Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 2:39:14 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

So the reason that Bush got to run an oil company as springboard to becoming President was that he was lucky enough to be chosen by our Queen to be the one to exercise her mineral rights in Texas?

E


its all commerce....  the queen holds legal rights through the federal government, eminent domain etc.

You do remember a few years back when I posted the entry into the UK parliment registry of the writing legislation for the us social security?




The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997
Well folks, I don't have to look any further for proof positive, concerning our subjection to England and what ever monarch is sitting. Of course I will continue looking, but will you believe the following document obtained from the Queen's own web site. I was told about the possible existence of this by the Informer, he was told by someone else. Yep, it's there in black and white, read "Schedule 1, Article 14, sections 15, 16 and 17. There are other revealing parts, but in the above sections the United States is declared to be a territory of Great Britain and that we are subject to the Queen. As always I do not take things out of context, but read the whole thing so you will have no doubt.

James

Statutory Instrument 1997 No. 1778

The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997

---------------------------------------

Crown Copyright 1997

All Crown Copyrights are reserved. The following are concessions. Individuals are authorised to download this text to file or printer for their own individual use. Reproduction of the text for the purpose of developing and publishing value-added products is also allowed, without prior permission or charge, provided reproduction is accurate, not malicious and is accompanied by an acknowledgment of Crown copyright.

Any other proposed reproduction requires the consent of the Copyright Unit at Her Majesty's Stationery Office. For more details on the reproduction of Crown and Parliamentary copyright material, see the latest Her Majesty's Stationery Office Dear Publisher letter.

The text of this Internet version of the Statutory Instrument has been prepared to reflect the text as it was Made. The authoritative version is in printed form and is published by The Stationery Office Limited as the The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997, ISBN 0 11 0646983, ú2.40 sterling. For details of how to obtain a printed copy see How to obtain The Stationery Office Limited titles.

-------------------------------------------------
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS
-------------------------------------------------

1997 No. 1778

SOCIAL SECURITY

The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997

Made 22nd July 1997

Coming into 1st September force 1997

At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 22nd day of July 1997

Present,

The Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in Council

Whereas at London on the 13th February 1984 an Agreement on social security between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement") and an Administrative Agreement for the implementation of the Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the Administrative Agreement")[1] were signed on behalf of those Governments and effect was given to the Agreement by the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1984 (hereinafter referred to as "the Principal Order")[2]:

And Whereas at London on 6th June 1996 a Supplementary Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America (which Supplementary Agreement is set out in Schedule 1 to this Order and is hereinafter referred to as "the Supplementary Agreement") amending the Agreement and a Supplementary Administrative Agreement amending the Administrative Agreement (which Supplementary Administrative Agreement is set out in Schedule 2 to this Order and is hereinafter referred to as "the Supplementary Administrative Agreement")[3] were signed on behalf of those Governments:

And Whereas by Article 3 of the Supplementary Agreement it is provided that the Supplementary Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the third month following the month in which each Government has received from the other Government written notification that all statutory and constitutional requirements have been complied with for entry into force of the Supplementary Agreement:

And Whereas by Article 2 of the Supplementary Administrative Agreement it is provided that the Supplementary Administrative Agreement shall enter into force on the date of entry into force of the Supplementary Agreement:

And Whereas written notification in accordance with Article 3 of the Supplementary Agreement was received by each Government on 20th June 1997 and accordingly the Supplementary Agreement and the Supplementary Administrative Agreement enter into force on the 1st September 1997:

And Whereas by section 179(1)(a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992[4] it is provided that Her Majesty may by Order in Council make provision for modifying or adapting that Act and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992[5] in their application to cases affected by agreements with other Governments providing for reciprocity in matters specified in the said section:

Now, therefore, Her Majesty, in pursuance of section 179(1)(a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and of all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows: -

Citation and commencement
1. This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997.

Modification of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 and amendment of the Principal Order
2. The Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 shall be modified and the Principal Order shall be amended so as to give effect to the Agreement as modified by the Supplementary Agreement set out in Schedule 1 to this Order and to the Administrative Agreement as modified by the Supplementary Administrative Agreement set out in Schedule 2 to this Order, so far as the same relate to England, Wales and Scotland.

