RE: Public Schools (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


juliaoceania -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 9:56:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Neo-Nazi.


I find I just ignore him, he has no credibility here. Even if he post something occasionally that has some relevance I just put it down to "a broken clock is right twice a day"




subfever -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 9:57:27 AM)

quote:

I absolutely agree with you, and this is part of the structure I have a lot of problems with... what sort of institution designs a loyalty oath for little kids that do not even read yet? I mean, think about it


Oh, I have thought about it.

Our "education" is fertile indoctrination right out of the gate. The primary purpose of "education" is to train us to conform, submit, and compete in a world of intentional scarcity.




juliaoceania -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:00:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever

quote:

I absolutely agree with you, and this is part of the structure I have a lot of problems with... what sort of institution designs a loyalty oath for little kids that do not even read yet? I mean, think about it


Oh, I have thought about it.

Our "education" is fertile indoctrination right out of the gate. The primary purpose of "education" is to train us to conform, submit, and compete in a world of intentional scarcity.


When my son was in grammar school they wanted to teach him how to open a checking account and they wanted to have him invest in stock. He was in 3rd grade. It was part of their "economic literacy" campaign.... they also wanted to teach them about credit, like how credit cards work. I thought this was creepy. I can understand having a class in high school for such things, but 3rd grade? It seemed a bit like teaching him to be indebted and invested into the system. A good little consumer.






Real0ne -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:02:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Neo-Nazi.


I find I just ignore him, he has no credibility here. Even if he post something occasionally that has some relevance I just put it down to "a broken clock is right twice a day"




its not different than the words of a conservative to a liberal right?  They dont have any credibility either.

Likewise the other way around.

I think you will find that credibility today is based on "does it agree with me" or my "agenda".

I dont operate that way.







Real0ne -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:04:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania
When my son was in grammar school they wanted to teach him how to open a checking account and they wanted to have him invest in stock. He was in 3rd grade. It was part of their "economic literacy" campaign.... they also wanted to teach them about credit, like how credit cards work. I thought this was creepy. I can understand having a class in high school for such things, but 3rd grade? It seemed a bit like teaching him to be indebted and invested into the system. A good little consumer.


I agree.

Totally!

Does that mean that what you said is not credible now? ;)






sravaka -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:05:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

Old links, 2004 scholarship... again, let it go. It just ends up working against you, and against points that need to be raised.


2004 is not all that long ago, when I am doing my literature review that would be considered relevant... anything 10 years old or sooner... and if you cannot see why the Christian Right taking over school systems and curricula is an important piece of the puzzle for why schools are failing, well I guess there is nothing I can say about it that will influence you to see why this is a huge issue in the failing school system...

I would not call it ego, I would call it intellectual honesty... I have some and if someone asks for proof and I provide it, I expect he person to at least review what I posted before dismissing it. He was prepared to reject it before I posted it, and I suppose I shouldn't have went out of my way to do so. I hate my time wasted.



Julia,

I understand your frustration.  I perceive, though, that you are hoping to have cake and eat it too. 

You're in grad school, I take it?  Well, then you are going places that don't translate, already.  You need to work harder, however difficult or ill-fitting or aggravating that may seem, if you want to communicate.

Hint:  you can't talk about your literature review to people who haven't also done time in grad school.  It would be nice if you could... but you can't.

And (for non-grad school people who may be reading), it's all happenstance (being in the right place at the right time with the right mix of skills).  It certainly worked that way for me, and if you, Julia, are in the US, I'd be surprised if it didn't work that way for you too.

Work from the subtance of whatever argument you can muster, is the ultimate point.  None of the rest counts for much in the real world.




subfever -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:07:03 AM)

quote:

It seemed a bit like teaching him to be indebted and invested into the system. A good little consumer.


Bingo




juliaoceania -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:07:54 AM)

quote:

its not different than the words of a conservative to a liberal right? They dont have any credibility either.

Likewise the other way around.

I think you will find that credibility today is based on "does it agree with me" or my "agenda".

