NeedToUseYou -> RE: Three men charged in 'dungeon' castration (4/2/2006 12:09:52 AM)
|
I could really care less if a guy gets his balls cut off(if sane, which is a big question). Now, that being said I really don't think just anyone should be able to do surgery on anybody they want. For one training aside I doubt this guy had all the necessary equipment, drugs, blood, etc.. necessary if something did go wrong. Two the legal ramifications would be disturbing, so if all was required was consent, then what's to stop parents from giving consent to get their kids hacked on by some demented guy with a fetish. So, it really begs the question in this world were consent is the only requirement for anything who would give consent for kids, mentally ill, or those not in a position to make such decisions. It's a simplistic argument to say all that should be required is adult consent. So, in that world were only consent is required well, nothing is off limits. Bizarre, I really don't want to see my 400 lb neighbor fingering his ass in his front yard.(oh I see you still want that law in place). Well, he consented did it on his propery, and the government can't tell a adult what to do. Well, let's loan each other our unmentionables while we're at it. Fun, Fun, Fun. Right. Hey, the parents gave consent, well that's all that's needed in consent land right.(Oh you want that law in place to). The retarded guy down the street said I could borrow his head. Fuck were's the knife.(Oh you want that one to). The lady with alzheimers wrote me a check for her life savings (oh you want that one to I see). The lady down the street just lost her husband of 40 years and is saying she wants to die to. This is going to be fun(where'd I put that shotgun). Later tonight there is going to be human flesh dining at the canabalism club. Fuck they consented it's alright. Well, that's consent land. Oh okay now everyone is going to qualify that consent is only needed but in x, y, and z situations consent is never a justification. Hmmm, sounds like the current system to me. So, basicly people just want to have the right to do what they want to do, and don't want others to have rights they don't want themselves. Wow, the injustice of the world, hacks can't legally cut balls off humans. The consent argument, is completely unrealistic, to point of making santa claus look plausible. It's really called anarchy. Anarchy despite all the fantasy doesn't work at all. Sorry. Unless you want to do all those types of things 99.9% of people would agree once they think about it shouldn't be legal. Some laws are debatable but that is another thing. Saying consent is a universal qualifier for doing anything. Is completely wrong.
|
|
|
|