Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 9:41:50 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth
I already have, I was looking for your explanation, which you neatly dodge every time you are asked for it.

Simply read this thread and study the video that RealOne linked to. Also consider whether I am stupid.



Your postings on this subject have undoubtedly caused many people to ponder that very question. Unlike most, I don't believe you are. Its clear that you're mentally ill, and I think your mental illness causes you to think and say stupid things. Same with a couple of other conspiracy people in this thread (not all of them but a couple). That's not necessarily the same thing as being stupid.

At any rate, your arguments make no sense at all. You just make up whatever you need to make up in order to believe whatever you want to believe. I think you genuinely believe your arguments make sense, but the only people who agree are other people who are mentally ill.

No offense. You're a great guy and I really like you. Same with PA, and Mister Rodgers and Mister Mister - they're nice people too. But you're all nuts.



we present material evidence to show the guberment conspiratards lied and you call us the conspiracy theorists?  Get a fucking clue already, we are the conspiracy debunkers here vs the idjits that think 19 sand grubs took over our 400 billion dollar defense system and changed all the fucking laws of physics for one day.







Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 421
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 9:43:06 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
Its clear that you're mentally ill

Oh, I am crazy alright. All supergeniuses are. Unfortunately I could not get a psychiatrist to accept that I am crazy; them people only know what they have been taught in class.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
At any rate, your arguments make no sense at all. You just make up whatever you need to make up in order to believe whatever you want to believe.

I do not want to believe anything, so I have no reason to make up anything. I am only interested in truth, preferably new truths.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
You're a great guy and I really like you. Same with PA, and Mister Rodgers and Mister Mister - they're nice people too.

Thank you. You are a great guy as well.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
But you're all nuts.

I do not know about them other people, but I am indeed nuts, yes. I appreciate the compliment. Thank you.

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 422
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 9:50:09 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
Its clear that you're mentally ill

Oh, I am crazy alright. All supergeniuses are. Unfortunately I could not get a psychiatrist to accept that I am crazy; them people only know what they have been taught in class.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
At any rate, your arguments make no sense at all. You just make up whatever you need to make up in order to believe whatever you want to believe.

I do not want to believe anything, so I have no reason to make up anything. I am only interested in truth, preferably new truths.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
You're a great guy and I really like you. Same with PA, and Mister Rodgers and Mister Mister - they're nice people too.

Thank you. You are a great guy as well.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
But you're all nuts.

I do not know about them other people, but I am indeed nuts, yes. I appreciate the compliment. Thank you.



Typical tactics- to silence those who speak things that make others uncomfortable.

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 423
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 10:15:06 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		http://dprogram.net/2010/03/06/most-decorated-us-marine-general-purpose-of-all-us-wars-is-billions-for-insiders%E2%80%99-profits/

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 424
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 11:30:17 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

you didnt ask for an opinion you asked for a fucking theory. Apparently you dont know the difference.


oooo you wily coyote you, can't put one by you can I? Okay then, since apparently asking someone for their theory is inappropriate, I guess that you and your fellow nutballs posting your theories is inappropriate too, huh? In which case this whole thread should be blown to smithereens.

Oh, btw the word theory has more than one definition. At Dictionary.com I found these two:

6.contemplation or speculation. 7.guess or conjecture.

Both do nicely to define what I asked Rule for. Nothing to do with science at all, I know he isn't a scientist.



_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 425
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 11:36:59 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

you didnt ask for an opinion you asked for a fucking theory. Apparently you dont know the difference.


oooo you wily coyote you, can't put one by you can I? Okay then, since apparently asking someone for their theory is inappropriate, I guess that you and your fellow nutballs posting your theories is inappropriate too, huh? In which case this whole thread should be blown to smithereens.

Oh, btw the word theory has more than one definition. At Dictionary.com I found these two:

6.contemplation or speculation. 7.guess or conjecture.

Both do nicely to define what I asked Rule for. Nothing to do with science at all, I know he isn't a scientist.




think insurance FRAUD.

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 426
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 11:37:10 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth
Oh, btw the word theory has more than one definition. At Dictionary.com I found these two:

6.contemplation or speculation. 7.guess or conjecture.

These definitions are not accepted by philosophers of science.

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 427
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 11:52:50 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

you didnt ask for an opinion you asked for a fucking theory. Apparently you dont know the difference.


oooo you wily coyote you, can't put one by you can I? Okay then, since apparently asking someone for their theory is inappropriate, I guess that you and your fellow nutballs posting your theories is inappropriate too, huh? In which case this whole thread should be blown to smithereens.

Oh, btw the word theory has more than one definition. At Dictionary.com I found these two:

6.contemplation or speculation. 7.guess or conjecture.