I dont operate that way.



You are the only person on collarme that I have labeled as having no credibility... you are completely lacking in it. There is nothing you post that I would feel the need to investigate further. You are that negated in my world.

There are others here that I do not agree with on substantial issues that I read their links, and their posts. I may not like them or their views, so much so I do not post to them, but I do not post that someone has no credibility unless I think they are a nutcase, and you are a nutcase and a conspiracy theorist, and a genocide denier... you post hurtful things in front of people who have lost people in the Holocaust and you do not care if you are hurtful. I wish they would ban your ass so I would not have to wade through your post and the shit storms they cause. I have never wished anyone was banned until you.




intenze -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:12:44 AM)

quote:


Our "education" is fertile indoctrination right out of the gate. The primary purpose of "education" is to train us to conform, submit, and compete in a world of intentional scarcity.


I hope, as an educator, that is not true. I hope we teach conformity in the sense of social adaptation; how to get along with other people and work together is a very important part of living and working. I hope we do not teach submission, but instead give students enough higher learning skills to recognize bullshit when they see it, and the tools to examine it when they are not sure.
As for intentional scarcity, I would rather be able to teach students to survive and thrive than not, no matter what shape the world is in.
We have very specific goals in our school: to create a suportive community for all students, to teach usable 21st century skills, and to invite open inquiry about all subjects. We do not encourage conformity or submission.
Platitudes like yours are easy to say, hard to back up.




TreasureKY -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:18:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

If you look back on why the pledge was started, it was started by a socialist who was also a flag sales person. He wanted to drum up excitement for Flag Day, so he wrote the pledge and went to schools to sell flags with it... true story.


No, not a "true story".  A twisted perversion of the truth, at best. 

Francis Bellamy (the author of the Pledge of Allegiance) was never a flag sales person.  He was on the staff at The Youth's Companion which was a popular family magazine at that time.  His piece was written (and originally published anonymously) to support a campaign originated by James Upham (with whom Mr. Bellamy was assigned to work) to promote his "National Public School Celebration for Columbus Day".  Mr. Upham, an enthusiastic supporter of patriotic causes, had a desire to supply every public school in the country with a flag and to familiarize every pupil in the country with a flag­raising ceremony.

Mr. Bellamy, with strong support from the Superintendents of Education of the National Education Association, was eventually made chairman of the National Education Association's executive committee for the celebration.  The National Education Associate then adopted a series of resolutions recommending the project to all superintendents, teachers, and newspapers, with a program of exercises for the occasion written by The Youth's Companion.

There are many sources readily available online for the truth.  Here are just a couple:

University of Rochester Library Bulletin, Volume VIII · Winter 1953 · Number 2

The Pledge of Allegiance - A Revised History and Analysis, 2007, by Dr. John W. Baer

But Julia... don't let the facts get in the way of your beliefs.  [;)]




juliaoceania -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:23:58 AM)

quote:

I hope, as an educator, that is not true. I hope we teach conformity in the sense of social adaptation; how to get along with other people and work together is a very important part of living and working. I hope we do not teach submission, but instead give students enough higher learning skills to recognize bullshit when they see it, and to examine it when they are not sure.
As for intentional scarcity, I would rather be able to teach students to survive and thrive than not, no matter what shape the world is in.
We have very specific goals in our school: to create a suportive community for all students, to teach usable 21st century skills, and to invite open inquiry about all subjects. We do not encourage conformity or submission.
Platitudes like yours are easy to say, hard to back up.


I would think, as a teacher, that you may have asked yourself these questions

"Why is the hierarchy of education set up the way that it is?"
"Why are some skillsets more valued than others?"
"Who decides what knowledge is valuable when setting up the curriculum?"

