LafayetteLady
Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007 From: Northern New Jersey Status: offline
|
FR- I'm not against homeschooling, and in this country in most places, you don't need a "reason" to choose to do so. You do, however, have the responsibility of teaching the children what is necessary for their future. In other words, you need to follow some type of standardized curriculum. Children need to learn specific things in order to function in society. When standardized testing is given, it doesn't include history, it doesn't include religion. Standardized testing includes language and reading skills and mathmatics. They have also begun to include some science, but that doesn't include evolution or creationism. So on the one hand you have the concept that parents have the right to teach their children as they see fit. So what happens in families where they believe women should serve men (some of the more extreme religious sects, for example)? Should they be free to not teach their female children the basic skills of reading, writing and mathmatics? By saying that parents should have the right to teach what they see fit, you are espousing that concept. But the issue here is not whether or not a parent's right to decide what their child learns. The issue is whether or not a parent's desire to have their children shielded from certain aspects of a public school education warrants them seeking asylum in another country. This case is not simply based on religious ideology, because it is mentioned the parents are also concerned about bullying, although if their children haven't been to public school, one has to wonder why they think their children would be bullied. As LadyEllen pointed out, within Europe, families are free to relocate to several different countries without any problems that would arise immigrating to the USA. LE also mentioned that several of those European countries permit home schooling. The group that helped the parents are from the USA, and they have their own agenda that they are trying to propel forward through the publicity they get with this family. Because there are options available to this family to be free of the "persecution" they claim to be experiencing without having to immigrate to the United State, they should not be given asylum. They could have been free from that persecution by simply moving to France. Many people have responded with a parent's right to teach their children as they see fit, however, not many of those people addressed whether or not that right rises to the level of granting asylum. Asylum was conceived to protect people from real fears and threats, not because you aren't happy with the school system of your country. Had this been from a country where the females weren't permitted to attend school at all, perhaps it would be different, but that isn't the case. If we allow this family to stay because they want to home school their children in the manner in which they see fit, what contribution will that family be making to this country? Are their children learning to speak english? Because certainly, if they are going to live in this country, they must teach their children how to communicate in this country, so we are dictating what they teach their children as well as Germany, if in a different way.
|