Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/3/2010 10:20:29 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline 		Starbucks asks not to be center of gun debate


First off, my only problem with Starbucks is that they burn their beans (that's why the coffee tastes the same no matter where you go).  As a company though, they have a certain "liberal" reputation.  Maybe it is just the stereotype of their customers rubbing off (though I'm one of their customers too, on an afternoon when my ass is just dragging), but it is there.

This reputation seems to have led to the stores being chosen for open carry of guns demonstrations and a resulting move by anti-gun activists to demand the chain ban guns in their outlets.  Starbucks wants no part of it.  It seems like a smart corporate decision to me.

Should they take a stand?

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.

Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/3/2010 10:57:59 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, launched a petition drive demanding that the company "offer espresso shots, not gunshots" and declare its coffeehouses "gun-free zones." And Wednesday, that group delivered 28,000 signatures to the coffee giant's headquarters in Seattle.


This quote is taken from your cite.
Isn't the Brady campaign to prevent gun violence a Republican organization started by a Republican mouth piece for a Republican president?
Why is it that the conservative Republicans want to destroy the 2nd ammendment?

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 4:45:23 AM   
eyesopened


Posts: 2798
Joined: 6/12/2006
From: Tampa, FL
Status: offline 		I believe a business has the right to allow any legal activity it wishes on their owned property.  I think their rights could get murky depending on the language in each individual lease if the stores operate on leased property.

What I found interesting in the article is the concept that open-carry is potentially more harmful than concealed carry.  I fail to see that logic.  I'd much rather be able to see who has a gun and who is reaching for that gun. 

I have formed the opinion that guns and motorcycles are phallic symbols deep in the psyche of the majority of humans.  That could explain why such things are either loved or feared but rarely is there ambivalence.

Many male primates use the display of their erection as intimidation, some primates also throw feces.  I'm not convinced we have evolved very far.....

_____________________________

Proudly owned by InkedMaster. He is the one i obey, serve, honor and love.

No one is honored for what they've received. Honor is the reward for what has been given.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 4:53:25 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		I think being able to kill somebody who looks at you funny rather than throwing shit at them is progress, though not necessarily a good sort. Transferring a part of your anatomy's role to a symbol takes a degree of conceptualisation the lower primates don't have, after all. Even chimps need another chimp to whisk up a hand shandy over instead of being able to close their eyes and use their imagination, after all.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to eyesopened)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 5:03:54 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Even chimps need another chimp to whisk up a hand shandy over instead of being able to close their eyes and use their imagination, after all.


A trip to the zoo might go a long way towards disabusing you of this ignorance.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 5:47:00 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		They can? I stand corrected.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 6:17:34 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline 		Rich, they're trying NOT to take a stand but they're being forced to.  Either they allow them or they don't, and either way is taking a side.

The pro-gun folks are walking in conspicuously armed.  Starbucks is hoping that they'll do this for a week or so (and buy a latte while they're there), and then simply quit doing that, point made.  If the antigun folks don't stage a boycott, Starbucks won't get hurt too badly (although I imagine a lot of people would leave after feeling uncomfortable around conspicuous gun carrying).  If Starbucks were to ban guns, they'd get sued.




_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 6:26:28 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		at 4 or 5 bucks for a cup of coffee arent they sticking a gun in your ribs anyhow?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 6:27:12 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

If Starbucks were to ban guns, they'd get sued.


I think you are right about Starbucks getting sued if they tried...but... in Oklahoma, which has pretty strong "right to carry laws", there are large conspicuous signs stating that the Post Office is Federal property and the carrying of firearms inside the Post Office is a federal crime.

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 6:27:45 AM   
DomImus


Posts: 2004
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
If Starbucks were to ban guns, they'd get sued.


From the article:

"Businesses can choose to ban guns from their premises. And Starbucks said Wednesday that it complies with local laws in the 43 states that have open-carry weapon laws."

A private business can restrict the possession of firearms on their property in many jurisdictions. I think it's unfortunate that these groups likes the anti gun (and anti-Constitution) group in the article choose to go beyond the basic issue at hand and make a private business owner a pawn in their argument. They sure seem to be married to free speech aspects of the Constitution. Too bad the rest of document doesn't mean as much to them.




_____________________________

"Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable." Sidney J. harris

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 6:39:49 AM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline 		The whole scenario appears to be a publicity stunt targeting Starbucks because it is the largest coffee shop retail chain in the U.S. The company and its employees and customers does not need to be put in the middle of this controversy.

Can you imagine what a buzz-kill it would be to be standing in line waiting or drinking your beverage and minding your own business while pro-gun and gun control advocates face off about these issues? Seriously people, go have a political rally in a public place in front of a government building.





_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 6:43:58 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

If the antigun folks don't stage a boycott, Starbucks won't get hurt too badly


I don't think a boycott would last more than a day or two, Steve, even if one were started.  Keep in mind, Starbucks sells a highly addictive product.  People NEED their latte. 

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 7:03:15 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus


A private business can restrict the possession of firearms on their property in many jurisdictions. I think it's unfortunate that these groups likes the anti gun (and anti-Constitution) group in the article choose to go beyond the basic issue at hand and make a private business owner a pawn in their argument. They sure seem to be married to free speech aspects of the Constitution. Too bad the rest of document doesn't mean as much to them.



WHOA!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHO made this an issue and made a private business a pawn in their argument?

There would have been no anti-gun demonstrations if there were not the organized attempts by open-carry advocates to make an issue of it.







< Message edited by rulemylife -- 3/4/2010 7:04:25 AM >

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 7:34:59 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
Maybe their "liberal" reputation came from offering all their employees, even the part time ones, health insurance.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 8:22:06 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


Maybe their "liberal" reputation came from offering all their employees, even the part time ones, health insurance.


Or maybe it came from they're being headquartered in Seattle Wa...der

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 8:24:57 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
This quote is taken from your cite.
Isn't the Brady campaign to prevent gun violence a Republican organization started by a Republican mouth piece for a Republican president?
Why is it that the conservative Republicans want to destroy the 2nd ammendment?



Prove Brady is a conservative, show me one conservative they've endorsed in the last 20 years, just one.

Brady's about as conservative as Arlen Specter is.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 8:27:19 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		there are no conservatives, and haven't been any that I am aware of, past Ike.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 9:14:14 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

there are no conservatives, and haven't been any that I am aware of, past Ike.

Nixon?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 9:20:59 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		USPS taken OFF BOOK, US taken OFF THE GOLD STANDARD, ESCALATION OF VIET NAM, among other peccadillos yeah, republican, not conservative--------we find those are two entirely different things and not at all synonomous.

Bennie D'Israeli and Stanley Baldwin (with a little David Lloyd George tossed in)



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot - 3/4/2010 9:37:29 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		but do they use fluoridated water?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Starbucks: A twist on adding a shot Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094