thornhappy
Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006 Status: offline
|
You've said a few times that CA has 32% of the caseload, and it has a per capita rate of 3.69, from what I can calculate. In 2003 CA was # 5 in recipients per capita at 3.005 (DC was #1 at 7.835). With such a huge population, you'd expect CA to be a large contributor to the nation's welfare caseload, especially since housing dumped. I don't feel so inspired as to go and calculate 2009 per capita rates for other states. Even with 32% of the nation's caseload, the number of caseloads is down 47% since the 1996 welfare reforms. That 32% figure, from HHS, does not break down into multi-generational or not, refugee/legal immigrant, etc. quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote:
ORIGINAL: thornhappy Didn't that go out the welfare reform back in the '90s? How do you get multi-generational welfare with a 5 year limit? Mileage varies widely from state to state, Thorns. Some participants shift to other programs (the already mentioned SSDI, for example), there are circumstances that can reported to apply for a waiver of time limits (your local ACORN office could likely advise on that), or, a new name can be placed in the "head of household" box to reset the clock. Depending on the rules of the various states, the clock can also stop running, with food stamps, medical benefits, and housing subsidies mostly unaffected. California has 32% of the nation's welfare caseload. As I'm sure you can easily figure out, the policies I'm most knowledgeable about are pretty toothless. Texas is a whole different situation.
< Message edited by thornhappy -- 3/8/2010 1:54:25 PM >
|