There are other questions that could be asked, but I think you get the drift, we have a specific target of what we find of value in schools, and that is not always translatable to what our children have a desire to explore or to know. We do not encourage kids with a love of social science to pursue it most of the time. We do not encourage artists to produce art as a vocation most of the time. We do not encourage writers to think about a career in writing most of the time. In short, we as a society are focused on "marketable skills" because those are the skills that corporations need our young people to pursue. We need engineers, math majors, and chemists. This is the sort of skills that kids are encouraged to pursue, even if their hearts tell them they want to sing, they are encouraged to have a "day job". This is because our society does not value them unless they have a marketable talent.

I am not dissing teachers. I think many teachers have the best of motivations, but they are still a part of the "matrix" if you will, just as parents and students are... actually just like I am. You have accepted this institutional structure as having legitimacy, even if it seemingly isn't working very well for those it is supposed to serve, and if you look at our kids in comparison to other countries of similar wealth, our system is broken. Now we can go around blaming the usual scapegoats, kids, parents, teachers, or we could blame the system...




juliaoceania -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:31:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

If you look back on why the pledge was started, it was started by a socialist who was also a flag sales person. He wanted to drum up excitement for Flag Day, so he wrote the pledge and went to schools to sell flags with it... true story.


No, not a "true story".  A twisted perversion of the truth, at best. 

Francis Bellamy (the author of the Pledge of Allegiance) was never a flag sales person.  He was on the staff at The Youth's Companion which was a popular family magazine at that time.  His piece was written (and originally published anonymously) to support a campaign originated by James Upham (with whom Mr. Bellamy was assigned to work) to promote his "National Public School Celebration for Columbus Day".  Mr. Upham, an enthusiastic supporter of patriotic causes, had a desire to supply every public school in the country with a flag and to familiarize every pupil in the country with a flag­raising ceremony.

Mr. Bellamy, with strong support from the Superintendents of Education of the National Education Association, was eventually made chairman of the National Education Association's executive committee for the celebration.  The National Education Associate then adopted a series of resolutions recommending the project to all superintendents, teachers, and newspapers, with a program of exercises for the occasion written by The Youth's Companion.

There are many sources readily available online for the truth.  Here are just a couple:

University of Rochester Library Bulletin, Volume VIII · Winter 1953 · Number 2

The Pledge of Allegiance - A Revised History and Analysis, 2007, by Dr. John W. Baer

But Julia... don't let the facts get in the way of your beliefs.  [;)]



So he wasn't invested in flag sales? He wasn't a socialist? Your own links support what I said...

Since the book by Baer is referenced for this wiki article and the link you provided for it states you find him to be an expert on Francis Bellemy

quote:

Francis Julius Bellamy born in Mount Morris, NY on (May 18, 1855 – August 28, 1931) was an American Baptist minister and Christian Socialist[1] who wrote the original Pledge of Allegiance in 1892. It was published in the Youth's Companion, which was a nationally circulated magazine for adolescents, and by 1892 was the largest publication of any type in the United States, with a circulation around 500,000. His cousin Edward Bellamy is the noted author of the socialist utopian novels, Looking Backward (1888) and Equality (1897). In 1891, Daniel Sharp Ford, the owner of the Youth's Companion, hired Bellamy to work with Ford's nephew James B. Upham in the magazine's premium department. In 1888, the Youth's CompanionAmerican flags to public schools as a premium to solicit subscriptions. had begun a campaign to sell For Upham and Bellamy, the flag promotion was more than merely a business move; under their influence, the Youth's Companion became a fervent supporter of the schoolhouse flag movement, which aimed to place a flag above every school in the nation. By 1892, the magazine had sold American flags to approximately 26,000 schools. By this time the market was slowing for flags, but was not yet saturated. The previous year, Upham had the idea of using the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus reaching the Americas to further bolster the schoolhouse flag movement. The magazine called for a national Columbian Public School Celebration to coincide with the World's Columbian Exposition. A flag salute was to be part of the official program for the Columbus Day celebration to be held in schools all over America. The Pledge was published in the September 8, 1892, issue of the magazine, and immediately put to use in the campaign. Bellamy went to speak to a national meeting of school superintendents to promote the celebration; the convention liked the idea and selected a committee of leading educators to implement the program, including the immediate past president of the National Education Association. Bellamy was selected as the chair. Having received the official blessing of educators, Bellamy's committee now had the task of spreading the word across the nation and of designing an official program for schools to follow on the day of national celebration. He structured the program around a flag raising ceremony and his pledge.

