Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 8:39:40 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

States or municipalities shouldn't be restricting rights.
Restricting First Amendment rights or Freedom of the Press wouldn't be tolerated for one minute! I don't understand why people have tolerated this nonsense for so long.


The difference is that firearms are potentially a threat to other citizens.

When free speech or freedom of the press poses a threat to other citizens, it is also restricted.

No reason firearms should be exempt from this reasonable approach.



this is fucking rich!

free speech posing a threat


Yup.

It's why we have libel laws.

Not to mention classified information.

Both "infringe" upon free speech, because of the potential harm they present.


thank you very much, therefore there is no need for legislation on the issue, just like we have murder laws therefore there is no need for gun legislation.

Of course there is no laws against shooting yourself in the foot.





_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 8:41:58 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		You are an idiot---we already HAVE legislation for both.

Go check your law book.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 8:48:29 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

You are an idiot---we already HAVE legislation for both.

Go check your law book.


you are an idiot because you are completely clueless to the distinction.

Oh been there done that bought the library.





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/5/2010 8:49:01 PM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 8:53:11 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		This may help:

http://www.dictionary.com


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:04:50 PM   
FatDomDaddy


Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline 		Fast Reply...

Lest we forget, let us revisit what started this...

A 74 year old man, a law abiding citizen, named Otis McDonald, living in one of the dangerous and violent places in Chicago wanted to keep a registered fire-arm in his home for personal protection but the city would rather only non law abiding citizens have them.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:06:51 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		No.

The city doesn't want them to have hand guns.

Long guns are fine and legal.

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:08:45 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

This may help:

http://www.dictionary.com





more raid for the bug fest!

The mainstream distinction between lawful and legal is that one deals with substance and the other form.

bills in the fuckign mail


oh and thanks for the worthless dictionary btw








< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/5/2010 9:09:22 PM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:10:47 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		Point is speech and firearm restrictions.

Both are restricted, by law, to prevent harm to others.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:13:44 PM   
zenny


Posts: 275
Joined: 2/13/2008
Status: offline 		Yes, laws are in place to protect people even when their purpose is explicitly (or not) stated otherwise.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:16:38 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Point is speech and firearm restrictions.

Both are restricted, by law, to prevent harm to others.



only for the idiots that consented to be governed.

Of course it does not change the fact its only code with the force of law.

you need to either take 5 minutes out life and study or hang it up man.

Perfect example of why this country so so fucked up, people dont even know the fucking basics.






_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:18:02 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		None of which has anything at all to do with the point made.

Take your change of subject elsewhere.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:19:11 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

Yes, laws are in place to protect people even when their purpose is explicitly (or not) stated otherwise.




Ok well I will hang 10 pounds of gold around your neck and give you all the applicable law toss your ass in a ghetto and see how much protection you get from your law.


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:21:44 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

None of which has anything at all to do with the point made.

Take your change of subject elsewhere.



see there you go again.

here is more raid for the bugfest.

As the consented you do not have 2nd amendment rights, not that anyone can explain it to you in 100 years because you dont understand the difference between rights and privileges either.

but enjoy





_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:26:01 PM   
zenny


Posts: 275
Joined: 2/13/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

Yes, laws are in place to protect people even when their purpose is explicitly (or not) stated otherwise.




Ok well I will hang 10 pounds of gold around your neck and give you all the applicable law toss your ass in a ghetto and see how much protection you get from your law.



My post was heavily sarcastic. Also, the police are not under obligation to protect anyone thanks to that ole' supreme court ruling.. Castle Rock vs. Gonzales iirc

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:28:52 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:



ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:



States or municipalities shouldn't be restricting rights.
Restricting First Amendment rights or Freedom of the Press wouldn't be tolerated for one minute! I don't understand why people have tolerated this nonsense for so long.


The difference is that firearms are potentially a threat to other citizens.

When free speech or freedom of the press poses a threat to other citizens, it is also restricted.

No reason firearms should be exempt from this reasonable approach.


HERE is the point.

None of your babble addresses it.

Insult all you want. That's the point.




< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 3/5/2010 9:30:05 PM >

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:31:42 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

Yes, laws are in place to protect people even when their purpose is explicitly (or not) stated otherwise.




Ok well I will hang 10 pounds of gold around your neck and give you all the applicable law toss your ass in a ghetto and see how much protection you get from your law.



My post was heavily sarcastic. Also, the police are not under obligation to protect anyone thanks to that ole' supreme court ruling.. Castle Rock vs. Gonzales iirc



Oh... well right you are.

They work for the corporate court.  Thats just a another one of the misdirections, and all attorneys are foriegn agents, and all legislation is, is a way to circumvent due process of Law.

Sorry I didnt catch that, good point.




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:37:03 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Point is speech and firearm restrictions.

Both are restricted, by law, to prevent harm to others.



only for the idiots that consented to be governed.

Of course it does not change the fact its only code with the force of law.

you need to either take 5 minutes out life and study or hang it up man.

Perfect example of why this country so so fucked up, people dont even know the fucking basics.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


HERE is the point.

None of your babble addresses it.

Insult all you want. That's the point.



wrong again, there was the point.

I planted an axe right between your eyes and you failed to see it.




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:40:50 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		Here's the thread you're on:

quote:

Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights?


Your head has been up your ass so long, you don't miss it.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/5/2010 9:49:05 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Here's the thread you're on:

quote:

Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights?


Your head has been up your ass so long, you don't miss it.


Oh well my apologies, I thought this was about law, I was not aware this thread was restricted to the clueless consenting.






< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/5/2010 9:50:00 PM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? - 3/6/2010 12:34:31 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

No.

The city doesn't want them to have hand guns.

Long guns are fine and legal.


Good luck getting an FOID card to buy one in Cook County.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Supreme Court leaning towards extending gun rights? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.111