would never have occurred if he'd kept satan out of eden. Do I have that right?
|
|
|
|