Amendment of Order
3. The reference to the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1984 shall be omitted in the Schedule to the Social Security (Reciprocal Agreements) Order 1988[6] and in Schedules 2 and 3 to the Social Security (Reciprocal Agreements) Order 1995[7].

N.H. Nicholls
Clerk of the Privy Council

SCHEDULE 1
Article 2

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT AMENDING THE AGREEMENT ON SOCIAL SECURITY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America;



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

thats only an excerpt the rest is here.

http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/thequeen.htm

anyone interested I expect its still on open parlimentary records


lifes bitch and then you die!



< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/2/2010 2:54:57 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 2:53:49 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/SI/si1997/19971778.htm

This is the full text of the Order from the UK government website where all legislation is listed. The Order is a revision, to take account of changing circumstances, to an earlier Act whereby provisions for social security coverage in the UK and US are made reciprocal such that a Brit in the US or an American over here can get social security as long as he has paid contributions at home or in the other country.

There is no mention whatever of the US being declared to be a territory of the UK nor subject to our Queen.

?

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 2:57:48 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
nowhere does it say any such a thing, you fucking stooge. where territory is defined (for us, it means OURS)!!!!!!!!!!!

" 1. "Territory" means,

as regards the United States, the States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, yadda yadda yadda regarding UK territorial possessions.......


you fucking wastrel. hows that law working out for you, who cannot read at a 3rd grade level of comprehension?



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 3:01:19 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/SI/si1997/19971778.htm

This is the full text of the Order from the UK government website where all legislation is listed. The Order is a revision, to take account of changing circumstances, to an earlier Act whereby provisions for social security coverage in the UK and US are made reciprocal such that a Brit in the US or an American over here can get social security as long as he has paid contributions at home or in the other country.

There is no mention whatever of the US being declared to be a territory of the UK nor subject to our Queen.

?

E



come on!

it goes without saying does it not?

How can the queen so much as even open her yap about anything that goes on the US government much less write legislation without the US being a territory or the reverse?

There is only one possible way and that is if the 2 countries are connected by an umbilical cord pumping the same blood.

Could mao se tung for instance do the same thing with the US?

I know its a hard pill to swallow but its where the proverbial bear shit in the buckwheat.




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 3:02:04 PM   
SaintIntensity


Posts: 177
Joined: 5/25/2007
Status: offline
You have to love his little claims of victory when he posts something SO easy to refuse a stunned squirrel could do it - he is cracking up and his delusions are worsening

54 and no job, no life like I said earlier

be sad if he wasnt such a nasty, pathetic, egotistical little twat

leave Mr Fusion to his deranged rants - he wont last long - Occam's Razor is sharp - I hope it opens something important

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 3:03:06 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

nowhere does it say any such a thing, you fucking stooge. where territory is defined (for us, it means OURS)!!!!!!!!!!!

" 1. "Territory" means,

as regards the United States, the States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, yadda yadda yadda regarding UK territorial possessions.......


you fucking wastrel. hows that law working out for you, who cannot read at a 3rd grade level of comprehension?




that US territory ron not UK


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 3:04:35 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SaintIntensity

You have to love his little claims of victory when he posts something SO easy to refuse a stunned squirrel could do it - he is cracking up and his delusions are worsening

54 and no job, no life like I said earlier

be sad if he wasnt such a nasty, pathetic, egotistical little twat

leave Mr Fusion to his deranged rants - he wont last long - Occam's Razor is sharp - I hope it opens something important


O cramits razor

give it a rest before you hurt yourself


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to SaintIntensity)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 3:07:36 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
Article 2
This Supplementary Administrative Agreement shall enter into force on the date of entry into force of the Supplementary Agreement of this date amending the Agreement.



DONE at London on 6th June 1996 in duplicate.


FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND:

William Marsden,
(Americas Director, FCO)


FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:


Timothy E. Deal,
(Minister, Embassy of the United States of America)



Its an amending agreement to an earlier agreement - its a contract if you will, which requires the agreement of both parties, those being the UK and US. It is not a decree of the Queen except insofar as it is a decree to the UK government to make it happen. I would not be surprised if a similar or related document wasnt produced over there for signature by both parties too in order to have it enacted.

Also note, in law "it goes without saying" is not of very useful application when it comes to legislation, the purpose of which is to ensure it goes because its been said.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 3:17:50 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Article 2
This Supplementary Administrative Agreement shall enter into force on the date of entry into force of the Supplementary Agreement of this date amending the Agreement.