So he wasn't a socialist?

He did not profit from flag sales?






Real0ne -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:34:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

You are the only person on collarme that I have labeled as having no credibility... you are completely lacking in it. There is nothing you post that I would feel the need to investigate further. You are that negated in my world.

There are others here that I do not agree with on substantial issues that I read their links, and their posts. I may not like them or their views, so much so I do not post to them, but I do not post that someone has no credibility unless I think they are a nutcase, and you are a nutcase and a conspiracy theorist, and a genocide denier... you post hurtful things in front of people who have lost people in the Holocaust and you do not care if you are hurtful. I wish they would ban your ass so I would not have to wade through your post and the shit storms they cause. I have never wished anyone was banned until you.



Well if you insist on pigeon holing yourself like that what can I say.  You see there are whether you realize it or not several issues that we completely agree on and if I am not credible then how can you claim credibility.

Just because you disagree with my standing on a couple issues does preclude everything I talk about is not credible unless you wish to include your own positions that we both agree on.  In fact I can back virtually everything I say out here in the terms expressed.  

The opposite side of that domain is those who are so well programmed and indoctrinated they have become conspiracy deniars and it is a religion to many out here.

Should I just agree to "go along"?  With that policy why even have any discussions at all?  Why not everyone just go along with and agree with whatever?

The way I see it you are a victim of precisely what you wish to save your children from.  You and many others out here have been programmed.  You heard the terms genocide so often and they showed you pictures many of which in many cases were russian atrocities but you never researched that to know the difference as to who did what and you carry it forward as if it were gospel.  Is that not indoctrination to a false precept?

I can easily argue by comparative history that no genocide took place either.  Why you would claim I am not credible when I am the only one who puts up data and everyone else just shouts emotional insults does not make sense for someone claiming to be a credible critical thinker.

You dont like it when people try to tell you what your expereince and abilities in life are why would you not give others the same space you demand for yourself?

Then as a final blow to the 1st amendment ban me from the ability to freely speak because its not what you want to hear?

There seem to be a lot of diametrically opposed directions you are travelling at the same time.

As for the shit storms why do you blame me because so many people go into emotional rage?  Do you feel I am responsible for their inability to control themselves?

Wouldnt it be better for them to control themsleves?  People get shot because of minor traffic infractions when they cant control themselves.  Is that a better world?

Whatever trips your trigger I spose.






Real0ne -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:39:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania
I would think, as a teacher, that you may have asked yourself these questions

"Why is the hierarchy of education set up the way that it is?"
"Why are some skillsets more valued than others?"
"Who decides what knowledge is valuable when setting up the curriculum?"


the borg collective (democracy).

resistance is futile!  :)




juliaoceania -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:42:39 AM)

quote:

Then as a final blow to the 1st amendment ban me from the ability to freely speak because its not what you want to hear?


This shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what the first amendment states. The first amendment does not stop me from pushing you out of my business because you are saying offensive stuff. It does not force me to engage in a conversation with you. It does not require CM to allow you a platform from which to Holocaust deny from. You have NO RIGHT to go on any private message board and spew your lies, collarme only allows you to, they could stop you at any time they chose to. If they do they are not denying you a first amendment right to free speech anymore than I am denying a political campaign free speech when they call me at dinner time and I hang up on them.

This is why you continue to lack credibility... it is idiotic statements like these.




belladevine -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:42:48 AM)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r85o9lTVAfs&feature=related




intenze -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:46:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


I would think, as a teacher, that you may have asked yourself these questions

"Why is the hierarchy of education set up the way that it is?"
"Why are some skillsets more valued than others?"
"Who decides what knowledge is valuable when setting up the curriculum?"

