Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: philosophy FR ....the problem with defining the centre is the same as defining the average. i'm sure we can all remember the diferent types of average we wrestled with at school; mean, median and modal. Assuming a non-homogenous population each type of average can give a different value. So, in politics, there is no actual centre to be defined.....just an endless argument over the tools that could be used to define such a thing. We all make choices based on one of two approaches......party allegience or issue by issue analysis. Clearly we occasionaly confuse the two. Sophistry is alive and well in this sphere..... At the end of the day there can be no answer to this question. There is no centre to be held, just as there is no monolithic left or right. There is only the issues. This thread was begun with an observation that Sanity claimed the centre ground, more or less. i'm sure he thinks he does hold that ground, just as Kittinsol does, just as Firm and Treasure do, just as Julia does, just as MM does, just as i do. We're all correct. In the only analysis that matters, our own. We believe in certain issues and we feel that we are open to reasonable argument. We consider ourselves to argue in good faith. We believe that the force of our arguments can be compelling. We are all the centre. Except Realone. He's just a bit mad. Agreed, phil--almost. Yes, the overall point here is the uselessness of any artificial paradigm, and the left/right one has become such a basic and habitual filter that people forget it's not reality. On this, conservatives, moderates and liberals in this thread have agreed. But just because, yes, the middle is squishy to define, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. That too is the point. While the sides line up, people aren't on one side or the other--most are in the middle. And even on each side, there are people there close to the middle. So we have the illusion---and here, yes, then media contributes to this---of conflicts and divides much wider than they are. This perception is then exploited for political gain. It's not true. The electorate needs to remember this, overlook the rhetoric and focus on the true issues and how best to address them.
|