DONE at London on 6th June 1996 in duplicate.


FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND:

William Marsden,
(Americas Director, FCO)


FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:


Timothy E. Deal,
(Minister, Embassy of the United States of America)



Its an amending agreement to an earlier agreement - its a contract if you will, which requires the agreement of both parties, those being the UK and US. It is not a decree of the Queen except insofar as it is a decree to the UK government to make it happen. I would not be surprised if a similar or related document wasnt produced over there for signature by both parties too in order to have it enacted.

Also note, in law "it goes without saying" is not of very useful application when it comes to legislation, the purpose of which is to ensure it goes because its been said.

E


fine then its an implied trust. LOL

you are probly the only of 3 other people who would understand that.

thats what a decree is. see the bold then look below, the decree of the sovereign makes law  IT IS LAW, slaves and chattel cannot decree or make law.

I make treaties with the us and they either reject them and it back to me and its back to the drawing board or accept most of them as the supreme court has determined that the king did give us sovereignty that which canada and you all do not have.

Not that the sovereignty matters for most because they took it back with the 14th amendment and commercial treaties that the people here are bound as a matter of the 14th.

small world


< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/2/2010 3:24:53 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 3:28:51 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
FFS RO. The Queen is not decreeing anything to anyone except the UK government OK? The UK will have such reciprocal agreements with a whole load of countries, both former colonies/conquests and otherwise - its a sensible agreement to have for the protection of one's citizens. But the Queen cannot decree that the US make such arrangements any more than she might decree that (for instance) Argentina make them - it requires the agreement of the other party to make it happen, which is then embodied in an Order such as this example so that it becomes enacted as UK law. The other party will then embody the agreement in a similar fashion according to its particular system such that it becomes enacted as law in that jurisdiction too.

If the Queen had the power that you suggest to decree the laws of the US, such arrangements should not be required and no agreement could be possible still less required - she could simply decree it to be so. Of note here is that the Queen doesnt have such power even in the UK, let alone anywhere else in the world.

E



_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 3:56:56 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

FFS RO. The Queen is not decreeing anything to anyone except the UK government OK? The UK will have such reciprocal agreements with a whole load of countries, both former colonies/conquests and otherwise - its a sensible agreement to have for the protection of one's citizens. But the Queen cannot decree that the US make such arrangements any more than she might decree that (for instance) Argentina make them - it requires the agreement of the other party to make it happen, which is then embodied in an Order such as this example so that it becomes enacted as UK law. The other party will then embody the agreement in a similar fashion according to its particular system such that it becomes enacted as law in that jurisdiction too.

If the Queen had the power that you suggest to decree the laws of the US, such arrangements should not be required and no agreement could be possible still less required - she could simply decree it to be so. Of note here is that the Queen doesnt have such power even in the UK, let alone anywhere else in the world.

E




it depends on how ther treaties are written.

Its no different than what we did to the american indians here.

They are lawfully a sovereign nation yet for the most part whatever the federal government says goes.

What are the american indians? a territory gained by conquest, mostly.

If you look at law in england as it changes its only 20 years later and we in america have the americanized version "being implemented" here.  The shit rolls down hill.

The bottom line is that the federal corporation known as the UNITED STATES has the authority to make private contracts and you do not know what contracts may have been made with the UK.

That decree could have a lot more weight than you believe.  THe changes were made here and its easy to say well we agreed because the bottom line is that if the queen said it no one is going to go against it.

There are so many layers involved just where does that decree begin and national sovereignty leave off?

Its all done through commercial, that which the king did not cede in fact claimed. 

What authority by the us constitution does the feds have over the states?  commercial.

Add that all up and its one big happy family.

The queen has title or interest in I would bet you more than 65% of the earth.

.0001% tax and you could support all of england.

That and you must be fully aware that there are 2 sides to the law.

there is public consumption and private.  Can you speak for the private?  None of us can, but we can speak to cause and effect or a means to an end.

anyone gets caught up in the middle just gets spun around in circles.






< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/2/2010 3:59:37 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 4:16:17 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
I'm sorry RO. You can sometimes be interesting, raising questions and putting different slants on things, but here you are making no sense whatever, either in your initial contention (apparently that the world is run by the extended family of European royalty) or in this current point (apparently that the British Queen owns and/or rules the US); each proposition has been dismissed systematically by reference to the very source materials held to support them.

