Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 - 3/19/2010 1:43:48 PM   
Louve00


Posts: 1674
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: barelynangel

quote:

But let me ask you something now, Angel. Do you think a business should be a good neighbor, being a benefit to the neighborhood that allows them to bring in the money they do...or do you think they should just go by numbers and make their determinations on that alone?


LouveOO,

Personally, i don't see how this decision on the part of Walgreens is HARMING the neighborhood they reside within. You seem to be implying they are HARMING people and these people won't be able to GET their medication. All this is doing is MOVING where people get their medication and i can guarantee it will still be within the "neighborhood." Also, the company is STILL providing services to all of its existing medicaid customers, so again, its not that they are HARMING, its they are simply shuffling people about to other places.

Your example by the way makes no sense to me. Walgreens isn't saying medicaid people can't shop in their store -- they are in fact still providing a service to existing customers. They are saying that they are not accepting NEW medicaid customers in their pharmacy. THAT is all.

You are right you can do whatever you wish, but i think its silly in my opinion to boycott a store because they simply inconvenience a few people and are actually giving business to OTHER stores. Which still benefits the neighborhood but not walgreens, necessarily. But i guess its just easier to demonize walgreens instead of seeing the overall picture because you know everything in this world is about and more fun to scream and shout about for drama in discrimination rather than simply a business decision for a company.

angel


~sighs

I regretted answering you when I saw your reply earlier to me because you act like a little nipping chihuahua if someone says something you don't like...coming back at them and back at them and back at them again.  (yes, you must have read something I said and hit reply, which is why, earlier, I thought you chose to go over this with me)

After doing more than implying...after acknowledging you were right in your thinking about it being one state, you were still right, but I am still a consumer with rights too.  However non-sensical you may think they are means nothing at all to me.  Thats not because of any other reason than I, as a consumer, can spend my money how ever and where ever I want to.  If  I perceive a certain ethic I don't like about a business, again, I can choose to either spend or not with them. 

It doesn't mean because "I" feel that way, that I want you or anyone else to, either. 

And I'm sorry if you think its silly, don't understand it, don't want to understand it, or what, but the last time I checked, thats what boycotting's all about....not giving your business to something or someone...or a COMPANY...for a reason you, as a consumer, feel is worthy.

I may not be a medicaid patient, but as you pointed out, even a person under a certain type of insurance may not be eligible for a Dr, or (I guess) a pharmacy.  I know one of my husbands Dr's doesn't take Humana.  I wouldn't boycott that Dr , because that Dr gave me a reason I thought was plausible to me and he helped save my husbands life, so for that alone, I'm biased.  And in truth, after listening to everyone's arguments about things my mind may have changed (but I'm not about to say whether I have or I haven't).

Bottom line is, its not up to you to decide where people spend thier money, nor is it up to you if their decisions are right or wrong.  Sure you can give an opinion on it.  But honestly, giving post after post of opinions, when I've stopped responding after my initial post, feels like I'm being nipped by a little yapping chihuahua.







_____________________________

For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearance, as though they were realities and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are. - Niccolo Machiavelli

(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 - 3/19/2010 2:04:39 PM   
barelynangel


Posts: 6233
Status: offline
Louve,

okay my reaction to your first paragraph of your post was -- you have got to be fucking kidding me. What? you are now wanting to make this a personal attack because you don't like something i say. Get over yourself seriously its not that deep.

Let's clarify shall we. At the risk of bruising your ego, i didn't even realize i responses TO you because what i did when reading replies was go to the bottom of the page and type a reponse. Your's must have been the LAST reply before mine. I hate to draw you away from your self-importance but Louve until you actually responded to my post -- i hadn't even READ your posts in this thread outside of the one you sent to me initially. Yeah, you aren't a person i usually read on the boards. I skimmed your post to me and responded in general to the whole outside of commenting to you my post wasn't actually TO you. I then didn't even finish reading your post to me until later, when i was skimming the posts and saw my name, and read your last paragraph addressed to me -- of which i responded in the post you quoted above.

I have only read the 1st paragraph of what i deem your whining post to me lol so if there was anything substantial to the thread and the discussion -- i won't be reading it. I have no fucking clue why you wanted to make this personal but its really stupid and petty.


angel

< Message edited by barelynangel -- 3/19/2010 2:06:15 PM >


_____________________________


What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
R.W. Emerson


(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 - 3/19/2010 2:08:50 PM   
Louve00


Posts: 1674
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
 Angel...shut the fuck up, will you??  Go nip someone else,  I'm through messing with it

_____________________________

For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearance, as though they were realities and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are. - Niccolo Machiavelli

(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 - 3/19/2010 2:23:08 PM   
barelynangel


Posts: 6233
Status: offline
What are YOU talking about -- i have been simply discussing a topic in this thread and suddenly you are up my ass whining. Its not ME who has to shut the fuck up as i have been doing what the TOS allows -- DISCUSSING a topic, you are the one running off at the mouth about me on a personal level and now are whining more when i respond to same.

You shouldn't have STARTED the messing with it if you are now gonna keep whining personally at me.

If you can't take replies to a topic in a thread Louve, then perhaps its time you stop getting involved in a discussion. Again, its a miscellaneous anonymous discussion board online -- its not that deep.

angel

_____________________________


What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
R.W. Emerson


(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 - 3/19/2010 2:26:31 PM   
Louve00


Posts: 1674
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
This is the last time I will be responding to you.  YOU can get over YOURSELF! When I start taking a forum board personally, you're right, its time to stop reading.  Now...be a good little girl and leave me alone

(nip, nip)

(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 - 3/19/2010 2:30:27 PM   
VideoAdminSigma


Posts: 1016
Joined: 7/29/2008
Status: offline
To whom it may concern:

Let's keep on the April 16 at Walgreen's discussion and its surrounding implications. If you find someone who upsets your day here use the hide button.

VideoAdminSigma

(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 - 3/19/2010 2:34:44 PM   
barelynangel


Posts: 6233
Status: offline
Louve, again, let's be clear shall we -- i haven't said ANYTHING to you other than ONE actual post wherein i quoted the part of your post i was responding to -- until such time you started personally spating at me me over what i have no fucking clue. Its not me yapping -- perhaps you need to look in the mirror.

Good call on the last responding to me because you are making NO sense. Let's see if it will hold. lol also a good time to get away from the board is when you believe a persons responses are all to you.

Louve, you don't have what it takes to make me a good little girl, your statement regards to such and your whining to me on this thread speaks of issues honestly, i have no clue about. As i said, you aren't someone i pay attention to on the boards, i don't speak with you so if you have an issue -- deal with it because this is just stupid.

And Louve, perhaps you need to reread the thread, i wasn't the one who started bothering the other.

angel

_____________________________


What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
R.W. Emerson


(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 - 3/20/2010 2:46:29 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

The current healthcare reform debacle is indeed Obama's fault. He's the one who told Congress he wanted to sign healthcare reform into law by at least three different DEADLINES last year but still hasn't been able to get his own party, which has a supermajority in Congress, to pass a bill for him to sign. You can obfuscate that all you want, but that's the plain and simple and irrefutable fact of the matter.


This thread is about state rights and how they are being billed for meds, and how the state isnt paying them enough to break even on said meds. Obama aint got shit to do with this.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 88
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.313