Both do nicely to define what I asked Rule for. Nothing to do with science at all, I know he isn't a scientist.




and the guberment gave you more?



quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

DEMOLITION VERSUS COLLAPSE

See the difference....






quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caATBZEKL4c&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbauH-mvmDw

big bodda fucka boom!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVQaVgJne6c

and another

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syzKBBB_THE

and another

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ1E2NPl-s8


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

RealOne posted the link to the video in his post 126.


they wont ever look at that or admit that they did.

that is why they keep pleading ignorance to what has been shown time and time again


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5sljqUnUQs&feature=response_watch

big badda boom!

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/7/2010 11:54:48 AM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 428
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 11:55:15 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth
Oh, btw the word theory has more than one definition. At Dictionary.com I found these two:

6.contemplation or speculation. 7.guess or conjecture.

These definitions are not accepted by philosophers of science.



True, but I'm not asking scientists for their professional opinion, I'm asking you, a guy on a public board I'm chatting with, his theory - in the sense of the definitions I posted above.


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 429
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 11:57:19 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		I want the 23 pages to be de-classified!   and I want it NOW!

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 430
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 11:57:40 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline 		And I advised you to read the thread again.

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 431
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 11:58:57 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth
Oh, btw the word theory has more than one definition. At Dictionary.com I found these two:

6.contemplation or speculation. 7.guess or conjecture.

These definitions are not accepted by philosophers of science.



True, but I'm not asking scientists for their professional opinion, I'm asking you, a guy on a public board I'm chatting with, his theory - in the sense of the definitions I posted above.



well are you capable of identifying a demo;ition when you see it?  Do you know what you are looking at here?




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 432
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 12:00:07 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		I know this is hard for you to accept, but the evidence clearly shows it was Mothman acting alone, flying over the grassy knoll with a single bullet.



< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 3/7/2010 12:03:34 PM >

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 433
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 12:01:48 PM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

they wont ever look at that or admit that they did.

that is why they keep pleading ignorance to what has been shown time and time again


I did, it was really amusing, but it's still a load of crap. There is nothing there which cannot be explained by the office equipment etc exploding. None of the flashes are anywhere near to what we would be seeing if explosives were detonated. Further, if you look above the falling building, there are more of those flashes.

I know you really, really believe this nonsense, RO, but it's nothing but paranoia that any sane person is going to see right through. It's sad really, I recommend getting away from your pc for a while, go for a walk, it's really nice out. And for God's sake get back on the meds.


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 434
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 12:02:30 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I know this is hard for you to accept, but the evidence clearly shows it was Mothman acting alone, flying over the grassy knoll with a single bullet.

http://img262.imageshack.us/i/mothman7zf.jpg



isn't it amazing that Kennedy wanted to get rid of the Federal Reserve?

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 435
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 12:04:10 PM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I know this is hard for you to accept, but the evidence clearly shows it was Mothman acting alone, flying over the grassy knoll with a single bullet.

http://img262.imageshack.us/i/mothman7zf.jpg



Master, the link is broken. I think you'll need more than that to convince the nutballs. As it is, I have my doubts about it being Mothman. Personally I think it was Conspiracyman, no pics, sorry.


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 436
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 12:06:22 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I know this is hard for you to accept, but the evidence clearly shows it was Mothman acting alone, flying over the grassy knoll with a single bullet.





isn't it amazing that Kennedy wanted to get rid of the Federal Reserve?



Come on, wake up, sheeple----Kennedy IS Mothman!



(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 437
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 12:07:01 PM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth
There is nothing there which cannot be explained by the office equipment etc exploding.

On the contrary, there is, and I am not talking about flashes. Besides, there ain't much office equipment that can explode.

(in reply to zephyroftheNorth)
Profile   Post #: 438
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 12:08:40 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		hoard GOLD!

hoard SILVER!

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 439
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/7/2010 12:09:15 PM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth
Oh, btw the word theory has more than one definition. At Dictionary.com I found these two:

6.contemplation or speculation. 7.guess or conjecture.

These definitions are not accepted by philosophers of science.



True, but I'm not asking scientists for their professional opinion, I'm asking you, a guy on a public board I'm chatting with, his theory - in the sense of the definitions I posted above.



well are you capable of identifying a demo;ition when you see it?  Do you know what you are looking at here?





RO, if I wanted the opinion of a total paranoid schizo, I would go to my local mental hospital. My comment was directed at Rule, who at least has some remaining shreds of sanity. So no offense but please stop giving me these paranoid fantasies....and get out more, you've been inhaling oxygen deficient air too long.


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 440
Page:   <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094