As you may know I am studying for a law degree, having already over the course of my career amassed quite substantial but particular legal knowledge and practical know how in the English jurisdiction. As a result perhaps, I find your contentions and arguments interesting but so far I am afraid there is not one such that appears to be supported by the available evidence but rather, as in the current instance, each is undermined and entirely disproven by that very evidence.

I would therefore suggest, in the politest way possible, that should you ever have occasion to enter into any sort of legal proceedings, you recruit a qualified lawyer and in no circumstances act for yourself in any way, for I am afraid that your interpretations of the law have been demonstrated to be dangerously erroneous on so very many occasions that this regularity must infer a systematic pattern of misinterpretation that should be damaging to your position in such a situation.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 4:24:31 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Real, since you clearly cannot understand plain English, I will attempt to explain this on a third grade level just for you.

quote:

The Paris Peace Treaty of 1783

In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.

It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America, to forget all past misunderstandings and differences that have unhappily interrupted the good correspondence and friendship which they mutually wish to restore, and to establish such a beneficial and satisfactory intercourse , between the two countries (this acknowledges, for all parties, that the United States is an independent country) upon the ground of reciprocal advantages and mutual convenience as may promote and secure to both perpetual peace and harmony; and having for this desirable end already laid the foundation of peace and reconciliation by the Provisional Articles signed at Paris on the 30th of November 1782, by the commissioners empowered on each part, which articles were agreed to be inserted in and constitute the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States, but which treaty was not to be concluded until terms of peace should be agreed upon between Great Britain and France and his Britannic Majesty should be ready to conclude such treaty accordingly; and the treaty between Great Britain and France having since been concluded, his Britannic Majesty and the United States of America, in order to carry into full effect the Provisional Articles above mentioned, according to the tenor thereof, have constituted and appointed, that is to say his Britannic Majesty on his part, David Hartley, Esqr., member of the Parliament of Great Britain, and the said United States on their part, John Adams, Esqr., late a commissioner of the United States of America at the court of Versailles, late delegate in Congress from the state of Massachusetts, and chief justice of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary of the said United States to their high mightinesses the States General of the United Netherlands; Benjamin Franklin, Esqr., late delegate in Congress from the state of Pennsylvania, president of the convention of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary from the United States of America at the court of Versailles; John Jay, Esqr., late president of Congress and chief justice of the state of New York, and minister plenipotentiary from the said United States at the court of Madrid; to be plenipotentiaries for the concluding and signing the present definitive treaty; who after having reciprocally communicated their respective full powers have agreed upon and confirmed the following articles.

Article 1:

His Brittanic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz., New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and independent states, that he treats with them as such, and for himself, his heirs, and successors, relinquishes all claims to the government, propriety, and territorial rights of the same and every part thereof.

The king of England acknowledges ( ac·knowl·edge Pronunciation: [\ik-ˈnä-lij, ak-\ Function: transitive verb Inflected Form(s): ac·knowl·edged; ac·knowl·edg·ing Etymology: ac- (as in accord) + knowledge
Date: 15th century] 1 : to recognize the rights, authority, or status of 2 : to disclose knowledge of or agreement with 3 a : to express gratitude or obligation for <acknowledge a gift> b : to take notice of <failed to acknowledge my greeting> c : to make known the receipt of <acknowledge a letter>
4 : to recognize as genuine or valid <acknowledge a debt>)
or recognizes that the United States to be free sovereign and independent, and relinquishes (Main Entry: re·lin·quish Pronunciation: \ri-ˈliŋ-kwish, -ˈlin-\ [Function: transitive verb Etymology: Middle English relinquisshen, from Anglo-French relinquiss-, stem of relinquir, from Latin relinquere to leave behind, from re- + linquere to leave — more at loan Date: 15th century] 1 : to withdraw or retreat from : leave behind 2 : give up <relinquish a title> 3 a : to stop holding physically : release <slowly relinquished his grip on the bar> b : to give over possession or control of : yield <few leaders willingly relinquish power>) simply stated that the king gives up all claims to the government, propriety, and TERRITORIAL rights, or territory (territory (from the word 'terra', meaning 'land') is a defined area (including land and waters), considered to be a possession of a person, organization, institution, animal, state)