There are other questions that could be asked, but I think you get the drift, we have a specific target of what we find of value in schools, and that is not always translatable to what our children have a desire to explore or to know. We do not encourage kids with a love of social science to pursue it most of the time. We do not encourage artists to produce art as a vocation most of the time. We do not encourage writers to think about a career in writing most of the time. In short, we as a society are focused on "marketable skills" because those are the skills that corporations need our young people to pursue. We need engineers, math majors, and chemists. This is the sort of skills that kids are encouraged to pursue, even if their hearts tell them they want to sing, they are encouraged to have a "day job". This is because our society does not value them unless they have a marketable talent.



I used to see a lot more of that kind of do-a-certain-career-as-necessity thing than I do now. I think we try hard to help students pursue the path they love the most, not the most useful tool in society. The arts are extremely important in my school, and I am proud of that, even though I am a nose-to-grindstone science teacher!
Yes we do focus on marketable skills, education is about helping people to become adults, and like it or not adults are expected to contribute in some way. That is an important social skill. That does not mean we shut the door on creativity.

I am sorry you have had such a bad experience with public schools. I understand completely how someone can become embittered. A bad experience in school leaves a terrible imprint.

That being said, I love my job, and even as I struggle to get my students to ask a question, to go outside the box, to think instead of memorize, I believe in what I am doing. Is the system flawed? Oh hell yes. Most large systems are. Change comes slowly, but it is coming. Educational reform has already made many changes, most for the good. Educators have become more accountable, and will continue to be under the microscope. The bar has definitely been raised.

Howevery, lucky for anyone who does not wish to participate in the public school sytem, there are options everywhere. I for one would rather see people participate and become change agents than complain.




TreasureKY -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:47:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

So he wasn't a socialist?

He did not profit from flag sales?


Did my post challenge your claim that he was socialist?

So... you're wanting to emphasize that Francis Bellamy was a socialist, yet demonize his actions with capitalist motives.

Interesting.





Musicmystery -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:48:36 AM)

quote:

We do not encourage kids with a love of social science to pursue it most of the time. We do not encourage artists to produce art as a vocation most of the time. We do not encourage writers to think about a career in writing most of the time. In short, we as a society are focused on "marketable skills" because those are the skills that corporations need our young people to pursue. We need engineers, math majors, and chemists. This is the sort of skills that kids are encouraged to pursue, even if their hearts tell them they want to sing, they are encouraged to have a "day job". This is because our society does not value them unless they have a marketable talent.


You've answered your own question.

I'm a musician and a writer. It's not an easy way to go. The competition is intensely fierce, and even many talented people will not be about to work in these fields. Advising students on the side of caution, as outlined above, is prudent. Not to do so would be reckless and irresponsible. And mediocre to mildly talented students with an interest should be discouraged in terms of a career path in these directions. They will not make it. It should remain a hobby. And that's fine---I love to take pictures. I don't try to sell them, or to work for someone else taking pictures.

You're arguing disparate points. That our society economically values some skills and professions higher than others is obvious. If you want to change that, fine. I'd be interested in seeing just how you plan to do that. But in the meantime, teaching students about the world they actually live in is the responsible approach. To examine it, question it, explore it--OK, fine. That's important too.

In the meantime, though, practical skills are essential. I learned to be a successful businessman--the hard way. Dreams need to be funded. Learning how to do that within the content of the society that is should remain an essential part of education.




juliaoceania -> RE: Public Schools (3/14/2010 10:52:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

So he wasn't a socialist?

He did not profit from flag sales?


Did my post challenge your claim that he was socialist?

So... you're wanting to emphasize that Francis Bellamy was a socialist, yet demonize his actions with capitalist motives.

Interesting.




No.. I am stating what was done, and I used your source to show it, now we can have a conversation about socialists that also like money on another occasion because socialist are not adverse to making money... that just shows a complete fundamental lack of what socialists believe in my experience...

Like I said, the company hired him to push flag sales, you can spin that another direction, it does not change what he did. The article even states that profit was not his only motivation, but I am sure it was a partial one...




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125