calamitysandra
Posts: 1682
Joined: 3/17/2006 Status: offline
|
Something else just occurred to me. The dogma that my rights stop where the rights of somebody else begin is often bandied around on this forum. So, at which point do the child's right to the best possible education supersede the parents rights? And I honestly have trouble reconciling writing, reading, math with the best possible education. Another point is the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The USA as well as Germany are signatories to this. It requires the state to act in the best interests of a child, and requires in Article 28 to make at least primary education compulsory. I believe that those US states which have no guidelines, and more important, no oversight and/or compulsory testing are in violation of this. Let me state it again. If parents are truly qualified, and are willing to bring in second parties on subjects they are not qualified enough on, and the necessary local infrastructures are in place, then I see nothing wrong with homeschooling, provided it is in the children's best interest. I do however believe, that oversight is an absolute necessity, especially in light of the Convention cited above, and the resulting requirement of the state to act in the child's interest. I also believe, that homeschooling is not a truly viable option for Germany. It would require that the necessary infrastructure be build, an overseeing entity be created, as well as material be developed. The first two would fall to the state, the money coming out of the education budget, thus taking away from the vast majority of children. Developing materials would be something the appropriate industries would have to pick up, and I doubt that the German home school market would be big enough to make this viable.
< Message edited by calamitysandra -- 3/7/2010 11:20:59 AM >
_____________________________
"Whenever people are laughing, they are generally not killing one another" Alan Alda
|