Article 2:

And that all disputes which might arise in future on the subject of the boundaries of the said United States may be prevented, it is hereby agreed and declared, that the following are and shall be their boundaries, viz.; from the northwest angle of Nova Scotia, viz., that nagle which is formed by a line drawn due north from the source of St. Croix River to the highlands; along the said highlands which divide those rivers that empty themselves into the river St. Lawrence, from those which fall into the Atlantic Ocean, to the northwesternmost head of Connecticut River; thence down along the middle of that river to the forty-fifth degree of north latitude; from thence by a line due west on said latitude until it strikes the river Iroquois or Cataraquy; thence along the middle of said river into Lake Ontario; through the middle of said lake until it strikes the communication by water between that lake and Lake Erie; thence along the middle of said communication into Lake Erie, through the middle of said lake until it arrives at the water communication between that lake and Lake Huron; thence along the middle of said water communication into Lake Huron, thence through the middle of said lake to the water communication between that lake and Lake Superior; thence through Lake Superior northward of the Isles Royal and Phelipeaux to the Long Lake; thence through the middle of said Long Lake and the water communication between it and the Lake of the Woods, to the said Lake of the Woods; thence through the said lake to the most northwesternmost point thereof, and from thence on a due west course to the river Mississippi; thence by a line to be drawn along the middle of the said river Mississippi until it shall intersect the northernmost part of the thirty-first degree of north latitude, South, by a line to be drawn due east from the determination of the line last mentioned in the latitude of thirty-one degrees of the equator, to the middle of the river Apalachicola or Catahouche; thence along the middle thereof to its junction with the Flint River, thence straight to the head of Saint Mary's River; and thence down along the middle of Saint Mary's River to the Atlantic Ocean; east, by a line to be drawn along the middle of the river Saint Croix, from its mouth in the Bay of Fundy to its source, and from its source directly north to the aforesaid highlands which divide the rivers that fall into the Atlantic Ocean from those which fall into the river Saint Lawrence; comprehending all islands within twenty leagues of any part of the shores of the United States, and lying between lines to be drawn due east from the points where the aforesaid boundaries between Nova Scotia on the one part and East Florida on the other shall, respectively, touch the Bay of Fundy and the Atlantic Ocean, excepting such islands as now are or heretofore have been within the limits of the said province of Nova Scotia.

This explains the agreed upon boundaries of the United States and possessions (meaning land) of Great Britain, meaning Canada.

Article 3:

It is agreed that the people of the United States shall continue to enjoy unmolested the right to take fish of every kind on the Grand Bank and on all the other banks of Newfoundland, also in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence and at all other places in the sea, where the inhabitants of both countries used at any time heretofore to fish. And also that the inhabitants of the United States shall have liberty to take fish of every kind on such part of the coast of Newfoundland as British fishermen shall use, (but not to dry or cure the same on that island) and also on the coasts, bays and creeks of all other of his Brittanic Majesty's dominions in America; and that the American fishermen shall have liberty to dry and cure fish in any of the unsettled bays, harbors, and creeks of Nova Scotia, Magdalen Islands, and Labrador, so long as the same shall remain unsettled, but so soon as the same or either of them shall be settled, it shall not be lawful for the said fishermen to dry or cure fish at such settlement without a previous agreement for that purpose with the inhabitants, proprietors, or possessors of the ground.

Article 4:

It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.

: This means legal contracted (con·tract Pronunciation: \vt 2a & vi 1 usually ˈkän-ˌtrakt, others usually kən-ˈ\[ Function: verb Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French or Latin; Middle French contracter to agree upon, from Latin contractus Date: 14th century] transitive verb 1 a : to bring on oneself especially inadvertently : incur <contracting debts> b : to become affected with <contract pneumonia>
2 a : to establish or undertake by contract <contract a job>) debts, meaning the debts between two people or people and banks. NOT WAR DEBT, the US did not have to repay the King Of England anything. The ONLY example of something like this is Haiti being forced to repay war debts to France after Haiti won its war of independence, and it took them until the 1930's to do it.

Article 5:

It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects; and also of the estates, rights, and properties of persons resident in districts in the possession on his Majesty's arms and who have not borne arms against the said United States. And that persons of any other decription shall have free liberty to go to any part or parts of any of the thirteen United States and therein to remain twelve months unmolested in their endeavors to obtain the restitution of such of their estates, rights, and properties as may have been confiscated; and that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states a reconsideration and revision of all acts or laws regarding the premises, so as to render the said laws or acts perfectly consistent not only with justice and equity but with that spirit of conciliation which on the return of the blessings of peace should universally prevail. And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price (where any has been given) which such persons may have paid on purchasing any of the said lands, rights, or properties since the confiscation.
And it is agreed that all persons who have any interest in confiscated lands, either by debts, marriage settlements, or otherwise, shall meet with no lawful impediment in the prosecution of their just rights.

Article 6:

That there shall be no future confiscations made nor any prosecutions commenced against any person or persons for, or by reason of, the part which he or they may have taken in the present war, and that no person shall on that account suffer any future loss or damage, either in his person, liberty, or property; and that those who may be in confinement on such charges at the time of the ratification of the treaty in America shall be immediately set at liberty, and the prosecutions so commenced be discontinued.

Article 7:

There shall be a firm and perpetual peace between his Brittanic Majesty and the said states, and between the subjects of the one and the citizens of the other, wherefore all hostilities both by sea and land shall from henceforth cease. All prisoners on both sides shall be set at liberty, and his Brittanic Majesty shall with all convenient speed, and without causing any destruction, or carrying away any Negroes or other property of the American inhabitants, withdraw all his armies, garrisons, and fleets from the said United States, and from every post, place, and harbor within the same; leaving in all fortifications, the American artilery that may be therein; and shall also order and cause all archives, records, deeds, and papers belonging to any of the said states, or their citizens, which in the course of the war may have fallen into the hands of his officers, to be forthwith restored and delivered to the proper states and persons to whom they belong.

Article 8:

The navigation of the river Mississippi, from its source to the ocean, shall forever remain free and open to the subjects of Great Britain and the citizens of the United States.

Article 9:

In case it should so happen that any place or territory belonging to Great Britain or to the United States should have been conquered by the arms of either from the other before the arrival of the said Provisional Articles in America, it is agreed that the same shall be restored without difficulty and without requiring any compensation.

Article 10:

The solemn ratifications of the present treaty expedited in good and due form shall be exchanged between the contracting parties in the space of six months or sooner, if possible, to be computed from the day of the signatures of the present treaty. In witness whereof we the undersigned, their ministers plenipotentiary, have in their name and in virtue of our full powers, signed with our hands the present definitive treaty and caused the seals of our arms to be affixed thereto.

Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.

D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)



Now, I hope this explains everything to you, since you seem to have some problem understanding English. Perhaps English is a second language to you, which would explain how you have come up with some of your outlandish and absurd ideas.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 5:05:33 PM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
Whoops, looks like it was a quote error by Real.


< Message edited by thornhappy -- 3/2/2010 5:06:45 PM >

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 5:07:43 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
ROFLMAO!!!

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 5:09:25 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

ROFLMAO!!!



Would you please do that again   ?

_____________________________



(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 5:27:42 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

what the hell do you think winning the war is kiddo?   Its when one country takes over another.  YOu know its really not that complicated, germany loses war and loses sovereignty, japan loses war and loses sovereignty.  

This is like high school basics.   Did you ever have a civic class in high school?



Didnt win the war, didnt win the war, you sond like some moronic parrot. Lets put this too you, suppose the war ( fighting ) was considered a stalemate. Then, without "winning" the war, America won her freedom. I realise this is complicated for you, but take your time and get back to me.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 5:32:51 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Be careful what you ask for Polite?.....who, their right mind ,would want to hear from him?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 5:40:33 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
even so, I'd be interested in hearing the proposal as to how the Queen might hold mineral rights over Texas (to grant to her distant cousin Mr Bush), which as well as not being in the Union at the time of the WoI, is as I understand it something of a special case when it comes to its relationship with the the Union even to this day, such that any such argument should be fascinating to hear.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/2/2010 5:40:36 PM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
You're a slut fer bewbage, ya know that, don'cha kitten?

Just today I was reading about the differences between schizophrenia and a profound, psychotic manic state...I think it was the manic state that can have folks finding wondrous relationships existing between completely unrelated things.


(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.117